Molecular dynamics-driven drug discovery: leaping forward with confidence.

Given the significant time and financial costs of developing a commercial drug, it remains important to constantly reform the drug discovery pipeline with novel technologies that can narrow the candidates down to the most promising lead compounds for clinical testing. The past decade has witnessed tremendous growth in computational capabilities that enable in silico approaches to expedite drug discovery processes. Molecular dynamics (MD) has become a particularly important tool in drug design and discovery. From classical MD methods to more sophisticated hybrid classical/quantum mechanical (QM) approaches, MD simulations are now able to offer extraordinary insights into ligand-receptor interactions. In this review, we discuss how the applications of MD approaches are significantly transforming current drug discovery and development efforts.

[1]  K. Morokuma,et al.  ONIOM: A Multilayered Integrated MO + MM Method for Geometry Optimizations and Single Point Energy Predictions. A Test for Diels−Alder Reactions and Pt(P(t-Bu)3)2 + H2 Oxidative Addition , 1996 .

[2]  Jonathan Y. Mane,et al.  Ensemble-based virtual screening reveals dual-inhibitors for the p53-MDM2/MDMX interactions. , 2010, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[3]  Hans-Joachim Böhm,et al.  The computer program LUDI: A new method for the de novo design of enzyme inhibitors , 1992, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[4]  John P. Overington,et al.  ChEMBL: a large-scale bioactivity database for drug discovery , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[5]  Enrico Glaab,et al.  Building a virtual ligand screening pipeline using free software: a survey , 2015, Briefings Bioinform..

[6]  Hoover,et al.  Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. , 1985, Physical review. A, General physics.

[7]  Vibhas Aravamuthan,et al.  Time-Averaged Distributions of Solute and Solvent Motions: Exploring Proton Wires of GFP and PfM2DH , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[8]  Alessandra Nurisso,et al.  How the flexibility of human histone deacetylases influences ligand binding: an overview. , 2015, Drug discovery today.

[9]  Yi-Ping Phoebe Chen,et al.  Quantum polarized ligand docking investigation to understand the significance of protonation states in histone deacetylase inhibitors. , 2013, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[10]  Alexios-Leandros Skaltsounis,et al.  An evaluation of indirubin analogues as phosphorylase kinase inhibitors. , 2015, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[11]  B. Tidor Molecular dynamics simulations , 1997, Current Biology.

[12]  Cristiano Ruch Werneck Guimarães,et al.  Addressing Limitations with the MM-GB/SA Scoring Procedure using the WaterMap Method and Free Energy Perturbation Calculations , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[13]  W. G. Hoover molecular dynamics , 1986, Catalysis from A to Z.

[14]  Robert A Pearlstein,et al.  Estimation of Solvation Entropy and Enthalpy via Analysis of Water Oxygen-Hydrogen Correlations. , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[15]  Atul Agarwal,et al.  Free Energy Calculations: Use and Limitations in Predicting Ligand Binding Affinities , 2007 .

[16]  Diane Joseph-McCarthy,et al.  Ensemble-Based Docking Using Biased Molecular Dynamics , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[17]  Marissa G. Saunders,et al.  Coarse-graining methods for computational biology. , 2013, Annual review of biophysics.

[18]  Ron Diskin,et al.  A novel lipid binding site formed by the MAP kinase insert in p38 alpha. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  Gerhard Wolber,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulation and linear interaction energy study of d-Glu-based inhibitors of the MurD ligase , 2013, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[20]  Lahana,et al.  How many leads from HTS? , 1999, Drug discovery today.

[21]  H. Grubmüller,et al.  Constant pH Molecular Dynamics in Explicit Solvent with λ-Dynamics , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[22]  Vahid Mirjalili,et al.  Physics‐based protein structure refinement through multiple molecular dynamics trajectories and structure averaging , 2014, Proteins.

[23]  Gerhard Wolber,et al.  The impact of molecular dynamics on drug design: applications for the characterization of ligand-macromolecule complexes. , 2015, Drug discovery today.

[24]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  I. Kuntz,et al.  DOCK 6: combining techniques to model RNA-small molecule complexes. , 2009, RNA.

[26]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Theory of protein folding: the energy landscape perspective. , 1997, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[27]  Charles C. David,et al.  Principal component analysis: a method for determining the essential dynamics of proteins. , 2014, Methods in molecular biology.

