The development of a decision support framework for a quantitative risk assessment in multimodal green logistics: an empirical study

The objective of this research was to develop a decision support framework (DSF) to assess quantitative risk in multimodal green logistics. This risk assessment is the combination of a number of models, the failure mode and effects analysis, the risk contour plot, the quantitative risk assessment, the analytic hierarchy process and the data envelopment analysis which can support a user to perform risk assessment in various decisions. The contribution of this research is that the risk assessment model can generate an optimal green logistics route in accordance with weight from the user. The highlight of this DSF is that the quantitative assessment model can reduce bias on risk assessment of logistics route. An in-depth case study, recommendations, limitations and further research are also provided.

[1]  Markku Tuominen,et al.  Risk analysis and assessment in network environments: A dyadic case study , 2002 .

[2]  Suzanne D. Pawlowski,et al.  The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[3]  David Olwell,et al.  Reliability Engineering and Risk Analysis , 2001, Technometrics.

[4]  F. Liu,et al.  The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier , 2005 .

[5]  J. Hallikas,et al.  Risk assessment in multimodal supply chains , 2012 .

[6]  D. Barends,et al.  Risk analysis of analytical validations by probabilistic modification of FMEA. , 2012, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[7]  Markku Tuominen,et al.  The development of a decision support system in multimodal transportation routing within Greater Mekong sub-region countries , 2012 .

[8]  Amir Zakery Logistics Future Trends , 2011 .

[9]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[10]  Desheng Dash Wu,et al.  A note to ‘Enterprise risk management: a DEA VaR approach in vendor selection’: a response to Wei and Wang and model extension , 2011 .

[11]  Nihan Akyelken Green Logistics: Improving the Environmental Sustainability of Logistics , 2011 .

[12]  Matteo Giacomo Maria Kalchschmidt,et al.  A model to evaluate upstream vulnerability , 2014 .

[13]  Taho Yang,et al.  A hierarchical AHP/DEA methodology for the facilities layout design problem , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Christopher S. Tang,et al.  Researchers' Perspectives on Supply Chain Risk Management , 2011 .

[15]  C. Weber A data envelopment analysis approach to measuring vendor performance , 1996 .

[16]  Kuei-Hu Chang,et al.  Evaluate the orderings of risk for failure problems using a more general RPN methodology , 2009, Microelectron. Reliab..

[17]  Arup Das,et al.  A comprehensive risk assessment framework for offsite transportation of inflammable hazardous waste. , 2012, Journal of hazardous materials.

[18]  Michael Todinov,et al.  Risk-Based Reliability Analysis and Generic Principles for Risk Reduction , 2006 .

[19]  H. Ishii,et al.  The appropriate total ranking method using DEA for multiple categorized purposes , 2002 .

[20]  Manish Verma Railroad transportation of dangerous goods: A conditional exposure approach to minimize transport risk , 2011 .

[21]  Markku Tuominen,et al.  A framework for group decision support systems: An application in the evaluation of information technology for logistics firms , 2006 .

[22]  Shunsuke Managi,et al.  Input and output biased technological change in US agriculture , 2004 .

[23]  J. Landeta Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences , 2006 .

[24]  John Andrews,et al.  Reliability and Risk Assessment , 1994 .

[25]  Douglas Landoll The Security Risk Assessment Handbook , 2005 .

[26]  R Ramanathan,et al.  Comparative Risk Assessment of Energy Supply Technologies: a Data Envelopment Analysis Approach , 2001 .

[27]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS , 2008 .

[28]  M. Christopher,et al.  Supply chain risk management: outlining an agenda for future research , 2003 .

[29]  Charles Leake,et al.  The Pareto principle in organizational decision making , 2002 .

[30]  Vipul Jain,et al.  Quantifying risks in a supply chain through integration of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS , 2013 .

[31]  R. Banomyong,et al.  Multimodal transport: the case of Laotian garment exporters , 2001 .

[32]  Ming-Chih Tsai,et al.  Political risk assessment of five East Asian ports--the viewpoints of global carriers , 2005 .

[33]  Muhammad Rizwan,et al.  Application of 80/20 rule in software engineering Waterfall Model , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies.

[34]  Gholam R. Amin,et al.  Railway station site selection using analytical hierarchy process and data envelopment analysis , 2010, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[35]  Jianjun Zhang,et al.  Using GIS to assess the risks of hazardous materials transport in networks , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[36]  S. Talluri,et al.  Assessing the Efficiency of Risk Mitigation Strategies in Supply Chains , 2013 .

[37]  Boris Bemeleit,et al.  Risk Management in self controlled logistic processes , 2004 .

[38]  Antonella Petrillo,et al.  Multi-criteria risk analysis to improve safety in manufacturing systems , 2012 .

[39]  Chia-Wei Hsu,et al.  Risk evaluation of green components to hazardous substance using FMEA and FAHP , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[40]  Nan Liu,et al.  Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[41]  Gigliola Spadoni,et al.  A numerical procedure for assessing risks from road transport of dangerous substances , 1995 .

[42]  A. Horvath,et al.  The Environmental Impacts of Logistics Systems and Options for Mitigation , 2006 .

[43]  H. Thomas,et al.  Risk analysis and its applications , 1983 .

[44]  Jun Liu,et al.  An integrated AHP-DEA methodology for bridge risk assessment , 2008, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[45]  Nicolás J. Scenna,et al.  Road risk analysis due to the transportation of chlorine in Rosario city , 2005, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[46]  Mohammad Modarres Reliability engineering and risk analysis , 1999 .