Initial Usability Testing of Navigation and Interaction Methods in Virtual Environments: Developing Usable Interfaces for Brain Injury Rehabilitation

It is speculated that virtual environments (VE) might be used as a training tool in brain injury rehabilitation. The rehabilitation process often involves practicing so-called instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), such as shopping, cooking, and using a telephone. If a brain injury patient is to practice such activities in a VE, the patient must be able to navigate the viewpoint and interact with virtual objects in an understandable way. People with brain injury may be less tolerant to a poor interface and a VE might therefore become unusable due to, for example, an unsuitable input device. In this paper we present two studies aimed to do initial usability testing of VE interaction methods on people without experience of 3D computer graphics. In the first study four navigation input device configurations were compared: the IntelliKeys keyboard and the Microsoft Sidewinder joystick, both programmed with two and three degrees of freedom (DOF). The purpose of the second study was to evaluate a method for interaction with objects, and to find a sufficiently usable input device for this purpose. The keyboard was found to be more suitable for navigation tasks in which the user wants to give the viewpoint a more advantageous position and orientation for carrying out a specific task. No big differences could be found between two and three DOFs. The method for interaction with objects was found to work sufficiently well. No difference in performance could be found between mouse and touch screen, but some evidence was found that they affect the usability of the VE interface in different ways.

[1]  I. Whishaw,et al.  Fundamentals of Human Neuropsychology , 1995 .

[2]  John R. Wilson,et al.  Virtual Reality-Induced Symptoms and Effects (VRISE) , 1999, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[3]  Jean-François Lapointe.  Effects of joystick mapping and field-of-view on human performance in virtual walkthroughs , 2002, Proceedings. First International Symposium on 3D Data Processing Visualization and Transmission.

[4]  Corinna E. Lathan,et al.  Using the VREye System for the Assessment of Unilateral Visual Neglect: Two Case Reports , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[5]  Janice K. Battenberg,et al.  Touch Screen versus Keyboard: A Comparison of Task Performance of Young Children , 1989 .

[6]  J. Gladman,et al.  Virtual reality and stroke rehabilitation: a tangible interface to an every day task , 2002 .

[7]  Gerd Johansson,et al.  A Virtual Cash Dispenser for Persons with Acquired Brain Injury , 2001 .

[8]  B. Norrving,et al.  Increased stroke incidence in Lund-Orup, Sweden, between 1983 to 1985 and 1993 to 1995. , 2000, Stroke.

[9]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  Testbed Evaluation of Virtual Environment Interaction Techniques , 2001, Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ..

[10]  Thomas A. Martin,et al.  An evaluation of touch-screen input for a HyperCard-based digit-span task , 1991 .

[11]  E. A. Attree,et al.  Probing Memory and Executive Functions with Virtual Reality: Past and Present Studies , 1998, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[12]  James S. Elkind.  Use of Virtual Reality to Diagnose and Habilitate People with Neurological Dysfunctions , 1998, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[13]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[14]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  In Search of the 'Magic Carpet': Design and Experimentation of a Bimanual 3D Navigation Interface , 1999, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..

[15]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the user interface - strategies for effective human-computer interaction, 3rd Edition , 1997 .

[16]  Brian Hobbs,et al.  Developing a Virtual Reality-Based Methodology for People with Dementia: A Feasibility Study , 2003, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[17]  David J. Brown,et al.  Appropriate input devices for students with learning and motor skills difficulties: report to the National Council for Educational Technology , 1997 .

[18]  M. Scaife,et al.  Developmental changes in childrens’ use of computer input devices , 1991 .

[19]  A. G. Fisher,et al.  Uniting practice and theory in an occupational framework. 1998 Eleanor Clarke Slagle Lecture. , 1998, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[20]  Gerd Johansson,et al.  Special Considerations for Navigation and Interaction in Virtual Environments for People with Brain Injury , 2000 .

[21]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  An Age-Related Comparison of a Touchscreen and a Novel Input Device , 2002 .

[22]  F. D. Rose,et al.  Assessing stroke patients’ prospective memory using virtual reality , 2004, Brain injury.

[23]  Sue Cobb,et al.  Designing virtual learning environments for people with learning disabilities: usability issues , 2000 .

[24]  Kenneth J Ottenbacher,et al.  A virtual reality environment for evaluation of a daily living skill in brain injury rehabilitation: reliability and validity. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  John Karat,et al.  A Comparison of Menu Selection Techniques: Touch Panel, Mouse and Keyboard , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[26]  Albert A. Rizzo,et al.  Virtual environment applications in clinical neuropsychology , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2000 (Cat. No.00CB37048).

[27]  Cynthia J. Cress,et al.  The Relationship between Cognitive Load Measurements and Estimates of Computer Input Control Skills , 1994 .

[28]  Alan Chamberlain,et al.  A comparative investigation into two pointing systems for use with wearable computers while mobile , 2004, Eighth International Symposium on Wearable Computers.

[29]  Penny Standen,et al.  Problems with control devices experienced by people with intellectual disabilities using virtual environments: a systematic evaluation , 2004 .

[30]  Ivan Poupyrev,et al.  An Introduction to 3-D User Interface Design , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[31]  John Cromby,et al.  Successful transfer to the real world of skills practised in a virtual environment by students with severe learning difficulties , 1996 .

[32]  Robert L. Mack,et al.  A Comparison of Touch and Mouse Interaction Techniques for a Graphical Windowing Software Environment , 1991 .

[33]  Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al.  Interaction Devices and Web Design for Novice Older Users , 2005 .

[34]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[35]  David J. Brown,et al.  Development and Evaluation of the Virtual City , 1999, Int. J. Virtual Real..

[36]  B. Shneiderman,et al.  Touch screens now offer compelling uses , 1991, IEEE Software.

[37]  M. Kew,et al.  Special Considerations , 2019, ACL Injuries in Female Athletes.

[38]  Deborah Hix,et al.  User Interface Design Guidelines for Computer Accessibility by Mentally Retarded Adults , 1994 .

[39]  Douglas Frye,et al.  Mastering the Machine: A Comparison of the Mouse and Touch Screen for Children's Use of Computers , 1992, ICCAL.

[40]  Cyrus Shahabi,et al.  Virtual Environments for the Assessment of Attention and Memory Processes: The Virtual Classroom and Office , 2002 .

[41]  K. Ottenbacher,et al.  Task performance in virtual environments used for cognitive rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.