Full-featured, real-time database searching platform enables fast and accurate multiplexed quantitative proteomics

Multiplexed quantitative analyses of complex proteomes enable deep biological insight. While a multitude of workflows have been developed for multiplexed analyses, the most quantitatively accurate method (SPS-MS3) suffers from long acquisition duty cycles. We built a new, real-time database search (RTS) platform, Orbiter, to combat the SPS-MS3 method’s longer duty cycles. RTS with Orbiter enables the elimination of SPS-MS3 scans if no peptide matches to a given spectrum. With Orbiter’s online proteomic analytical pipeline, which includes RTS and false discovery rate analysis, it was possible to process a single spectrum database search in less than 10 milliseconds. The result is a fast, functional means to identify peptide spectral matches using Comet, filter these matches, and more efficiently quantify proteins of interest. Importantly, the use of Comet for peptide spectral matching allowed for a fully featured search, including analysis of post-translational modifications, with well-known and extensively validated scoring. These data could then be used to trigger subsequent scans in an adaptive and flexible manner. In this work we tested the utility of this adaptive data acquisition platform to improve the efficiency and accuracy of multiplexed quantitative experiments. We found that RTS enabled a 2-fold increase in mass spectrometric data acquisition efficiency. Orbiter’s RTS was able to quantify more than 8000 proteins across 10 proteomes in half the time of an SPS-MS3 analysis (18 hours for RTS, 36 hours for SPS-MS3).

[1]  Matthew E Monroe,et al.  Linear discriminant analysis-based estimation of the false discovery rate for phosphopeptide identifications. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[2]  Hee-Jung Jung,et al.  Postexperiment Monoisotopic Mass Filtering and Refinement (PE-MMR) of Tandem Mass Spectrometric Data Increases Accuracy of Peptide Identification in LC/MS/MS*S , 2008, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[3]  Julian Mintseris,et al.  Active Instrument Engagement Combined with a Real-Time Database Search for Improved Performance of Sample Multiplexing Workflows. , 2019, Journal of proteome research.

[4]  Steven P. Gygi,et al.  A Triple Knockout (TKO) Proteomics Standard for Diagnosing Ion Interference in Isobaric Labeling Experiments , 2016, Journal of The American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[5]  Michael J MacCoss,et al.  A Deeper Look into Comet—Implementation and Features , 2015, Journal of The American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[6]  Edward L Huttlin,et al.  Prediction of error associated with false-positive rate determination for peptide identification in large-scale proteomics experiments using a combined reverse and forward peptide sequence database strategy. , 2007, Journal of proteome research.

[7]  Edward L. Huttlin,et al.  A Tissue-Specific Atlas of Mouse Protein Phosphorylation and Expression , 2010, Cell.

[8]  Susan E. Abbatiello,et al.  Characterization and Optimization of Multiplexed Quantitative Analyses Using High-Field Asymmetric-Waveform Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry. , 2019, Analytical chemistry.

[9]  Andrew H. Thompson,et al.  Tandem mass tags: a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[10]  R. Aebersold,et al.  A uniform proteomics MS/MS analysis platform utilizing open XML file formats , 2005, Molecular systems biology.

[11]  Jürgen Cox,et al.  A Framework for Intelligent Data Acquisition and Real-Time Database Searching for Shotgun Proteomics* , 2011, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[12]  P. Thibault,et al.  Improvement of Quantitative Measurements in Multiplex Proteomics Using High-Field Asymmetric Waveform Spectrometry. , 2016, Journal of proteome research.

[13]  Steven P Gygi,et al.  Streamlined Tandem Mass Tag (SL-TMT) Protocol: An Efficient Strategy for Quantitative (Phospho)proteome Profiling Using Tandem Mass Tag-Synchronous Precursor Selection-MS3. , 2018, Journal of proteome research.

[14]  M. Senko,et al.  Determination of monoisotopic masses and ion populations for large biomolecules from resolved isotopic distributions , 1995, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[15]  Edward L. Huttlin,et al.  MultiNotch MS3 Enables Accurate, Sensitive, and Multiplexed Detection of Differential Expression across Cancer Cell Line Proteomes , 2014, Analytical chemistry.

[16]  Jianqi Li,et al.  A new strategy to filter out false positive identifications of peptides in SEQUEST database search results , 2007, Proteomics.

[17]  S. Gygi,et al.  ms3 eliminates ratio distortion in isobaric multiplexed quantitative , 2011 .

[18]  Jesper V Olsen,et al.  Benchmarking common quantification strategies for large-scale phosphoproteomics , 2018, Nature Communications.

[19]  Steven P. Gygi,et al.  Proteome-Wide Evaluation of Two Common Protein Quantification Methods. , 2018, Journal of proteome research.

[20]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  Multiplexed Post-Experimental Monoisotopic Mass Refinement (mPE-MMR) to Increase Sensitivity and Accuracy in Peptide Identifications from Tandem Mass Spectra of Cofragmentation. , 2017, Analytical chemistry.

[21]  Derek J. Bailey,et al.  Intelligent Data Acquisition Blends Targeted and Discovery Methods , 2014, Journal of proteome research.

[22]  J. Eng,et al.  Comet: An open‐source MS/MS sequence database search tool , 2013, Proteomics.

[23]  J. Yates,et al.  An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database , 1994, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry.