Examining factors for the adoption of silvopastoral agroforestry in the Colombian Amazon

[1]  N. Clerici,et al.  A new war on nature and people: taking stock of the Colombian peace agreement , 2022, Global Sustainability.

[2]  S. Sieber,et al.  Understanding systemic land use dynamics in conflict-affected territories: The cases of Cesar and Caquetá, Colombia , 2022, PloS one.

[3]  M. G. Ceddia,et al.  Adoption of sustainable silvopastoral practices in Argentina's Gran Chaco: A multilevel approach , 2022, Journal of Arid Environments.

[4]  Yelly Yamparli Pardo Rozo,et al.  Key Factors of Competitiveness and Sustainability in Livestock Systems of The Andean-Amazonian Piedmont , 2022, Mercados Y Negocios.

[5]  M. Louhaichi,et al.  Tapping Into the Environmental Co-benefits of Improved Tropical Forages for an Agroecological Transformation of Livestock Production Systems , 2021, Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems.

[6]  A. P. Barnes,et al.  Farmer intentional pathways for net zero carbon: Exploring the lock-in effects of forestry and renewables , 2021, Land Use Policy.

[7]  O. Ndiaye,et al.  Farmers’ perception on the benefits and constraints of Farmer Managed Natural Regeneration and determinants of its adoption in the southern groundnut basin of Senegal , 2021, Agroforestry Systems.

[8]  T. Kroeger,et al.  Agroforestry and non-state actors: A review , 2021 .

[9]  D. Chadwick,et al.  Marginal Abatement Cost Curves for Latin American dairy production: A Costa Rica case study , 2021 .

[10]  P. Lavelle,et al.  Agroforestry systems in the Colombian Amazon improve the provision of soil ecosystem services , 2021 .

[11]  A. Loboguerrero,et al.  The risk of unintended deforestation from scaling sustainable livestock production systems , 2021, Conservation Science and Practice.

[12]  B. Soares-Filho,et al.  Deforestation reduces rainfall and agricultural revenues in the Brazilian Amazon , 2021, Nature Communications.

[13]  E. Gosling,et al.  Which Socio-economic Conditions Drive the Selection of Agroforestry at the Forest Frontier? , 2021, Environmental Management.

[14]  M. Kröger,et al.  Agroforestry transitions: The good, the bad and the ugly , 2021 .

[15]  J. E. Velásquez,et al.  Tipificación de sistemas agropecuarios en el piedemonte amazónico colombiano , 2020, Espacios.

[16]  M. Cherubin,et al.  Restoring soil carbon and chemical properties through silvopastoral adoption in the Colombian Amazon region , 2020, Land Degradation & Development.

[17]  Marcelo José Carrer,et al.  Determinants of adoption of integrated systems by cattle farmers in the State of Sao Paulo, Brazil , 2020, Agroforestry Systems.

[18]  T. Rosenstock,et al.  Carbon Storage Potential of Silvopastoral Systems of Colombia , 2020 .

[19]  A. Engler,et al.  Factors Affecting the Adoption of Agroforestry Practices: Insights from Silvopastoral Systems of Colombia , 2020, Forests.

[20]  Juan F. Vargas,et al.  End-of-conflict deforestation: Evidence from Colombia’s peace agreement , 2020, World Development.

[21]  Paulo J. Murillo-Sandoval,et al.  The end of gunpoint conservation: forest disturbance after the Colombian peace agreement , 2020, Environmental Research Letters.

[22]  S. Sieber,et al.  Adoption potentials and barriers of silvopastoral system in Colombia: Case of Cundinamarca region , 2020 .

[23]  Kelly W. Jones,et al.  Identifying the determinants of and barriers to landowner participation in reforestation in Costa Rica , 2019, Land Use Policy.

[24]  R. Rhoda.  Costa Rica Case Study , 2019, Urban and Regional Analysis for Development Planning.

[25]  T. Krueger,et al.  A local perspective on drivers and measures to slow deforestation in the Andean-Amazonian foothills of Colombia , 2018, Land Use Policy.

[26]  H. Woodrow,et al.  : A Review of the , 2018 .

[27]  C. Ortiz.  Colombia , 2018 .

[28]  Dolors Armenteras,et al.  Deforestation dynamics and drivers in different forest types in Latin America: Three decades of studies (1980–2010) , 2017 .

[29]  M. Smale,et al.  How Does Gender Affect Sustainable Intensification of Cereal Production in the West African Sahel? Evidence from Burkina Faso , 2017, World development.

[30]  T. Gardner,et al.  Improving land management in Brazil: A perspective from producers , 2017 .

[31]  Charles R. Warren,et al.  Limited adoption of short rotation coppice: The role of farmers' socio-cultural identity in influencing practice , 2016 .

[32]  Jennifer Twyman,et al.  Silvopastoral systems in Latin America: mitigation opportunities for men and women livestock producers , 2015 .

[33]  M. Cochrane,et al.  Roads, deforestation, and the mitigating effect of protected areas in the Amazon , 2014 .

[34]  Alicia Calle,et al.  A Strategy for Scaling-Up Intensive Silvopastoral Systems in Colombia , 2013 .

[35]  M. McHugh,et al.  The Chi-square test of independence , 2013, Biochemia medica.

[36]  Nikolaos Scarmeas,et al.  The good, bad, and ugly? , 2012, Neurology.

[37]  Stefano Pagiola,et al.  Poor Household Participation in Payments for Environmental Services: Lessons from the Silvopastoral Project in Quindío, Colombia , 2010 .

[38]  A. Angelsen,et al.  Will Livestock Intensification Help Save Latin America's Tropical Forests? , 2008 .

[39]  S. Sloan.  Reforestation amidst deforestation: Simultaneity and succession , 2008 .

[40]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  Taking stock of agroforestry adoption studies , 2003, Agroforestry Systems.

[41]  Escuela Superior de Guerra “General Rafael Reyes P.  Gobierno , 1973, Revista de las Fuerzas Armadas.

[42]  M. Cherubin,et al.  Evaluating soil quality in silvopastoral systems by the Soil Management Assessment Framework (SMAF) in Colombian Amazon , 2022, REVISTA CIÊNCIA AGRONÔMICA.

[43]  Florescu Adriana,et al.  Adoption of sustainable cattle production technologies in the Lacandon rainforest, Chiapas, México , 2018 .

[44]  Cristian Berrío-Zapata,et al.  Country overview Colombia , 2017 .

[45]  Miguel García-Sánchez.  A multilevel approach , 2016 .

[46]  T. Berger,et al.  Adoption and development of integrated crop–livestock–forestry systems in Mato Grosso, Brazil , 2015 .

[47]  J. Salazar,et al.  CARACTERIZACIÓN DE LOS SISTEMAS PRODUCTIVOS Y PERCEPCIÓN DE LOS AGRICULTORES SOBRE AGROFORESTERÍA: CASO CONFORMACIÓN RED SILVOPASTORIL , 2013 .

[48]  D. Reider,et al.  Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System , 2012 .

[49]  B. Vinceti,et al.  Climate change and tree genetic resource management: maintaining and enhancing the productivity and value of smallholder tropical agroforestry landscapes. A review , 2010, Agroforestry Systems.

[50]  M. Ibrahim,et al.  Sistemas silvopastoriles como una herramienta para el mejoramiento de la productividad y restauración de la integridad ecológica de paisajes ganaderos , 2006 .

[51]  A. Angelsen,et al.  Is agroforestry likely to reduce deforestation , 2004 .

[52]  K. Schmidt.  A Conceptual Framework , 2002 .

[53]  Glenda Bonilla,et al.  Uso de frutos y follaje arbóreo en la alimentación de vacunos en la época seca en Boaco, Nicaragua , 2001 .