Pressure ulcer management in paraplegic patients with a novel negative pressure device: a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE A randomised controlled trial to compare negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) using our innovative negative pressure device (NPD) and the standard pressure ulcer (PU) wound dressing of in traumatic paraplegia patients. METHOD This study was conducted in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India. Traumatic paraplegia patients with sacral pressure ulcers of stage 3 and 4 were randomised into two groups, receiving either standard wound dressings or NPWT with NPD. The outcomes monitored were length, width (surface area), depth of PU, exudates, discharge, tissue type (necrotic, slough and red granulating tissue), and cost-effectiveness during 0 to 9 weeks follow-up. RESULTS Length and width were significantly (p<0.01) decreased in NPWT group as compared with standard care group at week 9. At weeks 1, 2 and 3, depth was significantly (p<0.05) higher in NPWT group, whereas at week 9 a significant reduction (p=0.01) was observed. Exudates were significantly (p=0.001) lower in NPWT group at weeks 4 and 9. Conversion of slough into red granulation tissue was significantly higher in NPWT group (p=0.001). Discharge became significantly (p=0.001) lower in NPWT at week 2 and no discharge was observed after week 6. In all parameters, decrease was larger in NPWT group compared with standard care, which was significant for exudates type (p=0.03) and tissue type (p=0.004). CONCLUSION Our NPD is better than standard wound care procedures and cost-effective for management of PU.

[1]  J. Posnett,et al.  The cost of pressure ulcers in the United Kingdom. , 2012, Journal of wound care.

[2]  D. Roberson,et al.  Improving wound care simulation with the addition of odor: a descriptive, quasi-experimental study. , 2008, Ostomy/wound management.

[3]  David G Armstrong,et al.  Resource utilization and economic costs of care based on a randomized trial of vacuum-assisted closure therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot wounds. , 2008, American journal of surgery.

[4]  S. Hovius,et al.  Comparing conventional gauze therapy to vacuum-assisted closure wound therapy: a prospective randomised trial. , 2007, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[5]  J. Stechmiller,et al.  Effect of Vacuum‐Assisted Closure Therapy on the expression of cytokines and proteases in wound fluid of adults with pressure ulcers , 2006, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[6]  M. Moses,et al.  Microdeformational Wound Therapy: Effects on Angiogenesis and Matrix Metalloproteinases in Chronic Wounds of 3 Debilitated Patients , 2006, Annals of plastic surgery.

[7]  J. Molnar,et al.  Subatmospheric pressure wound therapy and the vacuum-assisted closure device: basic science and current clinical successes , 2006, Expert review of medical devices.

[8]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Negative pressure wound therapy after partial diabetic foot amputation: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial , 2005, The Lancet.

[9]  C. Ratliff,et al.  Quantifying Bacterial Bioburden During Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: Does the Wound VAC Enhance Bacterial Clearance? , 2004, Annals of plastic surgery.

[10]  G. Pierer,et al.  VACUUM-ASSISTED WOUND CLOSURE FOR CHEAPER AND MORE COMFORTABLE HEALING OF PRESSURE SORES: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY , 2003, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[11]  A. Deva,et al.  Topical negative pressure in wound management , 2000, The Medical journal of Australia.

[12]  T E Philbeck,et al.  The clinical and cost effectiveness of externally applied negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of wounds in home healthcare Medicare patients. , 1999, Ostomy/wound management.

[13]  D. Genecov,et al.  A Controlled Subatmospheric Pressure Dressing Increases the Rate of Skin Graft Donor Site Reepithelialization , 1998, Annals of plastic surgery.

[14]  Louis C. Argenta,et al.  Vacuum‐Assisted Closure: A New Method for Wound Control and Treatment: Clinical Experience , 1997, Annals of plastic surgery.

[15]  L. Argenta,et al.  Vacuum‐Assisted Closure: A New Method for Wound Control and Treatment: Animal Studies and Basic Foundation , 1997, Annals of plastic surgery.

[16]  G. Xakellis,et al.  Cost of Pressure Ulcer Prevention in Long‐Term Care , 1995, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[17]  C. Attinger,et al.  Mechanisms and Clinical Applications of the Vacuum-Assisted Closure (VAC) Device , 2005, American journal of clinical dermatology.

[18]  David R. Thomas Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers : What works ? What doesn ’ t ? , 2001 .