Simple Feature Frequency versus Feature Validity Models of Formation of Prototypes

The typicality of a concept instance is related to the frequency with which its constituent features occur among all instances of the focal concept and possibly of other contrasting concepts. According to a simple frequency model, the prototype consists of the features that have occurred most often among instances of the focal concept. But according to a validity model, the prototype has the features that have occurred frequently among focal instances and, at the same time, infrequently among instances of contrast categories. By this account, the extent to which features overlap among focal and contrast instances is important in prototype formation. Here the feature frequencies among focal instances and the degree to which these features overlapped with contrast instances were manipulated. Twenty undergraduate college students first studied instances of the contrast category and then instances of the focal category. Next, they provided typicality ratings, frequency estimates of whole stimuli, and frequency estimates of features. All three measures supported the prediction of a simple frequency model of prototype formation.

[1]  Ronald T. Kellogg,et al.  Feature frequency and the acquisition of natural concepts. , 1978 .

[2]  P. G. Neumann An attribute frequency model for the abstraction of prototypes , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[3]  G. Bower,et al.  Presolution dimensional shifts in concept identification: A test of the sampling with replacement axiom in all-or-none models ☆ , 1966 .

[4]  L. Beach Cue probabilism and inference behavior. , 1964 .

[5]  L. E. Bourne,et al.  Frequency analysis of attribute identification , 1976 .

[6]  G. Bower,et al.  Storage and later recognition of exemplars of concepts , 1973 .

[7]  M. Posner,et al.  Retention of Abstract Ideas. , 1970 .

[8]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  M. Posner,et al.  On the genesis of abstract ideas. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  R. Lasky,et al.  Transformation rules in concept learning , 1978, Memory & cognition.

[11]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  D. Homa,et al.  Integrative and metric properties of abstracted information as a function of category discriminability, instance variability, and experience. , 1977 .

[13]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  Pattern recognition and categorization , 1972 .

[14]  J. Bransford,et al.  Abstraction of visual patterns. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  F. Hayes-Roth,et al.  Concept learning and the recognition and classification of exemplars , 1977 .

[16]  Ian Begg,et al.  Estimation of word frequency in continuous and discrete tasks. , 1974 .

[17]  P. G. Neumann Visual prototype formation with discontinuous representation of dimensions of variability , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[18]  L. E. Bourne,et al.  Bases of acceptability ratings in quasinaturalistic concept tasks , 1978 .

[19]  G. Bower,et al.  REVERSALS PRIOR TO SOLUTION IN CONCEPT IDENTIFICATION. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.