Improved accuracy of component alignment with the implementation of image-free navigation in total knee arthroplasty

Accuracy of implant positioning and reconstruction of the mechanical leg axis are major requirements for achieving good long-term results in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of the present study was to determine whether image-free computer navigation technology has the potential to improve the accuracy of component alignment in TKA cohorts of experienced surgeons immediately and constantly. One hundred patients with primary arthritis of the knee underwent the unilateral total knee arthroplasty. The cohort of 50 TKAs implanted with conventional instrumentation was directly followed by the cohort of the very first 50 computer-assisted TKAs. All surgeries were performed by two senior surgeons. All patients received the Zimmer NexGen™ total knee prosthesis (Zimmer Inc., Warsaw, IN, USA). There was no variability regarding surgeons or surgical technique, except for the use of the navigation system (StealthStation® Treon plus®, Medtronic Inc., Minnesota, MI, USA). Accuracy of implant positioning was measured on postoperative long-leg standing radiographs and standard lateral X-rays with regard to the valgus angle and the coronal and sagittal component angles. In addition, preoperative deformities of the mechanical leg axis, tourniquet time, age, and gender were correlated. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) software package. Independent t-tests were used, with significance set at P < 0.05 (two-tailed) to compare differences in mean angular values and frontal mechanical alignment between the two cohorts. To compute the rate of optimally implanted prostheses between the two groups we used the χ2 test. The average postoperative radiological frontal mechanical alignment was 1.88° of varus (range 6.1° of valgus–10.1° of varus; SD 3.68°) in the conventional cohort and 0.28° of varus (range 3.7°–6.0° of varus; SD 1.97°) in the navigated cohort. Including all criteria for optimal implant alignment, 16 cases (32%) in the conventional cohort and 31 cases (62%) in the navigated cohort have been implanted optimally. The average difference in tourniquet time was modest with additional 12.9 min in the navigated cohort compared to the conventional cohort. Our findings suggest that the experienced knee surgeons can improve immediately and constantly the accuracy of component orientation using an image-free computer-assisted navigation system in TKA. The computer-assisted technology has shown to be easy to use, safe, and efficient in routine knee replacement surgery. We believe that navigation is a key technology for various current and future surgical alignment topics and minimal-invasive lower limb surgery.

[1]  J. Insall,et al.  The total condylar prosthesis. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  J. Moreland Mechanisms of failure in total knee arthroplasty. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  T D Cooke,et al.  A standardized technique for lower limb radiography. Practice, applications, and error analysis. , 1991, Investigative radiology.

[4]  S. Harwin,et al.  Influence of intramedullary versus extramedullary alignment guides on final total knee arthroplasty component position: a radiographic analysis. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  D. Dennis,et al.  Intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment systems in total knee arthroplasty. , 1993, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  Steffen Kohler,et al.  Consistency of implantation of a total knee arthroplasty with a non-image-based navigation system: a case-control study of 235 cases compared with 235 conventionally implanted prostheses. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[7]  J. Gollish,et al.  The accuracy of femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty. , 1997, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  R. Morris,et al.  Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[9]  P. Aichroth,et al.  Radiological study of alignment after total knee replacement , 1991, International Orthopaedics.

[10]  B B Seedhom,et al.  Computer-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Patient-specific Templating , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  Markus Tingart,et al.  Revision total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of postoperative leg alignment after computer-assisted implantation versus the conventional technique , 2005, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[12]  D. S. Pandher,et al.  Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  J. Rand,et al.  Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  W Waugh,et al.  Tibiofemoral alignment and the results of knee replacement. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[15]  Y Kalairajah,et al.  Are systemic emboli reduced in computer-assisted knee surgery?: A prospective, randomised, clinical trial. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[16]  E. Schkommodau,et al.  CT-Based Planning and Individual Template Navigation in TKA , 2004 .

[17]  A R Feinstein,et al.  Measurement of lower limb alignment using long radiographs. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[18]  T. Wright Biomechanics. Clinical Aspects of Biomedicine. 2. , 1993 .

[19]  R. Gustilo,et al.  Extramedullary versus intramedullary alignment guides in total knee arthroplasty. , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  J. Grifka,et al.  CT-basierte und CT-freie Navigation in der Knieendoprothetik , 2003, Der Unfallchirurg.

[21]  Peter Loan,et al.  Computer-Assisted Navigation in Total Knee Replacement: Results of an Initial Experience in Thirty-five Patients , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  A. Lindstrand,et al.  Porous Coated Anatomic Tricompartmental Tibial Components: The Relationship Between Prosthetic Position and Micromotion , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  D. Berry Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty is better than a conventional jig-based technique in terms of component alignment. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  C. Ranawat,et al.  Survivorship analysis and results of total condylar knee arthroplasty. Eight- to 11-year follow-up period. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[25]  D. Banzer,et al.  Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[26]  P. Lotke,et al.  Long-term results after total condylar knee arthroplasty. Significance of radiolucent lines. , 1987, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[27]  C. Ranawat,et al.  Total Condylar Knee Replacement: A 20-Year Followup Study , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[28]  George A. Brown,et al.  Rapid Prototyping: The Future of Trauma Surgery? , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[29]  M. Bolognesi,et al.  Computer Navigation versus Standard Instrumentation for TKA: A Single-Surgeon Experience , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[30]  M. Ritter,et al.  Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[31]  Wolfhart Puhl,et al.  Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[32]  C. Bach,et al.  Radiographic Assessment in Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[33]  M. Pagnano,et al.  Preoperative Hip to Ankle Radiographs in Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[34]  P. Nicolai,et al.  The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 Press Fit Condylar posterior cruciate-sacrificing total knee arthroplasties. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[35]  J. Caillouette,et al.  Fat Embolism Syndrome Following the Intramedullary Alignment Guide in Total Knee Arthroplasty , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[36]  W. Breidahl,et al.  Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[37]  D. Hungerford,et al.  Intramedullary goniometer can improve alignment in knee arthroplasty surgery. , 1997, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[38]  K. Swanson,et al.  Does Axial Limb Rotation Affect the Alignment Measurements in Deformed Limbs? , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[39]  R. Laskin The Genesis Total Knee Prosthesis: A 10-Year Followup Study , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[40]  R. Wixson,et al.  Safety of 1-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[41]  C. Colwell,et al.  Accuracy of Intramedullary Versus Extramedullary Tibial Alignment Cutting Systems in Total Knee Arthroplasty , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[42]  G. Engh,et al.  Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. , 1988, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[43]  S. Delp,et al.  Computer assisted knee replacement. , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[44]  [CT-based and CT-free navigation in knee prosthesis implantation. Results of a prospective study]. , 2003, Der Unfallchirurg.

[45]  J. Insall,et al.  The total condylar prosthesis. 10- to 12-year results of a cemented knee replacement. , 1989, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.