Modeling of contrast agent kinetics in the lung using T1‐weighted dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI

Assessment of perfusion and capillary permeability is important in both malignant and nonmalignant lung disease. Kinetic modeling of T1‐weighted dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI (DCE‐MRI) data may provide such an assessment. This study establishes the feasibility and interrelationship of kinetic modeling approaches designed to estimate microvascular properties in malignant and nonmalignant tissues of the lung. DCE‐MRI data were acquired using a low molecular weight contrast agent with 4‐sec temporal resolution in lung cancer patients. A model‐free parameterization and three kinetic models of increasing complexity, each related to the classical Kety model, were applied. Comparison of an extended Kety model and the adiabatic approximation to the tissue homogeneity (AATH) model using Akaike's Information Criterion suggested that in most cases the best description of the lung tumor data is obtained using the AATH model. In the normal lung parenchyma the temporal resolution was insufficient to separate effects of flow and contrast agent leakage and in this case the extended Kety model yielded the best fit to the data. Magn Reson Med, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  A. Jackson,et al.  Experimentally‐derived functional form for a population‐averaged high‐temporal‐resolution arterial input function for dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Sophie Laurent,et al.  Comparative study of the physicochemical properties of six clinical low molecular weight gadolinium contrast agents. , 2006, Contrast media & molecular imaging.

[3]  Geoffrey J. M. Parker,et al.  Tracer Kinetic Modelling for T1-Weighted DCE-MRI , 2005 .

[4]  G. Parker,et al.  Prostate cancer: evaluation of vascular characteristics with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging--initial experience. , 2004, Radiology.

[5]  Y. Ohno,et al.  Dynamic perfusion MRI versus perfusion scintigraphy: prediction of postoperative lung function in patients with lung cancer. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  Alan Jackson,et al.  Automated Arterial Input Function Extraction for T1-Weighted DCE-MRI , 2003 .

[7]  David L Buckley,et al.  Uncertainty in the analysis of tracer kinetics using dynamic contrast‐enhanced T1‐weighted MRI , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  M V Knopp,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oncology. , 2001, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[9]  R R Edelman,et al.  Evaluation of regional pulmonary perfusion using ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  D. Drost,et al.  Simultaneous MRI measurement of blood flow, blood volume, and capillary permeability in mammary tumors using two different contrast agents , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  A. Jackson,et al.  Improved 3D quantitative mapping of blood volume and endothelial permeability in brain tumors , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  R R Edelman,et al.  Quantitative assessment of pulmonary perfusion with dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  M. Knopp,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced t1‐weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  J L Evelhoch,et al.  Key factors in the acquisition of contrast kinetic data for oncology , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  Ting-Yim Lee,et al.  An Adiabatic Approximation to the Tissue Homogeneity Model for Water Exchange in the Brain: I. Theoretical Derivation , 1998, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[16]  A. Fischman,et al.  Dynamic T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography in patients with lung cancer: correlating vascular physiology with glucose metabolism. , 1998, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[17]  Parker Gjm Monitoring contrast agent kinetics using dynamic MRI : quantitative and qualitative analysis. , 1997 .

[18]  T. Roberts,et al.  Physiologic measurements by contrast‐enhanced MR imaging: Expectations and limitations , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  P. Tofts Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd‐DTPA MR imaging , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  P. Tofts,et al.  Measurement of the blood‐brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  A. Haase,et al.  Snapshot flash mri. applications to t1, t2, and chemical‐shift imaging , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  H. Weinmann,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of GdDTPA/dimeglumine after intravenous injection into healthy volunteers. , 1984, Physiological chemistry and physics and medical NMR.

[23]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[24]  T. Wilson,et al.  A model for capillary exchange. , 1966, The American journal of physiology.

[25]  S. Kety The theory and applications of the exchange of inert gas at the lungs and tissues. , 1951, Pharmacological reviews.

[26]  An Adiabatic Approximation to the Tissue Homogeneity Model for Water Exchange in the Brain : I . Theoretical Derivation , .