Abstract Increased awareness on environmental issues, together with requirements imposed by implementation of energy efficiency codes, has generated the need for tools that evaluate thermal performance of buildings. Their objective is to ensure compliance and certification. However, existing computer models are still rudimentary with many limitations for use in early design stages of any architectural project. They require exact data in a stage when designers consider conceptual ideas from a range of options rather than precise details and numbers. Design tools that suggest solutions based on ideas are rare. This disadvantage can be seen in the planning of intelligent facades, where the number of possible configurations can be overwhelming and decisions made in early stages have profound effects on energy and comfort performance. This paper presents NewFacades, a model that helps pass from ideas to significant concepts in the design of intelligent facades. It uses energy and visual comfort strategies abstracted from a prescriptive energy code for hot climates to suggest a range of good starting solutions. Designers can have energy and visual comfort estimations to these alternatives through an advanced stage energy simulation program such as EnergyPlus, or explore them further with other tools. Methods used by the tool are presented here in the context of sample cases. By working on energy principles or relying on local existing energy standards, the model can be extended to all types of climates.
[1]
D. van Dijk,et al.
The European directive on energy performance of buildings (EPBD)- The EPBD Building Platform
,
2008
.
[2]
Edna Shaviv,et al.
Energy code for office buildings in Israel
,
2008
.
[3]
I. G. Capeluto,et al.
Evaluating visual comfort and performance of three natural lighting systems for deep office buildings in highly luminous climates
,
2006
.
[4]
Matthias Haase,et al.
Sustainable Façade Design for Zero Energy Buildings in the Tropics
,
2006
.
[5]
Quentin Stevens,et al.
Design codes: their use and potential
,
2006
.
[6]
Kimberle Koile,et al.
Formalizing abstract characteristics of style
,
2006,
Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.
[7]
I. G. Capeluto,et al.
Strategic decision-making for intelligent buildings: Comparative impact of passive design strategies and active features in a hot climate
,
2008
.
[8]
Kwok-Wing Chau,et al.
An expert system on design of liquid‐retaining structures with blackboard architecture
,
2004,
Expert Syst. J. Knowl. Eng..
[9]
Matthias Rauterberg,et al.
A computer support tool for the early stages of architectural design
,
2006,
Interact. Comput..
[10]
Baruch Givoni,et al.
Climate considerations in building and urban design
,
1998
.