[28]  David E. Shaw,et al.  The future of molecular dynamics simulations in drug discovery , 2011, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[29]  Johannes Grotendorst,et al.  Hierarchical Methods for Dynamics in Complex Molecular Systems , 2012 .

[30]  David S. Wishart,et al.  DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[31]  Weiliang Zhu,et al.  A comparative study of trypsin specificity based on QM/MM molecular dynamics simulation and QM/MM GBSA calculation , 2015, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[32]  Chao Li,et al.  Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase by two genistein derivatives: kinetic analysis, molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation , 2014, Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B.

[33]  G. Wolber,et al.  Benzene-1,3-dicarboxylic acid 2,5-dimethylpyrrole derivatives as multiple inhibitors of bacterial Mur ligases (MurC-MurF). , 2014, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[34]  Robert T. C. Brownlee,et al.  Effect of atomic charge, solvation, entropy, and ligand protonation state on MM‐PB(GB)SA binding energies of HIV protease , 2012, J. Comput. Chem..

[35]  Ruibo Wu,et al.  Molecular Dynamics-Based Virtual Screening: Accelerating the Drug Discovery Process by High-Performance Computing , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[36]  Robert Abel,et al.  Motifs for molecular recognition exploiting hydrophobic enclosure in protein–ligand binding , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Yanli Wang,et al.  PubChem: Integrated Platform of Small Molecules and Biological Activities , 2008 .

[38]  Julian Tirado-Rives,et al.  Computer-aided design of non-nucleoside inhibitors of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. , 2006, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[39]  Alessandro Laio,et al.  A Hamiltonian electrostatic coupling scheme for hybrid Car-Parrinello molecular dynamics simulations , 2002 .

[40]  M. Tuckerman Ab initio molecular dynamics: basic concepts, current trends and novel applications , 2002 .

[41]  Manga Vijjulatha,et al.  Induced fit docking, pharmacophore modeling, and molecular dynamic simulations on thiazolidinedione derivatives to explore key interactions with Tyr48 in polyol pathway , 2014, Journal of Molecular Modeling.

[42]  Themis Lazaridis,et al.  Thermodynamics of buried water clusters at a protein-ligand binding interface. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[43]  C. Higgs,et al.  Hydration Site Thermodynamics Explain SARs for Triazolylpurines Analogues Binding to the A2A Receptor. , 2010, ACS medicinal chemistry letters.

[44]  Chang-Guo Zhan,et al.  Binding free energies for nicotine analogs inhibiting cytochrome P450 2A6 by a combined use of molecular dynamics simulations and QM/MM-PBSA calculations. , 2014, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[45]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Target-oriented and diversity-oriented organic synthesis in drug discovery. , 2000, Science.

[46]  Dandan Jiang,et al.  Development, applications and challenges of ReaxFF reactive force field in molecular simulations , 2016, Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering.

[47]  Jacob D. Durrant,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations and drug discovery , 2011, BMC Biology.

[48]  Yi-Ping Phoebe Chen,et al.  Ligand release mechanisms and channels in histone deacetylases , 2013, J. Comput. Chem..

[49]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[50]  Gerhard Wolber,et al.  Inhibitor Design Strategy Based on an Enzyme Structural Flexibility: A Case of Bacterial MurD Ligase , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[51]  Benjamin T. Miller,et al.  Constant pH Molecular Dynamics in Explicit Solvent with Enveloping Distribution Sampling and Hamiltonian Exchange , 2014, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[52]  Miklos Feher,et al.  Property Distributions: Differences Between Drugs, Natural Products, and Molecules from Combinatorial Chemistry. , 2003 .

[53]  M. A. González,et al.  Force fields and molecular dynamics simulations , 2011 .

[54]  Bernard R Brooks,et al.  Computational scheme for pH‐dependent binding free energy calculation with explicit solvent , 2015, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[55]  Demetri T. Moustakas,et al.  Evaluating Free Energies of Binding and Conservation of Crystallographic Waters Using SZMAP , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[56]  Maurizio Recanatini,et al.  A computational study of the binding of propidium to the peripheral anionic site of human acetylcholinesterase. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[57]  Felice C. Lightstone,et al.  Accounting for water molecules in drug design , 2011, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[58]  B. Shoichet,et al.  Soft docking and multiple receptor conformations in virtual screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[59]  J. Dye,et al.  Design and characterization of ebolavirus GP prehairpin intermediate mimics as drug targets , 2015, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[60]  M. Alam,et al.  Allosteric pocket of the dengue virus (serotype 2) NS2B/NS3 protease: In silico ligand screening and molecular dynamics studies of inhibition. , 2014, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[61]  Sudhir B. Kylasa,et al.  The ReaxFF reactive force-field: development, applications and future directions , 2016 .

