Identification of optimal strategies for sustainable energy management in Taiwan

SUMMARY In this study, an optimization model was developed for identifying optimal strategies in adjusting the existing fossil fuel-based energy structure in Taiwan. In this model, minimization of the total system cost was adopted as the objective function, which was subject to a series of constraints related to energy demand, greenhouse gas (GHG) emission restriction, and energy balance. Feasibility of several potential energy structures was also evaluated through tradeoff analysis between energy system costs and GHG emission targets. Three scenarios were established under several GHG emission restriction targets and potential nuclear power expansion options. Under the three scenarios, optimal energy allocation patterns were generated. In terms of the total energy system cost, the scenario that restricted GHG emissions and nuclear power growth would result in the highest one, with an average annual increase of 4.2% over the planning horizon. Also, the results indicated that the energy supply structure would be directly influenced by energy cost and GHG emission reduction targets. Scenario 2 would lead to the greatest dependence on clean energy, which would take up 41.8% in 2025. In comparison, with no restriction on nuclear energy, it would replace several energy sources and contribute to 34.0% of the total energy consumption. Significant reduction in GHG emission could be identified under scenario 2 due to the replacement of conventional fossil fuels with clean energies. Under scenario 3, GHG emission would be significantly reduced due to the adoption of nuclear power. After 2015, energy structure in Taiwan would be slightly adjusted due to synthetic impacts of energy demand growth and GHG emission restriction. The results also indicated that further studies would be necessarily needed for evaluating impacts and feasibilities of clean energy and nuclear power utilization in Taiwan. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  M. Thring World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[2]  A. Faaij,et al.  Efficiency and economy of wood-fired biomass energy systems in relation to scale regarding heat and power generation using combustion and gasification technologies , 2001 .

[3]  Ram Chandra,et al.  Optimal mix of renewable energy resources to meet the electrical energy demand in villages of Madhya Pradesh , 1998 .

[4]  S. Iniyan,et al.  An optimal renewable energy model for various end-uses , 2000 .

[5]  J. C. Powell,et al.  Sustainable cities - modelling urban energy supply and demand , 2005 .

[6]  S. Iniyan,et al.  The application of a Delphi technique in the linear programming optimization of future renewable energy options for India , 2003 .

[7]  Gordon H. Huang,et al.  Identification of optimal strategies for energy management systems planning under multiple uncertainties , 2009 .

[8]  Gordon H. Huang,et al.  An inexact optimization model for regional energy systems planning in the mixed stochastic and fuzzy environment , 2009 .

[9]  S. Iniyan,et al.  A review of energy models , 2006 .

[10]  L. Suganthi,et al.  Renewable energy in India — a modelling study for 2020–2021 , 2000 .

[11]  S. Iniyan,et al.  A methodology for the electrical energy system planning of Tamil Nadu state (India) , 2009 .

[12]  B. Jenkins A comment on the optimal sizing of a biomass utilization facility under constant and variable cost scaling , 1997 .

[13]  S. Iniyan,et al.  Energy models for commercial energy prediction and substitution of renewable energy sources , 2006 .

[14]  Taraneh Sowlati,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of wood biomass boilers for the greenhouse industry , 2009 .

[15]  Gordon H. Huang,et al.  Planning of energy system management and GHG-emission control in the Municipality of Beijing--An inexact-dynamic stochastic programming model , 2009 .

[16]  Taraneh Sowlati,et al.  Techno‐economic analysis of renewable energy source options for a district heating project , 2010 .

[17]  Gordon H. Huang,et al.  A dynamic inexact energy systems planning model for supporting greenhouse-gas emission management and sustainable renewable energy development under uncertainty—A case study for the City of Waterloo, Canada , 2009 .

[18]  André Caillé Deciding the Future: Energy Policy Scenarios to 2050 , 2007 .

[19]  Michel Moreaux,et al.  Energy Substitutions, Climate Change and Carbon Sinks , 2008 .

[20]  M. Drozdz Polish energy-system modernisation , 2003 .

[21]  Mitchell J. Small,et al.  Enabling optimal energy options under the Clean Development Mechanism , 2007 .

[22]  Paul Upham,et al.  Integrated assessment of bioelectricity technology options , 2009 .

[23]  L. Suganthi,et al.  Reliability based socio economic optimal renewable energy model for India , 2000 .

[24]  Peter Golding,et al.  Multi-objective optimization for capacity expansion of regional power-generation systems: Case study of far west Texas , 2008 .

[25]  Q. G. Lin,et al.  IFTEM: An interval-fuzzy two-stage stochastic optimization model for regional energy systems planning under uncertainty , 2009 .

[26]  W. Dougherty,et al.  Greenhouse gas reduction benefits and costs of a large-scale transition to hydrogen in the USA , 2009 .

[27]  Sampo Soimakallio,et al.  Greenhouse gas balances of transportation biofuels, electricity and heat generation in Finland-Dealing with the uncertainties , 2009 .

[28]  Ye Xu,et al.  Regional-scale electric power system planning under uncertainty—A multistage interval-stochastic integer linear programming approach , 2010 .

[29]  Yoshikuni Yoshida,et al.  Comprehensive comparison of efficiency and CO2 emissions between biomass energy conversion technologies—position of supercritical water gasification in biomass technologies , 2003 .

[30]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Air pollution reduction via use of green energy sources for electricity and hydrogen production , 2007 .

[31]  Johannes Schmidt,et al.  Potential of biomass‐fired combined heat and power plants considering the spatial distribution of biomass supply and heat demand , 2010 .

[32]  Bent Sørensen,et al.  A sustainable energy future: Construction of demand and renewable energy supply scenarios , 2008 .

[33]  Ulrich Fahl,et al.  Role of energy efficiency standards in reducing CO2 emissions in Germany: An assessment with TIMES , 2007 .

[34]  Martin Pehnt,et al.  Dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA) of renewable energy technologies , 2006 .

[35]  Jyotirmay Mathur,et al.  Dynamic energy analysis to assess maximum growth rates in developing power generation capacity: case study of India , 2004 .

[36]  Guohe Huang,et al.  Development of an optimization model for energy systems planning in the Region of Waterloo , 2008 .

[37]  Guohe Huang,et al.  Community-scale renewable energy systems planning under uncertainty—An interval chance-constrained programming approach , 2009 .