Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation.

OBJECT The authors have developed a novel technique for percutaneous fusion in which standard microendoscopic discectomy is modified. Based on data obtained in their cadaveric studies they considered that this minimally invasive interbody fusion could be safely implemented clinically. The authors describe their initial experience with a microendoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (METLIF) technique, with regard to safety in the placement of percutaneous instrumentation, perioperative morbidity, and early postoperative results. METHODS The METLIF procedure was performed unilaterally in 20 patients with single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis or pure mechanical back pain with endoscopic assistance, hemilaminectomy, unilateral facetectomy, and microdiscectomy. Two interbody grafts were placed via the lateral exposure of the disc space. Bilateral percutaneous pedicle screws were then inserted. Compared with patients who had undergone single-level posterior LIF at the same institutions, intraoperative blood loss, hospital length of stay (LOS), and postoperative narcotic agent use were significantly lower in the METLIF group. The mean LOS for the percutaneous fusion group was 3.4 days (5.1 days in those who underwent PLIF; p < 0.02). There have been no procedure-related complications in this series to date. CONCLUSIONS The METLIF technique provided an option for percutaneous interbody fusion similar to that in open surgery while minimizing destruction to adjacent tissues. This technique was safe and exhibited a trend toward decreased intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, total narcotic use, and the risk of transfusion.

[1]  R. Fessler,et al.  Minimally Invasive Cervical Microendoscopic Foraminotomy: An Initial Clinical Experience , 2002, Neurosurgery.

[2]  K. Shitoto,et al.  Comparative Study of Iliac Bone Graft and Carbon Cage with Local Bone Graft in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic surgery.

[3]  A. Moskowitz,et al.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. , 2002, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[4]  R. B. Cloward Spondylolisthesis: treatment by laminectomy and posterior interbody fusion. , 1981, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  Yoshiharu Kawaguchi,et al.  Back Muscle Injury After Posterior Lumbar Spine Surgery: Topographic Evaluation of Intramuscular Pressure and Blood Flow in the Porcine Back Muscle During Surgery , 1996, Spine.

[6]  V. Rajaraman,et al.  Visceral and vascular complications resulting from anterior lumbar interbody fusion. , 1999, Journal of neurosurgery.

[7]  R. Fessler,et al.  Minimally invasive percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion. , 2003, Neurosurgery.

[8]  D. Ohnmeiss,et al.  Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion , 1988, Spine.

[9]  J. Brantigan,et al.  Lumbar interbody fusion using the Brantigan I/F cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion and the variable pedicle screw placement system: two-year results from a Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption clinical trial. , 2000, Spine.

[10]  F. Castro,et al.  Anterior/posterior lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of complications and predictive factors. , 2001, Journal of spinal disorders.

[11]  Paul,et al.  The Incidence of Complications in Endoscopic Anterior Thoracolumbar Spinal Reconstructive Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Study Comprising the First 100 Consecutive Cases , 1995, Spine.

[12]  T. Stonecipher,et al.  Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Facet-Screw Fixation , 1989, Spine.

[13]  R. Fraser,et al.  Interbody, Posterior, and Combined Lumbar Fusions , 1995, Spine.

[14]  R. Hacker Comparison of Interbody Fusion Approaches for Disabling Low Back Pain , 1997, Spine.

[15]  R. Fessler,et al.  A Minimally Invasive Technique for Decompression of the Lumbar Spine , 2002, Spine.

[16]  Avinash G. Patwardhan,et al.  Comparison of Posterior and Transforaminal Approaches to Lumbar Interbody Fusion , 2001, Spine.

[17]  T. Whitecloud,et al.  Transforaminal interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine: a financial analysis. , 2001, Journal of spinal disorders.

[18]  H. Matsui,et al.  Back Muscle Injury After Posterior Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Histologic and Enzymatic Analysis , 1996, Spine.

[19]  John R. Johnson,et al.  Perioperative Complications of Anterior Procedures on the Spine*† , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[20]  R. B. Cloward The treatment of ruptured lumbar intervertebral discs by vertebral body fusion. I. Indications, operative technique, after care. , 1953, Journal of neurosurgery.

[21]  W. J. Elias,et al.  Complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion when using a titanium threaded cage device. , 2000, Journal of neurosurgery.

[22]  G. Ma Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with specialized instruments. , 1985, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  E. Transfeldt,et al.  Video-Assisted Versus Open Anterior Lumbar Spine Fusion Surgery: A Comparison of Four Techniques and Complications in 135 Patients , 2003, Spine.

[24]  H. Tiusanen,et al.  Retrograde ejaculation after anterior interbody lumbar fusion , 2004, European Spine Journal.

[25]  Maurice M. Smith,et al.  Microendoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Technical Note , 2002, Neurosurgery.

[26]  P. Mummaneni,et al.  Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique, Complications, and Early Results , 2001, Neurosurgery.

[27]  Kevin T Foley,et al.  Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine: preliminary clinical results. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[28]  P M Lin,et al.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion technique: complications and pitfalls. , 1985, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[29]  Safdar N. Khan,et al.  Bone morphogenetic proteins: relevance in spine surgery. , 2002, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[30]  H. Larocca,et al.  The Failed Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion , 1991, Spine.

[31]  Jeffrey C. Wang,et al.  Single-Level Lumbar Spine Fusion: A Comparison of Anterior and Posterior Approaches , 2002, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[32]  S. L. Griffith,et al.  The Bagby and Kuslich Method of Lumbar Interbody Fusion: History, Techniques, and 2‐Year Follow‐up Results of a United States Prospective, Multicenter Trial , 1998, Spine.