[62]  Tingjun Hou,et al.  Assessing the Performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA Methods. 1. The Accuracy of Binding Free Energy Calculations Based on Molecular Dynamics Simulations , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[63]  Alexander Tropsha,et al.  Discrete Molecular Dynamics Distinguishes Nativelike Binding Poses from Decoys in Difficult Targets , 2022 .

[64]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Molecular docking to ensembles of protein structures. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[65]  Simone Marsili,et al.  ORAC: A molecular dynamics simulation program to explore free energy surfaces in biomolecular systems at the atomistic level , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[66]  Xiaoqin Zou,et al.  Scoring functions and their evaluation methods for protein-ligand docking: recent advances and future directions. , 2010, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[67]  Georgios Archontis,et al.  Kinetics, in silico docking, molecular dynamics, and MM‐GBSA binding studies on prototype indirubins, KT5720, and staurosporine as phosphorylase kinase ATP‐binding site inhibitors: The role of water molecules examined , 2011, Proteins.

[68]  Emil Alexov,et al.  Protonation and pK changes in protein–ligand binding , 2013, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[69]  Ajit Jadhav,et al.  Structural insight into exosite binding and discovery of novel exosite inhibitors of botulinum neurotoxin serotype A through in silico screening , 2014, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[70]  F. J. Luque,et al.  New tacrine-huperzine A hybrids (huprines): highly potent tight-binding acetylcholinesterase inhibitors of interest for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[71]  J. Taubenberger,et al.  Influenza : the Mother of All Pandemics , 2022 .

[72]  J. Irwin,et al.  ZINC ? A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening. , 2005 .

[73]  John J. Irwin,et al.  ZINC 15 – Ligand Discovery for Everyone , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[74]  Allam Appa Rao,et al.  Advances in binding free energies calculations: QM/MM-based free energy perturbation method for drug design. , 2013, Current pharmaceutical design.

[75]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Folding funnels and binding mechanisms. , 1999, Protein engineering.

[76]  Thom Vreven,et al.  Combining Quantum Mechanics Methods with Molecular Mechanics Methods in ONIOM. , 2006, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[77]  Rolando Perez-Pineiro,et al.  Small Molecule Inhibitors of ERCC1-XPF Protein-Protein Interaction Synergize Alkylating Agents in Cancer Cells , 2013, Molecular Pharmacology.

[78]  Car,et al.  Unified approach for molecular dynamics and density-functional theory. , 1985, Physical review letters.

[79]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .

[80]  B. L. de Groot,et al.  Computer simulations of structure-activity relationships for HERG channel blockers. , 2011, Biochemistry.

[81]  J. Gready,et al.  Combining docking and molecular dynamic simulations in drug design , 2006, Medicinal research reviews.

[82]  Gang Fu,et al.  Molecular modeling to provide insight into the substrate binding and catalytic mechanism of human biliverdin-IXα reductase. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[83]  A. Caflisch,et al.  Molecular dynamics in drug design. , 2015, European journal of medicinal chemistry.

[84]  Rafael C. Bernardi,et al.  Enhanced sampling techniques in molecular dynamics simulations of biological systems. , 2015, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[85]  Pedro Alexandrino Fernandes,et al.  Detailed atomistic analysis of the HIV-1 protease interface. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[86]  Samuel Genheden,et al.  How to obtain statistically converged MM/GBSA results , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[87]  Woody Sherman,et al.  Contribution of Explicit Solvent Effects to the Binding Affinity of Small‐Molecule Inhibitors in Blood Coagulation Factor Serine Proteases , 2011, ChemMedChem.

[88]  Brian K. Shoichet,et al.  The incorporation of protein flexibility and conformational energy penalties in docking screens to improve ligand discovery , 2014, Nature chemistry.

[89]  Jack A. Tuszynski,et al.  A Refined Model of the HCV NS5A Protein Bound to Daclatasvir Explains Drug-Resistant Mutations and Activity against Divergent Genotypes , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[90]  Pengyu Y. Ren,et al.  Polarizable Atomic Multipole Water Model for Molecular Mechanics Simulation , 2003 .

