An evaluation of two swarm intelligence MANET routing algorithms in an urban environment

We study through simulation the performance of two swarm intelligence MANET routing algorithms in a realistic urban environment. The two algorithms, ANSI and AntHocNet, implement the swarm intelligence paradigm for routing in different ways: while ANSI applies a reactive approach in which ants are only sent out when no route is available between the source and destination of a communication session, AntHocNet integrates reactive and proactive mechanisms whereby the algorithm sends out ants at regular intervals during the entire duration of running sessions in order to continuously adapt and improve existing routes. The two swarm intelligence routing algorithms are compared to AODV, a state-of-the-art reactive algorithm, and OLSR, a state-of-the-art proactive algorithm. Our objective is to investigate the usefulness of the different approaches adopted by the algorithms when confronted with the peculiarities of urban environments and the requirements of real-world applications. At this aim we define a detailed and realistic simulation setup. We model node mobility by limiting node movements to the streets and open spaces of town, use a ray-tracing approach to model the propagation of radio waves, and investigate different kinds of interactive data traffic patterns, ranging from SMS messaging to VoIP communications.

[1]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks , 2001, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[2]  Luca Maria Gambardella,et al.  Using Ant Agents to Combine Reactive and Proactive Strategies for Routing in Mobile Ad-hoc Networks , 2005, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Appl..

[3]  Elizabeth M. Belding-Royer,et al.  A review of current routing protocols for ad hoc mobile wireless networks , 1999, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[4]  Luca Maria Gambardella,et al.  Ant Algorithms for Discrete Optimization , 1999, Artificial Life.

[5]  David A. Maltz,et al.  Dynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks , 1994, Mobidata.

[6]  Eryk Dutkiewicz,et al.  A review of routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks , 2004, Ad Hoc Networks.

[7]  Wenyu Jiang,et al.  Analysis of on-off patterns in VoIP and their effect on voice traffic aggregation , 2000, Proceedings Ninth International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (Cat.No.00EX440).

[8]  David A. Maltz,et al.  A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols , 1998, MobiCom '98.

[9]  Muddassar Farooq,et al.  Routing Protocols for Next-Generation Networks Inspired by Collective Behaviors of Insect Societies: An Overview , 2008, Swarm Intelligence.

[10]  Jon Crowcroft,et al.  Towards commercial mobile ad hoc network applications: a radio dispatch system , 2005, MobiHoc '05.

[11]  Luca Maria Gambardella,et al.  A Simulation Study of Routing Performance in Realistic Urban Scenarios for MANETs , 2008, ANTS Conference.

[12]  Martin Wenig,et al.  The effect of the radio wave propagation model in mobile ad hoc networks , 2006, MSWiM '06.

[13]  Luca Maria Gambardella,et al.  AntHocNet: an adaptive nature-inspired algorithm for routing in mobile ad hoc networks , 2005, Eur. Trans. Telecommun..

[14]  Mario Gerla,et al.  TCP performance in wireless multi-hop networks , 1999, Proceedings WMCSA'99. Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications.

[15]  Tomasz Imielinski,et al.  Mobile Computing , 1996 .

[16]  Chien-Chung Shen,et al.  ANSI: A swarm intelligence-based unicast routing protocol for hybrid ad hoc networks , 2006, J. Syst. Archit..

[17]  Stephan Bohacek,et al.  Performance of urban mesh networks , 2005, MSWiM '05.

[18]  Marco Dorigo,et al.  AntNet: Distributed Stigmergetic Control for Communications Networks , 1998, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[19]  Kevin C. Almeroth,et al.  Towards realistic mobility models for mobile ad hoc networks , 2003, MobiCom '03.

[20]  Stephan Bohacek,et al.  Realistic propagation simulation of urban mesh networks , 2007, Comput. Networks.

[21]  Mingyan Liu,et al.  Random waypoint considered harmful , 2003, IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428).

[22]  Hannu H. Kari,et al.  Ad Hoc Routing Protocol Performance in a Realistic Environment , 2006, International Conference on Networking, International Conference on Systems and International Conference on Mobile Communications and Learning Technologies (ICNICONSMCL'06).

[23]  Per Gunningberg,et al.  Lessons from experimental MANET research , 2005, Ad Hoc Networks.

[24]  Marco Dorigo,et al.  Ant colony optimization and its application to adaptive routing in telecommunication networks , 2004 .

[25]  David M. Nicol,et al.  Empirical Validation of Wireless Models in Simulations of Ad Hoc Routing Protocols , 2005, Simul..

[26]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing , 1999, Proceedings WMCSA'99. Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications.

[27]  Abbas Jamalipour,et al.  Wireless communications , 2005, GLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005..

[28]  Gregory A. Hansen,et al.  The Optimized Link State Routing Protocol , 2003 .

[29]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks , 2001, IEEE Wirel. Commun..