Tacit Knowledge in Academia: A Proposed Model and Measurement Scale

The authors propose a multidimensional model of tacit knowledge and develop a measure of tacit knowledge in academia. They discuss the theory and extant literature on tacit knowledge and propose a 6-factor model. Experiment 1 is a replication of a recent study of academic tacit knowledge using the scale developed and administered at an Israeli university (A. Somech & R. Bogler, 1999). The results of the replication differed from those found in the original study. For Experiment 2, the authors developed a domain-specific measure of academic tacit knowledge, the Academic Tacit Knowledge Scale (ATKS), and used this measure to explore the multidimensionality of tacit knowledge proposed in the model. The results of an exploratory factor analysis (n = 142) followed by a confirmatory factor analysis (n = 286) are reported. The sample for both experiments was 428 undergraduate students enrolled at a large public university in the eastern United States. Results indicated that a 5-factor model of academic tacit knowledge provided a strong fit for the data.

[1]  V. Ambrosini,et al.  Tacit Knowledge: Some Suggestions for Operationalization , 2001 .

[2]  K. Sweeney.  Personal knowledge , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  Richard M. Steers,et al.  Motivation and Work Behaviour , 1978 .

[4]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Concept of “Ba”: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation , 1998 .

[5]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Practical intelligence : nature and origins of competence in the everyday world , 1986 .

[6]  Joseph A. Horvath,et al.  Tacit knowledge in professional practice : researcher and practitioner perspectives , 2000 .

[7]  Moritz Schlick,et al.  Knowing and Being , 1974 .

[8]  Joseph L. Badaracco,et al.  The knowledge link , 1990 .

[9]  K. R. Conner,et al.  A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism , 1996 .

[10]  M. C. Hill,et al.  Evaluating Model Fit , 2005 .

[11]  Anit Somech,et al.  Tacit Knowledge in Academia: Its Effects on Student Learning and Achievement , 1999 .

[12]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[13]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[14]  Elena L. Grigorenko,et al.  Practical Intelligence in Everyday Life , 2000 .

[15]  Shawn L. Berman,et al.  Tacit Knowledge as a Source of Competitive Advantage in the National Basketball Association , 2002 .

[16]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[17]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[19]  Richard K. Wagner,et al.  Tacit knowledge in everyday intelligent behavior. , 1987 .

[20]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Practical Intelligence: The Nature and Role of Tacit Knowledge in Work and at School , 2018, Mechanisms of Everyday Cognition.

[21]  Fiona Godlee,et al.  Testing common sense , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  Michael A. McDaniel,et al.  Use of situational judgment tests to predict job performance: a clarification of the literature. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.