[91]  Angelo Carotti,et al.  Screening of benzamidine-based thrombin inhibitors via a linear interaction energy in continuum electrostatics model , 2010, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[92]  Adrian E Roitberg,et al.  Enhancing Conformation and Protonation State Sampling of Hen Egg White Lysozyme Using pH Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics. , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[93]  Christofer S. Tautermann,et al.  What can we learn from molecular dynamics simulations for GPCR drug design? , 2014, Computational and structural biotechnology journal.

[94]  Matthew P. Repasky,et al.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[95]  W. Sherman,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of water molecules at the surface of proteins and applications to binding site prediction and characterization , 2011, Proteins.

[96]  T. Šolmajer,et al.  MurD ligase from E. coli: Tetrahedral intermediate formation study by hybrid quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical replica path method , 2009, Proteins.

[97]  Youyong Li,et al.  Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 4. Accuracies of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methodologies evaluated by various simulation protocols using PDBbind data set. , 2014, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[98]  Jian Zhang,et al.  How to Improve Docking Accuracy of AutoDock4.2: A Case Study Using Different Electrostatic Potentials , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[99]  J. Bradner,et al.  On the inhibition of histone deacetylase 8. , 2010, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[100]  Tingjun Hou,et al.  Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 5. Improved docking performance using high solute dielectric constant MM/GBSA and MM/PBSA rescoring. , 2014, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[101]  Albert C. Pan,et al.  Structure and Dynamics of the M3 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor , 2012, Nature.

[102]  Heather A Carlson,et al.  Small molecule inhibitors of the MDM2-p53 interaction discovered by ensemble-based receptor models. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[103]  H. Hamm,et al.  Conformational flexibility and structural dynamics in GPCR-mediated G protein activation: a perspective. , 2013, Journal of molecular biology.

[104]  Wilfred F. van Gunsteren,et al.  Free enthalpies of replacing water molecules in protein binding pockets , 2012, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[105]  James R Horn,et al.  Allosteric inhibition through core disruption. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[106]  Guanglei Cui,et al.  SPAM: A Simple Approach for Profiling Bound Water Molecules. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[107]  Thomas Kodadek The Rise, Fall and Reinvention of Combinatorial Chemistry , 2011 .

[108]  Jacob Kongsted,et al.  Binding free energy based structural dynamics analysis of HIV-1 RT RNase H-inhibitor complexes. , 2014, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[109]  Gabriele Cruciani,et al.  A Common Reference Framework for Analyzing/Comparing Proteins and Ligands. Fingerprints for Ligands And Proteins (FLAP): Theory and Application , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[110]  Jana K. Shen,et al.  Continuous Constant pH Molecular Dynamics in Explicit Solvent with pH-Based Replica Exchange. , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[111]  Nikos L. Doltsinis,et al.  Molecular Dynamics Simulation: From “Ab Initio” to “Coarse Grained” , 2011 .

[112]  Thomas Fox,et al.  Accuracy Assessment and Automation of Free Energy Calculations for Drug Design , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[113]  John E Kerrigan,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations in drug design. , 2013, Methods in molecular biology.

[114]  Q. Cui,et al.  pKa calculations in solution and proteins with QM/MM free energy perturbation simulations: a quantitative test of QM/MM protocols. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[115]  Subha Kalyaanamoorthy,et al.  Modelling and enhanced molecular dynamics to steer structure-based drug discovery. , 2014, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[116]  Luís C. Lamb,et al.  Three-dimensional protein structure prediction: Methods and computational strategies , 2014, Comput. Biol. Chem..

[117]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Discovery of a novel binding trench in HIV integrase. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[118]  Michael K. Gilson,et al.  Solvation thermodynamic mapping of molecular surfaces in AmberTools: GIST , 2016, J. Comput. Chem..

[119]  Vahid Mirjalili,et al.  Protein Structure Refinement through Structure Selection and Averaging from Molecular Dynamics Ensembles. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[120]  Donald Hamelberg,et al.  Enhanced molecular dynamics sampling of drug target conformations , 2016, Biopolymers.

[121]  D. Newman,et al.  Natural Products as Sources of New Drugs from 1981 to 2014. , 2016, Journal of natural products.

[122]  G. Wolber,et al.  Computational close up on protein–protein interactions: how to unravel the invisible using molecular dynamics simulations? , 2015 .

[123]  Stephen A. Wells,et al.  The flexibility and dynamics of protein disulfide isomerase , 2016, Proteins.

