Psychometric properties of novel instrument for evaluating ambient air pollution health literacy in adults

We aimed to develop and validate a comprehensive ambient air pollution health literacy instrument. We developed items covering 12 constructs, four information competencies within three health domains. In this population-based telephone interview study, probability proportional to size sampling and random digit dialing were used to determine participants. We conducted confirmatory factor analysis to analyze model fits and used content validity indices and Cronbach’s alpha to measure content validity and internal consistency reliability. Twenty-four items were generated, and a total of 1,297 participants were recruited. A theoretically conceived 12-factor model was supported (root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.068, comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.039, standardized root mean square residual [SRMR] = 0.934, normed fit index [NFI] = 0.914, Tucker–Lewis index [TLI] = 0.902). Content validity indices for relevance, importance, and unambiguity were 0.97, 0.99, and 0.94, respectively. Internal consistency reliability assessed by Cronbach’s alpha was 0.93. The ambient air pollution health literacy instrument is valid and reliable and can be used in community residents. The novel instrument can guide the stakeholders and the authority to tailor and implement effective and appropriate interventions and actions, empowering the public to manage hazardous exposure and improving AAPHL of the public.

[1]  S. Deguen,et al.  Adverse Birth Outcomes Related to NO2 and PM Exposure: European Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[2]  J. Christensen,et al.  Intracranial tumors of the central nervous system and air pollution – a nationwide case-control study from Denmark , 2020, Environmental Health.

[3]  Yitayal Addis Alemayehu,et al.  Exposure to urban particulate matter and its association with human health risks , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[4]  S. Odonkor,et al.  Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceptions of Air Pollution in Accra, Ghana: A Critical Survey , 2020, Journal of environmental and public health.

[5]  M. Lichtveld,et al.  Advancing Environmental Health Literacy: Validated Scales of General Environmental Health and Environmental Media-Specific Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviors , 2019, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[6]  J. Magnani,et al.  New technologies, new disparities: The intersection of electronic health and digital health literacy. , 2019, International journal of cardiology.

[7]  A. Ramírez,et al.  Public Awareness of Air Pollution and Health Threats: Challenges and Opportunities for Communication Strategies To Improve Environmental Health Literacy , 2019, Journal of health communication.

[8]  A. Hoover Defining Environmental Health Literacy , 2018, Environmental Health Literacy.

[9]  Y. Takane,et al.  Commentaries on the Ten Most Highly Cited Psychometrika Articles from 1936 to the Present , 2016, Psychometrika.

[10]  Symma Finn,et al.  The Emergence of Environmental Health Literacy—From Its Roots to Its Future Potential , 2015, Environmental health perspectives.

[11]  H. Ishikawa,et al.  Comprehensive health literacy in Japan is lower than in Europe: a validated Japanese-language assessment of health literacy , 2015, BMC Public Health.

[12]  Gerardine Doyle,et al.  Measuring health literacy in populations: illuminating the design and development process of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q) , 2013, BMC Public Health.

[13]  Ellen Uiters,et al.  Health literacy of Dutch adults: a cross sectional survey , 2013, BMC Public Health.

[14]  Gerardine Doyle,et al.  Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models , 2012, BMC Public Health.

[15]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[16]  D. Streiner Starting at the Beginning: An Introduction to Coefficient Alpha and Internal Consistency , 2003, Journal of personality assessment.

[17]  D. Nutbeam Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century , 2000 .

[18]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha , 1997 .

[19]  J. M. Cortina,et al.  What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications , 1993 .

[20]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[21]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[23]  E. Bettinghaus,et al.  Health promotion and the knowledge-attitude-behavior continuum. , 1986, Preventive medicine.

[24]  L. Aiken Three Coefficients for Analyzing the Reliability and Validity of Ratings , 1985 .

[25]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[26]  L. Tucker,et al.  A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis , 1973 .

[27]  G. Forino,et al.  A citizen science approach for enhancing public understanding of air pollution , 2020 .

[28]  Hsien-Ho Lin,et al.  Burden of disease attributable to ambient fine particulate matter exposure in Taiwan. , 2017, Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi.

[29]  A. Tenbrunsel,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2013 .

[30]  W. Liang,et al.  Association between daily mortality from respiratory and cardiovascular diseases and air pollution in Taiwan. , 2009, Environmental research.

[31]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[32]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .