Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Compressed Screen Content Videos

With the widespread of application scenarios such as remote office and cloud collaboration, Screen Content Video (SCV) and its processing which show different characteristics from Natural Scene Video (NSV) and its processing, are increasingly attracting researcher’s attention. Among these processing techniques, quality evaluation plays an important role in various media processing systems. Despite extensive research on general Image Quality Assessment (IQA) and Video Quality Assessment (VQA), quality assessment of SCVs remains undeveloped. In particular, SCVs always suffer from compression degradations in all kinds of application scenarios. In this article, we first study subjective SCV quality assessment. Specifically, we first construct a Compressed Screen Content Video Quality (CSCVQ) database with 165 distorted SCVs compressed from 11 most common screen application scenarios using the H.264, HEVC and HEVC-SCC formats. Twenty subjects were recruited to participate in the subjective test on the CSCVQ database. Then we study objective SCV quality assessment and propose a SCV quality measure. We observe that localized protruding information such as curves and dots can be well captured by the local relative standard deviation which then can be used to measure the intra-frame quality. Base on this observation, we develop a MutiScale Relative Standard Deviation Similarity (MS-RSDS) model for SCV quality evaluation. In our model, the relative standard deviation similarity between the reference and distorted SCVs is measured from frame differences between two adjacent frames, which can capture the spatiotemporal distortions accurately. A multiscale strategy is also applied to strengthen the original single-scale model. Extensive experiments are performed to compare the proposed model with the most popular and state-of-the-art quality assessment models on the CSCVQ database. Experimental results show that our proposed MS-RSDS model which has relatively low computation complexity, outperforms other IQA/VQA models.

[1]  Yuan Yan Tang,et al.  Scalable Compression of Stream Cipher Encrypted Images Through Context-Adaptive Sampling , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[2]  Anil C. Kokaram,et al.  A Perceptual Quality Metric for Videos Distorted by Spatially Correlated Noise , 2016, ACM Multimedia.

[3]  Guangtao Zhai,et al.  Perceptual image quality assessment: a survey , 2020, Science China Information Sciences.

[4]  Xiongkuo Min,et al.  A Multimodal Saliency Model for Videos With High Audio-Visual Correspondence , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[5]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  A Statistical Evaluation of Recent Full Reference Image Quality Assessment Algorithms , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[6]  Kai Zeng,et al.  Objective Quality Assessment and Perceptual Compression of Screen Content Images , 2018, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[7]  Yutao Liu,et al.  Blind Image Quality Estimation via Distortion Aggravation , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[8]  Xiongkuo Min,et al.  Objective Quality Evaluation of Dehazed Images , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[9]  Le Yang,et al.  Modeling the Screen Content Image Quality via Multiscale Edge Attention Similarity , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[10]  Jianjun Lei,et al.  Fast Intra Prediction Based on Content Property Analysis for Low Complexity HEVC-Based Screen Content Coding , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[11]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Information Content Weighting for Perceptual Image Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[12]  Rajiv Soundararajan,et al.  Video Quality Assessment by Reduced Reference Spatio-Temporal Entropic Differencing , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[13]  Xiongkuo Min,et al.  A Wavelet-Predominant Algorithm Can Evaluate Quality of THz Security Image and Identify Its Usability , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[14]  Guangtao Zhai,et al.  The Prediction of Saliency Map for Head and Eye Movements in 360 Degree Images , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[15]  Xiongkuo Min,et al.  Blind Quality Assessment Based on Pseudo-Reference Image , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[16]  Guangtao Zhai,et al.  Study of Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Audio-Visual Signals , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  Xiao-Ping Zhang,et al.  Adaptive denoising based on SURE risk , 1998, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[18]  Kai-Kuang Ma,et al.  Gradient Direction for Screen Content Image Quality Assessment , 2016, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[19]  Wen Gao,et al.  Image Interpolation via Graph-Based Bayesian Label Propagation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[20]  Xiongkuo Min,et al.  Free-energy principle inspired visual quality assessment: An overview , 2019, Digit. Signal Process..

[21]  Weisi Lin,et al.  A Fast Reliable Image Quality Predictor by Fusing Micro- and Macro-Structures , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[22]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment , 2003, The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003.

[23]  Daniel Thalmann,et al.  Evaluating Quality of Screen Content Images Via Structural Variation Analysis , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[24]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Subjective quality assessment of Screen Content Images , 2014, 2014 Sixth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).

[25]  Weisi Lin,et al.  Perceptual Quality Assessment of Screen Content Images , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[26]  Sujit Dey,et al.  Adaptive Mobile Cloud Computing to Enable Rich Mobile Multimedia Applications , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[27]  Jean-Bernard Martens,et al.  Quality asessment of coded images using numerical category scaling , 1995, Other Conferences.

[28]  Jizheng Xu,et al.  Overview of the Emerging HEVC Screen Content Coding Extension , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[29]  Weisi Lin,et al.  Learning a blind quality evaluation engine of screen content images , 2016, Neurocomputing.

[30]  Gustavo de Veciana,et al.  An information fidelity criterion for image quality assessment using natural scene statistics , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[31]  David Zhang,et al.  FSIM: A Feature Similarity Index for Image Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[32]  Praful Gupta,et al.  SpEED-QA: Spatial Efficient Entropic Differencing for Image and Video Quality , 2017, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[33]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Video quality assessment using a statistical model of human visual speed perception. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[34]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image information and visual quality , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[35]  Damon M. Chandler,et al.  ViS3: an algorithm for video quality assessment via analysis of spatial and spatiotemporal slices , 2014, J. Electronic Imaging.

[36]  Xiongkuo Min,et al.  Fixation prediction through multimodal analysis , 2015, 2015 Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP).

[37]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Gradient Magnitude Similarity Deviation: A Highly Efficient Perceptual Image Quality Index , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[38]  Wen Gao,et al.  Progressive Image Denoising Through Hybrid Graph Laplacian Regularization: A Unified Framework , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[39]  Xiongkuo Min,et al.  Saliency-induced reduced-reference quality index for natural scene and screen content images , 2018, Signal Process..

[40]  Xiao-Ping Zhang,et al.  Color Image Watermarking Using Multidimensional Fourier Transforms , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[41]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Unified Blind Quality Assessment of Compressed Natural, Graphic, and Screen Content Images , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[42]  Yu-Wen Huang,et al.  Inter-Palette Coding in Screen Content Coding , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[43]  Snjezana Rimac-Drlje,et al.  Influence of temporal pooling method on the objective video quality evaluation , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting.

[44]  Ke Gu,et al.  Perceptual Reduced-Reference Visual Quality Assessment for Contrast Alteration , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[45]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Video quality assessment based on structural distortion measurement , 2004, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[46]  Xiongkuo Min,et al.  Quality Evaluation of Image Dehazing Methods Using Synthetic Hazy Images , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[47]  Sugato Chakravarty,et al.  Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures , 1995 .

[48]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Motion Tuned Spatio-Temporal Quality Assessment of Natural Videos , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[49]  Wen Gao,et al.  Just Noticeable Difference Estimation for Screen Content Images , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[50]  Hongyu Li,et al.  VSI: A Visual Saliency-Induced Index for Perceptual Image Quality Assessment , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[51]  Xiongkuo Min,et al.  The prediction of head and eye movement for 360 degree images , 2018, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[52]  Damon M. Chandler,et al.  A spatiotemporal most-apparent-distortion model for video quality assessment , 2011, 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[53]  Xiongkuo Min,et al.  A Metric for Light Field Reconstruction, Compression, and Display Quality Evaluation , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[54]  Ke Gu,et al.  No-Reference Quality Assessment of Screen Content Pictures , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.