[124]  Attilio V Vargiu,et al.  Multidrug binding properties of the AcrB efflux pump characterized by molecular dynamics simulations , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[125]  Simona Golic Grdadolnik,et al.  Furan-based benzene mono- and dicarboxylic acid derivatives as multiple inhibitors of the bacterial Mur ligases (MurC–MurF): experimental and computational characterization , 2015, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[126]  Maria Cristina Gamberini,et al.  Discovery of new inhibitors of aldose reductase from molecular docking and database screening. , 2002, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[127]  Stewart A. Adcock,et al.  Molecular Dynamics: Survey of Methods for Simulating the Activity of Proteins , 2006 .

[128]  Mohsen Shahlaei,et al.  A Conformational Analysis Study on the Melanocortin 4 Receptor Using Multiple Molecular Dynamics Simulations , 2015, Chemical biology & drug design.

[129]  Jana K. Shen,et al.  Charge-leveling and proper treatment of long-range electrostatics in all-atom molecular dynamics at constant pH. , 2012, The Journal of chemical physics.

[130]  Elizabeth A. Harker,et al.  In Silico Improvement of beta3-peptide inhibitors of p53 x hDM2 and p53 x hDMX. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[131]  Hassane S. Mchaourab,et al.  On the Origin of Large Flexibility of P-glycoprotein in the Inward-facing State* , 2013, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[132]  Janet E. Jones On the determination of molecular fields. —II. From the equation of state of a gas , 1924 .

[133]  Nevena Todorova,et al.  Systematic comparison of empirical forcefields for molecular dynamic simulation of insulin. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[134]  Fabio Stella,et al.  Conformational and functional analysis of molecular dynamics trajectories by Self-Organising Maps , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[135]  Francesca Tavazza,et al.  Considerations for choosing and using force fields and interatomic potentials in materials science and engineering , 2013 .

[136]  Wilfred F van Gunsteren,et al.  On the calculation of velocity-dependent properties in molecular dynamics simulations using the leapfrog integration algorithm. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[137]  Luiz Augusto Basso,et al.  Combining molecular dynamics and docking simulations of the cytidine deaminase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv , 2012, Journal of Molecular Modeling.

[138]  D. Koshland The Key–Lock Theory and the Induced Fit Theory , 1995 .

[139]  Themis Lazaridis,et al.  Computing the thermodynamic contributions of interfacial water. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[140]  Hong Qian,et al.  Chemical Biophysics: Quantitative Analysis of Cellular Systems , 2008 .

[141]  P. Kollman,et al.  A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules , 1995 .

[142]  Shiyang Long,et al.  Hierarchical Conformational Analysis of Native Lysozyme Based on Sub-Millisecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations , 2015, PloS one.

[143]  Gerardo Soto-Campos,et al.  Deriving the isothermal–isobaric ensemble: The requirement of a “shell” molecule and applicability to small systems , 1998 .

[144]  M. Levitt,et al.  Theoretical studies of enzymic reactions: dielectric, electrostatic and steric stabilization of the carbonium ion in the reaction of lysozyme. , 1976, Journal of molecular biology.

[145]  Rilei Yu,et al.  Dual-inhibitors of STAT5 and STAT3: studies from molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations , 2014, Journal of Molecular Modeling.

[146]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath , 1984 .

[147]  Antony J. Williams,et al.  ChemSpider:: An Online Chemical Information Resource , 2010 .

[148]  Qing-Chuan Zheng,et al.  Exploring the mechanism how AF9 recognizes and binds H3K9ac by molecular dynamics simulations and free energy calculations , 2016, Biopolymers.

[149]  J. D. Doll,et al.  Generalized Langevin equation approach for atom/solid-surface scattering: General formulation for classical scattering off harmonic solids , 1976 .

[150]  Bilge Bicak,et al.  Molecular Docking and Molecular Dynamics Studies of L-Glycyl-L-Glutamic Acid Dipeptide , 2019, Bilge International Journal of Science and Technology Research.

[151]  Hugo Gutiérrez-de-Terán,et al.  Computational analysis of plasmepsin IV bound to an allophenylnorstatine inhibitor , 2006, FEBS letters.

[152]  J. Tuszynski,et al.  Relaxed complex scheme suggests novel inhibitors for the lyase activity of DNA polymerase beta. , 2011, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[153]  H. C. Andersen Rattle: A “velocity” version of the shake algorithm for molecular dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[154]  Huanxiang Liu,et al.  Computational study on the drug resistance mechanism of hepatitis C virus NS5B RNA-dependent RNA polymerase mutants to BMS-791325 by molecular dynamics simulation and binding free energy calculations , 2016 .

