SPLIT HOPKISO PRESSURE BAR IMPULSE EXPERIMETAL MEASUREMET WITH UMERICAL VALIDATIO

Materials and their development process are highly dependent on proper experimental testing under wide range of loading within which high-strain rate conditions play a very significant role. For such dynamic loading Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) is widely used for investigating the dynamic behavio r of various materials. The presented paper is focused on the SHPB impulse measurement process using experiment al and numerical methods. One of the main problems occurring during tests are oscillations recorded by the strain gauges which adversely affect results. Thus, it is desired to obtain the peak shape in the incident bar of SHPB as “smooth” as possible without any distortions. Such impulse characteristics can be achieved using several shaping techniques, e.g. by placing a special shaper between two bars, which in fact was performed by the authors experimentally and subsequently was validated using computational methods.

[1]  C. Rubio-Gonzalez,et al.  Finite-element simulation of wave propagation and dispersion in Hopkinson bar test , 2006 .

[2]  Joseph R. Davis Properties and selection : nonferrous alloys and special-purpose materials , 1990 .

[3]  B. Hopkinson A method of measuring the pressure produced in the detonation of high explosives or by the impact of bullets , 1914 .

[4]  R Das,et al.  Modelling Stress Wave Propagation and Triaxial Compression Test Using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics , 2007 .

[5]  Nazia Tasneem,et al.  STUDY OF WAVE SHAPING TECHNIQUES OF SPLIT HOPKINSON PRESSURE BAR USING FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS , 2005 .

[6]  H. Kolsky An Investigation of the Mechanical Properties of Materials at very High Rates of Loading , 1949 .

[7]  B. Song,et al.  Dynamic stress equilibration in split Hopkinson pressure bar tests on soft materials , 2004 .

[8]  Weinong W Chen,et al.  Pulse shaping techniques for testing brittle materials with a split hopkinson pressure bar , 2002 .

[9]  Kenneth S. Vecchio,et al.  Improved Pulse Shaping to Achieve Constant Strain Rate and Stress Equilibrium in Split-Hopkinson Pressure Bar Testing , 2007 .

[10]  D. Agard,et al.  Microtubule nucleation by γ-tubulin complexes , 2011, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[11]  K. Graff Wave Motion in Elastic Solids , 1975 .

[12]  J. Małachowski,et al.  Numerical study for determination of pulse shaping design variables in SHPB apparatus , 2013 .

[13]  J. Zhu,et al.  A Method of Combined SHPB Technique and BP Neural Network to Study Impact Response of Materials , 2006 .

[14]  Zhu Ping Inverse approach to determine piston profile from impact stress waveform on given non-uniform rod , 2001 .

[15]  T. Z. Blazynski High Energy Rate Fabrication , 1985 .

[16]  James F. Doyle,et al.  Wave Propagation in Structures: Spectral Analysis Using Fast Discrete Fourier Transforms , 1997 .

[17]  D. Frew,et al.  Dynamic Response of Brittle Materials from Penetration and Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Experiments , 2001 .

[18]  M. J. Ashrafi,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigation of pulse-shaped split Hopkinson pressure bar test , 2012 .

[19]  D. J. Parry,et al.  Hopkinson bar pulse smoothing , 1995 .

[20]  Xibing Li,et al.  Dynamic Characteristics of Granite Subjected to Intermediate Loading Rate , 2005 .

[21]  Jason R. Foley,et al.  Split Hopkinson Bar Experiments of Preloaded Interfaces , 2010 .

[22]  D J Parry,et al.  Materials testing at high constant strain rates , 1982 .

[23]  R. Davies A critical study of the Hopkinson pressure bar , 1948, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[24]  B. Song,et al.  SPLIT HOPKINSON PRESSURE BAR TECHNIQUES FOR CHARACTERIZING SOFT MATERIALS , 2005 .

[25]  N. Bloembergen,et al.  The Experimental Method , 1948 .

[26]  S. Kok,et al.  A tapered striker pulse shaping technique for uniform strain rate dynamic compression of bovine bone , 2009 .

[27]  M. J. Forrestal,et al.  Dynamic Compression Testing of Soft Materials , 2002 .