Challenges of handling assembly information in global manufacturing companies

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe challenges the manufacturing industry is currently facing when developing future assembly information systems. More specific, this paper focuses on the handling of assembly information from manufacturing engineering to the shop floor operators. Design/methodology/approach – Multiple case studies have been conducted within one case company between 2014 and 2017. To broaden the perspective, interviews with additionally 17 large and global manufacturing companies and 3 industry experts have been held. Semi-structured interviews have been the main data collection method alongside observations and web questionnaires. Findings – Six focus areas have been defined which address important challenges in the manufacturing industry. For manual assembly intense manufacturing company, challenges such as IT challenges, process challenges, assembly process disturbances, information availability, technology and process control, and assembly work instructions have been identified and hinder implementation of Industry 4.0 (I4.0). Originality/value – This longitudinal study provides a current state analysis of the challenges the manufacturing industry is facing when handling assembly information. Despite the vast amount of initiatives within I4.0 and digitalization, this paper argues that the manufacturing industry needs to address the six defined focus areas to become more flexible and prepared for the transition toward a digitalized manufacturing industry.

[1]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  Empirical research methods in operations management , 1990 .

[2]  G. Ashmore Better Information Means Better Quality , 1992 .

[3]  Marshall L. Fisher,et al.  Strategies for Product Variety: Lessons From the Auto Industry , 1995 .

[4]  Philip Yetton,et al.  Integrating information technology divisions in a bank merger Fit, compatibility and models of change , 1996, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  10 Potholes in the Road to Information Quality , 1997, Computer.

[6]  Franck Ganier Processing text and pictures in procedural instructions , 2000 .

[7]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  F. GANIER Factors affecting the processing of procedural instructions: implications for document design , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[9]  Ton Spil,et al.  Post-merger IT integration strategies: An IT alignment perspective , 2006, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Deyi Xue,et al.  A framework for generating product production information for mass customization , 2008 .

[11]  Hoda A. ElMaraghy Changing and Evolving Products and Systems - Models and Enablers , 2009 .

[12]  Ricky Curran,et al.  Do dynamic work instructions provide an advantage over static instructions in a small scale assembly task , 2010 .

[13]  Dan Högberg,et al.  Supporting attention in manual assembly and its influence on quality , 2010 .

[14]  Keith Case,et al.  Using mobile information sources to increase productivity and quality , 2010 .

[15]  H. ElMaraghy,et al.  A model for measuring products assembly complexity , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[16]  Johan Stahre,et al.  A classification of carrier and content of information , 2012 .

[17]  Dan Högberg,et al.  Kitting as an information source in manual assembly , 2012 .

[18]  Åsa Fast-Berglund,et al.  Relations between complexity, quality and cognitive automation in mixed-model assembly , 2013 .

[19]  He Wang,et al.  Utilizing variant differentiation to mitigate manufacturing complexity in mixed-model assembly systems , 2013 .

[20]  Magnus Åkerman,et al.  CREATING STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL ASSEMBLY INSTRUCTIONS – CURRENT STATE ANALYSIS , 2014 .

[21]  Fred Niederman,et al.  Integrating the IS functions after mergers and acquisitions: Analyzing business-IT alignment , 2014, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Anders Haug,et al.  Work instruction quality in industrial management , 2015 .

[23]  Åsa Fasth Berglund,et al.  Use of Assembly Information in Global Production Networks , 2015 .

[24]  Lihui Wang,et al.  Current status and advancement of cyber-physical systems in manufacturing , 2015 .

[25]  Mats Jackson,et al.  Drivers of Complexity in a Flexible Assembly System- A Case Study☆ , 2016 .

[26]  Åsa Fast-Berglund,et al.  Evaluation of Guidelines for Assembly Instructions , 2016 .

[27]  Bruno Vallespir,et al.  Writing and verifying interoperability requirements: Application to collaborative processes , 2016, Comput. Ind..

[28]  Sandra Mattsson,et al.  Multi-Variant Truck Production - Product Variety and its Impact on Production Quality in Manual Assembly , 2016 .

[29]  David Romero,et al.  Enterprise information systems state of the art: Past, present and future trends , 2016, Comput. Ind..

[30]  Lena Moestam,et al.  Global Truck Production – The Importance of Having a Robust Manufacturing Preparation Process , 2016 .

[31]  Daqiang Zhang,et al.  Towards smart factory for industry 4.0: a self-organized multi-agent system with big data based feedback and coordination , 2016, Comput. Networks.

[32]  F. Ganier,et al.  Are instructions in video format always better than photographs when learning manual techniques? The case of learning how to do sutures , 2016 .

[33]  D. Ketchen,et al.  The role of information technology systems in the performance of mergers and acquisitions , 2016 .

[34]  Anna Syberfeldt,et al.  Dynamic operator instructions based on augmented reality and rule-based expert systems , 2016 .

[35]  Åsa Fast-Berglund,et al.  Perceived production complexity – understanding more than parts of a system , 2016 .

[36]  Günther Seliger,et al.  Increasing Knowledge and Skills for Assembly Processes through Interactive 3D-PDFs , 2016 .

[37]  Jiří Tupa,et al.  Requirements for Education and Qualification of People in Industry 4.0 , 2017 .

[38]  Paola Fantini,et al.  Jobs and Skills in Industry 4.0: An Exploratory Research , 2017, APMS.

[39]  Jack P. C. Verhoosel,et al.  Recipe-Based Engineering and Operator Support for Flexible Configuration of High-Mix Assembly , 2017, APMS.

[40]  Richard Hedman,et al.  A state of the art system for managing time data in manual assembly , 2017, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[41]  X. Wan The Negative Impact of Product Variety: Forecast Bias, Inventory Levels, and the Role of Vertical Integration , 2017 .

[42]  T. Cheng,et al.  Product variety management and supply chain performance: A capability perspective on their relationships and competitiveness implications , 2017 .

[43]  T. Laosirihongthong,et al.  Implementing industry 4.0 — A technological readiness perspective , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM).

[44]  Günther Schuh,et al.  Analysis of the Potential Benefits of Digital Assembly Instructions for Single and Small Batch Production , 2017, APMS.

[45]  Keith Case,et al.  Experimental study of cognitive aspects affecting human performance in manual assembly , 2017 .

[46]  Lennart Malmsköld,et al.  Data and Information Handling in Assembly Information Systems – A Current State Analysis , 2017 .

[47]  Li Da Xu,et al.  Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[48]  R. Glass,et al.  Identifying the barriers to Industrie 4.0 , 2018 .

[49]  Lennart Malmsköld,et al.  Enhancing Future Assembly Information Systems – Putting Theory into Practice , 2018 .

[50]  Åsa Fast-Berglund,et al.  ASSESSMENT BASED INFORMATION NEEDS IN MANUAL ASSEMBLY , 2018 .