The emergence and implementation of pool exclusion in spatial public goods game with heterogeneous ability-to-pay

Abstract Exploring the conditions and mechanisms for the emergence of cooperation in human society has important theoretical and practical significance. Social exclusion has been considered a powerful sanction for promoting and sustaining cooperation. However, whether the heterogeneity of the ability-to-pay of individuals can still favor cooperation when exclusion is introduced remains unclear. On the basis of this consideration, the dynamic cost of pool exclusion is taken into account in the public goods game, which focuses on the evolution process of each strategy in a square lattice. Specifically, we describe the cost of exclusion behavior as a function of payoff, while the probability of exclusion depends on the former. Through conducting Monte Carlo simulations, the effects of parameters on the evolution of cooperation are investigated. The results indicate that pool exclusion can promote cooperative behaviors within a wide range of parameters. Moreover, structured populations can form an effective alliance to sweep out defection, which requires a few excluders. This alliance continues to function even under strong dilemma strength. We further confirm that overinvestment in exclusion is unwanted. These results may help researchers better understand the emergence and implementation of social exclusion, and provide new insight into the analysis of the origin of cooperation for further exploration.

[1]  P. Oliver Rewards and Punishments as Selective Incentives for Collective Action: Theoretical Investigations , 1980, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  E. Fehr,et al.  Altruistic punishment in humans , 2002, Nature.

[3]  Matjaz Perc,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics in the public goods games with switching between punishment and exclusion , 2018, Chaos.

[4]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games , 2008, Nature.

[5]  Tatsuya Sasaki,et al.  Voluntary rewards mediate the evolution of pool punishment for maintaining public goods in large populations , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[6]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Alliance formation with exclusion in the spatial public goods game , 2017, Physical review. E.

[7]  M. Macy,et al.  Learning dynamics in social dilemmas , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Danyang Jia,et al.  The impact of neutral reward on cooperation in public good game , 2018, The European Physical Journal B.

[9]  J. M. Smith,et al.  The Logic of Animal Conflict , 1973, Nature.

[10]  Xianjia Wang,et al.  The effect of increasing returns to scale in public goods investment on threshold values of cooperation under social exclusion mechanism , 2019, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[11]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Second-order freeriding on antisocial punishment restores the effectiveness of prosocial punishment , 2017, bioRxiv.

[12]  Matjaž Perc,et al.  Sustainable institutionalized punishment requires elimination of second-order free-riders , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[13]  C. Hauert,et al.  Volunteering as Red Queen Mechanism for Cooperation in Public Goods Games , 2002, Science.

[14]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Punish, but not too hard: how costly punishment spreads in the spatial public goods game , 2010, 1007.0431.

[15]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Topology-independent impact of noise on cooperation in spatial public goods games. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  Jun Tanimoto,et al.  Fundamentals of Evolutionary Game Theory and its Applications , 2015 .

[17]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Knowing the past improves cooperation in the future , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[18]  J. Tanimoto,et al.  Dynamic utility: the sixth reciprocity mechanism for the evolution of cooperation , 2020, Royal Society Open Science.

[19]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary games and spatial chaos , 1992, Nature.

[20]  S. Kokubo,et al.  Insight into the so-called spatial reciprocity. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[21]  Elizabeth Pennisi,et al.  How Did Cooperative Behavior Evolve? , 2005, Science.

[22]  Y. Kamijo,et al.  Punishing second-order free riders before first-order free riders: The effect of pool punishment priority on cooperation , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[23]  Colin Norman,et al.  What Don't We Know? , 2005, Science.

[24]  György Szabó,et al.  Evolutionary prisoner's dilemma games with voluntary participation. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[25]  Ernesto Reuben,et al.  Enforcement of Contribution Norms in Public Good Games with Heterogeneous Populations , 2009, Games Econ. Behav..

[26]  Jun Tanimoto,et al.  Difference of reciprocity effect in two coevolutionary models of presumed two-player and multiplayer games. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[27]  Tatsuya Sasaki,et al.  Rewards and the evolution of cooperation in public good games , 2013, Biology Letters.

[28]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Sanctions as honest signals – The evolution of pool punishment by public sanctioning institutions , 2014, Journal of theoretical biology.

