Highly multiplexed targeted proteomics using precise control of peptide retention time

Large‐scale proteomics applications using SRM analysis on triple quadrupole mass spectrometers present new challenges to LC‐MS/MS experimental design. Despite the automation of building large‐scale LC‐SRM methods, the increased numbers of targeted peptides can compromise the balance between sensitivity and selectivity. To facilitate large target numbers, time‐scheduled SRM transition acquisition is performed. Previously published results have demonstrated incorporation of a well‐characterized set of synthetic peptides enabled chromatographic characterization of the elution profile for most endogenous peptides. We have extended this application of peptide trainer kits to not only build SRM methods but to facilitate real‐time elution profile characterization that enables automated adjustment of the scheduled detection windows. Incorporation of dynamic retention time adjustments better facilitate targeted assays lasting several days without the need for constant supervision. This paper provides an overview of how the dynamic retention correction approach identifies and corrects for commonly observed LC variations. This adjustment dramatically improves robustness in targeted discovery experiments as well as routine quantification experiments.

[1]  Lukas N. Mueller,et al.  Full Dynamic Range Proteome Analysis of S. cerevisiae by Targeted Proteomics , 2009, Cell.

[2]  Oliver Kohlbacher,et al.  Statistical learning of peptide retention behavior in chromatographic separations: a new kernel-based approach for computational proteomics , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[3]  Henry H. N. Lam,et al.  A database of mass spectrometric assays for the yeast proteome , 2008, Nature Methods.

[4]  B. Domon,et al.  Selected reaction monitoring applied to proteomics. , 2011, Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS.

[5]  R. Beavis,et al.  An Improved Model for Prediction of Retention Times of Tryptic Peptides in Ion Pair Reversed-phase HPLC , 2004, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[6]  Gennifer E. Merrihew,et al.  Expediting the development of targeted SRM assays: using data from shotgun proteomics to automate method development. , 2009, Journal of proteome research.

[7]  O. Krokhin,et al.  Sequence-specific retention calculator. Algorithm for peptide retention prediction in ion-pair RP-HPLC: application to 300- and 100-A pore size C18 sorbents. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[8]  K. Standing,et al.  Predicting retention time shifts associated with variation of the gradient slope in peptide RP-HPLC. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[9]  Ying Xu,et al.  Improved peptide elution time prediction for reversed-phase liquid chromatography-MS by incorporating peptide sequence information. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[10]  Lennart Martens,et al.  PRIDE: new developments and new datasets , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[11]  V. Spicer,et al.  Peptide retention standards and hydrophobicity indexes in reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography of peptides. , 2009, Analytical chemistry.

[12]  Christoph H Borchers,et al.  Multiple Reaction Monitoring-based, Multiplexed, Absolute Quantitation of 45 Proteins in Human Plasma* , 2009, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[13]  Bindu Nanduri,et al.  Prediction of peptides observable by mass spectrometry applied at the experimental set level , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[14]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Increased Selectivity, Analytical Precision, and Throughput in Targeted Proteomics , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[15]  Michael J MacCoss,et al.  Improving tandem mass spectrum identification using peptide retention time prediction across diverse chromatography conditions. , 2007, Analytical chemistry.

[16]  Henry H. N. Lam,et al.  PeptideAtlas: a resource for target selection for emerging targeted proteomics workflows , 2008, EMBO reports.

[17]  W. Ens,et al.  Sequence-specific retention calculator. A family of peptide retention time prediction algorithms in reversed-phase HPLC: applicability to various chromatographic conditions and columns. , 2007, Analytical chemistry.

[18]  Christoph H Borchers,et al.  Multi-site assessment of the precision and reproducibility of multiple reaction monitoring–based measurements of proteins in plasma , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  Scott Peterman,et al.  Mass spectrometric discovery and selective reaction monitoring (SRM) of putative protein biomarker candidates in first trimester Trisomy 21 maternal serum. , 2011, Journal of proteome research.

[20]  Robertson Craig,et al.  Open source system for analyzing, validating, and storing protein identification data. , 2004, Journal of proteome research.

[21]  L Liotta,et al.  Platform for establishing interlaboratory reproducibility of selected reaction monitoring-based mass spectrometry peptide assays. , 2010, Journal of proteome research.

[22]  J. Mesirov,et al.  Prediction of high-responding peptides for targeted protein assays by mass spectrometry , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[23]  Daniel B. Martin,et al.  Computational prediction of proteotypic peptides for quantitative proteomics , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.