Improving Biodiversity Data Retrieval through Semantic Search and Ontologies

Due to the increased amount of available biodiversity data, many biodiversity research institutions are now making their databases openly available on the web. Researchers in the field use this databases to extract new knowledge and also share their own discoveries. However, when these researchers need to find relevant information in the data, they still rely on the traditional search approach, based on text matching, that is not appropriate to be used in these large amounts of heterogeneous biodiversity's data, leading to search results with low precision and recall. We present a new architecture that tackle this problem using a semantic search system for biodiversity data. Semantic search aims to improve search accuracy by using ontologies to understand user objectives and the contextual meaning of terms used in the search to generate more relevant results. Biodiversity data is mapped to terms from relevant ontologies, such as Darwin Core, DBpedia, Ontobio and Catalogue of Life, stored using semantic web formats and queried using semantic web tools (such as triple stores). A prototype semantic search tool was successfully implemented and evaluated by users from the National Research Institute for the Amazon (INPA). Our results show that the semantic search approach has a better precision (28% improvement) and recall (25% improvement) when compared to keyword based search, when used in a big set of representative biodiversity data (206,000 records) from INPA and the Emilio Gueldi Museum in Pará (MPEG). We also show that, because the biodiversity data is now in semantic web format and mapped to ontology terms, it is easy to enhance it with information from other sources, an example using deforestation data (from the National Institute of Space Research - INPE) to enrich collection data is shown.

[1]  Jefersson Alex dos Santos,et al.  Sinimbu - Multimodal Queries to Support Biodiversity Studies , 2012, ICCSA.

[2]  Andréa Corrêa Florês Albuquerque Desenvolvimento de uma ontologia de domínio para modelagem de biodiversidade , 2011 .

[3]  Gerard Salton,et al.  The SMART Retrieval System—Experiments in Automatic Document Processing , 1971 .

[4]  Jérôme Gensel,et al.  Towards the Geo-spatial Querying of the Semantic Web with ONTOAST , 2007, W2GIS.

[5]  Neelam Duhan,et al.  A semantic search system using query definitions , 2010, IITM '10.

[6]  James A. Hendler,et al.  The Semantic Web" in Scientific American , 2001 .

[7]  Tomi Kauppinen,et al.  Linked Open Science-Communicating, Sharing and Evaluating Data, Methods and Results for Executable Papers , 2011, ICCS.

[8]  Jing Wang,et al.  An ontology-based semantic search model study , 2010, 2010 Third International Symposium on Knowledge Acquisition and Modeling.

[9]  Santos Campos,et al.  A biodiversity information system in an open data/metadatabase architecture , 2003 .

[10]  Fernanda Araujo Baião,et al.  An architecture to support information sources discovery through semantic search , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse & Integration.

[11]  Christoph Mangold,et al.  A survey and classification of semantic search approaches , 2007, Int. J. Metadata Semant. Ontologies.

[12]  Shawn Bowers,et al.  Improving Data Discovery for Metadata Repositories through Semantic Search , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems.

[13]  Jinhui Xiong,et al.  An Ontology-Based Semantic Search Approach for Geosciences , 2009, 2009 Second International Symposium on Knowledge Acquisition and Modeling.

[14]  Gerd Wagner,et al.  Design rationale of RuleML - a markup language for the semantic web , 2001 .