[29]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Coevolutionary Games - A Mini Review , 2009, Biosyst..

[30]  Torsten Röhl,et al.  An economic experiment reveals that humans prefer pool punishment to maintain the commons , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  Lata Gangadharan,et al.  Peer punishment promotes enforcement of bad social norms , 2017, Nature Communications.

[32]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Statistical Physics of Human Cooperation , 2017, ArXiv.

[33]  Ansgar Grüne,et al.  On the stability of cooperation under indirect reciprocity with first-order information , 2016, Games Econ. Behav..

[34]  C. Hauert,et al.  Punishment and reputation in spatial public goods games , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  Ming Yan,et al.  Environmental feedback promotes the evolution of cooperation in the structured populations. , 2019, Chaos.

[36]  M. Perc,et al.  Self-organization of punishment in structured populations , 2012, 1203.6900.

[37]  Tatsuya Sasaki,et al.  The evolution of cooperation by social exclusion , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  Xia Li,et al.  Social exclusion with dynamic cost on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games , 2020, Appl. Math. Comput..

[39]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[40]  Jun Tanimoto,et al.  Relationship between dilemma occurrence and the existence of a weakly dominant strategy in a two-player symmetric game , 2007, Biosyst..

[41]  Michael Doebeli,et al.  Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game , 2004, Nature.

[42]  Andrew M. Colman,et al.  The puzzle of cooperation , 2006, Nature.

[43]  R. Sugden The Economics of Rights, Co-Operation, and Welfare , 1986 .

[44]  G. Szabó,et al.  Evolutionary games on graphs , 2006, cond-mat/0607344.

[45]  S. Kokubo,et al.  Universal scaling for the dilemma strength in evolutionary games. , 2015, Physics of life reviews.

[46]  Bryan C. McCannon Rock Paper Scissors , 2007 .

[47]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[48]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Social learning promotes institutions for governing the commons , 2010, Nature.

[49]  Tatsuya Sasaki,et al.  Effect of assessment error and private information on stern-judging in indirect reciprocity , 2013, ArXiv.

[50]  Guofeng Zhang,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of the prisoner's dilemma with expellers , 2019, Journal of Physics Communications.

[51]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Probabilistic sharing solves the problem of costly punishment , 2014, ArXiv.

[52]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Phase Diagrams for the Spatial Public Goods Game with Pool-Punishment , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[53]  Nikos Nikiforakis,et al.  Asymmetric Enforcement of Cooperation in a Social Dilemma , 2010 .

[54]  K. Schlag Why Imitate, and If So, How?, : A Boundedly Rational Approach to Multi-armed Bandits , 1998 .

[55]  Tatsuya Sasaki,et al.  Commitment to Cooperation and Peer Punishment: Its Evolution , 2015, Games.

[56]  Jun Tanimoto,et al.  Influence of bolstering network reciprocity in the evolutionary spatial Prisoner’s Dilemma game: a perspective , 2018, The European Physical Journal B.

[57]  Jung-Kyoo Choi,et al.  Strategic reward and altruistic punishment support cooperation in a public goods game experiment , 2013 .

[58]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Competition and cooperation among different punishing strategies in the spatial public goods game , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[59]  Jun Tanimoto,et al.  Scaling the phase-planes of social dilemma strengths shows game-class changes in the five rules governing the evolution of cooperation , 2018, Royal Society Open Science.

[60]  Wojtek Przepiorka,et al.  Individual heterogeneity and costly punishment: a volunteer's dilemma , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[61]  M. Perc,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of cooperation in the public goods game with pool exclusion strategies , 2019, Nonlinear Dynamics.

[62]  Juan Wang,et al.  Evolution of cooperation in the spatial public goods game with adaptive reputation assortment , 2016 .

[63]  M. Jackson,et al.  A Strategic Model of Social and Economic Networks , 1996 .

[64]  T. Groves,et al.  Optimal Allocation of Public Goods: A Solution to the 'Free Rider Problem' , 1977 .

[65]  Laura K. Gee,et al.  Gun for hire: Delegated enforcement and peer punishment in public goods provision , 2012 .

[66]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of group interactions on structured populations: a review , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.