Majoring in Technology Studies at High School and Fostering Learning

A framework for helping low-achieving pupils through reinforcement in technology at high school is presented. Social-cognitive theory, concepts of authentic learning, learning by doing and peer learning all underpin the efforts to remove pupils from the vicious circle of low expectations and failures. The primary goal of modern technology studies is to impart pupils with high cognitive and personal competencies, as an alternative to teaching motor-based skills or memorising-based knowledge. This study's subjects were two groups of pupils who learned technology in an Israeli comprehensive high school. In tenth grade, the pupils became acquainted with the LEGO-Logo learning environment, acquired thinking tools from de Bono's CoRT program and worked in groups or individually on original projects. At the same time, they learned theoretical topics such as the physics of static mechanical systems and computerised technical drawing. In the eleventh and twelfth grades, the pupils took advanced courses in mechanical engineering, such as design of machine parts, automation and control systems. Observations in classes, interviews with the pupils and their parents, and findings from pupil questionnaires indicated an improvement in the pupils' self-efficacy and increased motivation to study at the present and in the future. The main features of the program, in the pupils' eyes, were construction activities, team projects and free study. The major ‘outputs’, in the pupils' eyes, were independence, initiative and interest in their studies.

[1]  J. Dewey Experience and Education , 1938 .

[2]  Moshe Barak,et al.  Integrating the Cognitive Research Trust (CoRT) Programme for Creative Thinking into a Project‐based Technology Curriculum , 1999 .

[3]  Moshe Barak,et al.  Aspects of Teamwork Observed in a Technological Task in Junior High Schools. , 1998 .

[4]  F. Barron Creative person and creative process , 1969 .

[5]  J. Lave Cognition in practice , 1988 .

[6]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  A Middle Grade Science Teacher's Emerging Understanding of Project-Based Instruction , 1994, The Elementary School Journal.

[7]  S. Waks Curriculum Design: from an art towards a science , 1997 .

[8]  Gavriel Salomon,et al.  Novel constructivist learning environments and novel technologies: some issues to be concerned with , 1998 .

[9]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[11]  J. N. Collings Scientific Thinking through the Development of Formal Operations: Training in the Cognitive Restructuring Aspect of Field-Independence. , 1985 .

[12]  Moshe Barak Enhanced Science and Technology Teaching-Learning Processes and Novel Technologies: From Theory to Practice , 1999 .

[13]  C. Martindale Personality, situation, and creativity. , 1989 .

[14]  Gavriel Salomon,et al.  New Challenges for Educational Research: studying the individual within learning environments , 1992 .

[15]  E. Paul Torrance,et al.  Guiding creative talent , 1962 .

[16]  B. Fraser Science Learning Environments: Assessment, Effects and Determinants , 1998 .

[17]  D. Schunk,et al.  Risk Taking: Theoretical, Empirical, and Educational Considerations , 1991 .

[18]  Ann Marie Hill,et al.  Problem Solving in Real-Life Contexts: An Alternative for Design in Technology Education , 1998 .

[19]  Moshe Barak,et al.  Hot-air balloons: Project-centered study as a bridge between science and technology education , 2000 .

[20]  Moshe Barak,et al.  Advancement of Low Achievers within Technology Studies at High School , 1994 .

[21]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[22]  A. Isen,et al.  Positive affect, cognitive processes, and social behavior. , 1987 .

[23]  Shlomo Waks Lateral Thinking and Technology Education , 1997 .

[24]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[25]  Frank M. Pajares,et al.  Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Academic Settings , 1996 .

[26]  Robert H. Ennis The Extent to Which Critical Thinking Is Subject-Specific: Further Clarification , 1990 .

[27]  Raymond L. Debus,et al.  Subject-specific components of academic self-concept and self-efficacy , 1991 .

[28]  S Waks Science-technology dimensions in physics education: prospects and impact , 1994 .