Modelling plant canopy effects on variability of soil temperature and water: model calibration and validation

Abstract Temperature conditions and the availability of moisture in the near-surface soil environment drives many important plant and other biological processes. Vegetation, which can be controlled by management, affects the spatial and temporal variability of heat and water in the soil. Land managers need to address the interactions between physical, chemical and biological factors in the near surface, but lack the necessary information. The ability to predict temperature and water within the soil–plant–atmosphere system enhances our ability to evaluate management options and enables better understanding of interactions between surface processes and the atmosphere. The Simultaneous Heat and Water (SHAW) Model, a detailed model of heat and water movement in a plant–snow–residue–soil system, was applied to 2 full years of data on semi-arid sagebrush rangeland to simulate vegetation effects on the spatial and temporal variation of soil temperature and water. Minor calibration was necessary to match the drop in measured soil water potential as the soil dried in the late spring and early summer. The model accounted for over 93% of the variation in average daily soil temperature for a sagebrush-covered area and over 96% of the variation in temperature for a bare soil surface for 2 years. Rapid changes in surface water potential and drying of the soil profile as simulated by the model closely tracked measured observations.

[1]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[2]  Gerald N. Flerchinger,et al.  Modeling plant canopy effects on variability of soil temperature and water , 1991 .

[3]  T. Carlson,et al.  Estimating near-surface soil moisture availability using a meteorologically driven soil-water profile model , 1994 .

[4]  P. Kitanidis,et al.  Real‐time forecasting with a conceptual hydrologic model: 2. Applications and results , 1980 .

[5]  L. Stroosnijder,et al.  Test and analysis of a model of water use by sorghum , 1984 .

[6]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Simulator for Water Resources in Rural Basins , 1985 .

[7]  M. Haferkamp,et al.  Water Relations of Artemisia tridentata ssp. wyomingensis and Sarcobatus vermiculatus in the Steppe of Southeastern Oregon , 1989 .

[8]  F. Pierson,et al.  Variability of near-surface soil temperature on sagebrush rangeland. , 1991 .

[9]  Claudio O. Stöckle,et al.  Simulation of Crop Response to Water and Nitrogen: An Example Using Spring Wheat , 1989 .

[10]  M. E. Thiede,et al.  Effects of coppice dune topography and vegetation on soil water dynamics in a cold-desert ecosystem , 1994 .

[11]  Richard Miller Comparison of water use by Artemisia tridentata spp. wyomingensis and Chrysothamnus viscidiflorus spp. viscidiflorus. , 1988 .

[12]  Gaylon S. Campbell,et al.  Soil physics with BASIC :transport models for soil-plant systems , 1985 .

[13]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  Real‐time forecasting with a conceptual hydrologic model: 1. Analysis of uncertainty , 1980 .

[14]  Dan R. Upchurch,et al.  Energy and water balance of a sparse crop: simulated and measured soil and crop evaporation , 1987 .

[15]  J. Harte,et al.  Energy and water. , 1978, Science.