[155]  L. Verlet Computer "Experiments" on Classical Fluids. I. Thermodynamical Properties of Lennard-Jones Molecules , 1967 .

[156]  Stuart L. Schreiber,et al.  Gold(I)-Catalyzed Coupling Reactions for the Synthesis of Diverse Small Molecules Using the Build/Couple/Pair Strategy , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[157]  Mark Embrey,et al.  A naphthyridine carboxamide provides evidence for discordant resistance between mechanistically identical inhibitors of HIV-1 integrase. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[158]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Statistical mechanics and molecular dynamics in evaluating thermodynamic properties of biomolecular recognition , 2011, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[159]  Christophe Chevalier,et al.  Molecular Dynamics Studies of the Nucleoprotein of Influenza A Virus: Role of the Protein Flexibility in RNA Binding , 2012, PloS one.

[160]  J. Richardson,et al.  Cell Method in Grand Canonical Ensemble , 1960 .

[161]  Pramod C. Nair,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations: from structure function relationships to drug discovery , 2014, In Silico Pharmacology.

[162]  Marawan Ahmed,et al.  Human PD-1 binds differently to its human ligands: a comprehensive modeling study. , 2015, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[163]  P Willett,et al.  Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[164]  Xiaoqin Zou,et al.  Advances and Challenges in Protein-Ligand Docking , 2010, International journal of molecular sciences.

[165]  Stefano Alcaro,et al.  Synthesis and biological assessment of novel 2-thiazolylhydrazones and computational analysis of their recognition by monoamine oxidase B. , 2012, European journal of medicinal chemistry.

[166]  S. K. Pradhan,et al.  A conformational analysis of mouse Nalp3 domain structures by molecular dynamics simulations, and binding site analysis. , 2014, Molecular bioSystems.

[167]  Giulio Rastelli,et al.  Application of a post-docking procedure based on MM-PBSA and MM-GBSA on single and multiple protein conformations. , 2012, European journal of medicinal chemistry.

[168]  T. Darden,et al.  Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems , 1993 .

[169]  Margaret E. Johnson,et al.  Current status of the AMOEBA polarizable force field. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[170]  Scott Myers,et al.  Drug discovery—an operating model for a new era , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[171]  P. Kastritis,et al.  On the binding affinity of macromolecular interactions: daring to ask why proteins interact , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[172]  Michael Houghton,et al.  A human ether-á-go-go-related (hERG) ion channel atomistic model generated by long supercomputer molecular dynamics simulations and its use in predicting drug cardiotoxicity. , 2014, Toxicology letters.

[173]  Chris Baker Polarizable force fields for molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules , 2015 .

[174]  T. Šolmajer,et al.  Targeted molecular dynamics simulation studies of binding and conformational changes in E. coli MurD , 2007, Proteins.

[175]  W. C. Swope,et al.  A computer simulation method for the calculation of equilibrium constants for the formation of physi , 1981 .

[176]  Yan Wang,et al.  Molecular Dynamics Simulation on the Conformational Transition of the Mad2 Protein from the Open to the Closed State , 2014, International journal of molecular sciences.

[177]  J. Aqvist,et al.  A new method for predicting binding affinity in computer-aided drug design. , 1994, Protein engineering.

[178]  Martin Frank,et al.  Understanding the Specificity of Human Galectin-8C Domain Interactions with Its Glycan Ligands Based on Molecular Dynamics Simulations , 2013, PloS one.

[179]  T. Šolmajer,et al.  MurD ligase from Escherichia coli: C-terminal domain closing motion , 2012 .

[180]  Nicolas Foloppe,et al.  Rigorous Free Energy Calculations in Structure‐Based Drug Design , 2010, Molecular informatics.

[181]  Qing-Chuan Zheng,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations studies and free energy analysis on inhibitors of MDM2-p53 interaction. , 2013, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[182]  Umesh Yadava,et al.  Stabilization of Microtubules by Taxane Diterpenoids: Insight from Docking and MD simulations , 2015, Journal of biological physics.

[183]  Maurizio Botta,et al.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Structural Analysis of Giardia duodenalis 14-3-3 Protein-Protein Interactions , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[184]  Michael K Gilson,et al.  Grid inhomogeneous solvation theory: hydration structure and thermodynamics of the miniature receptor cucurbit[7]uril. , 2012, The Journal of chemical physics.

[185]  Anand Anbarasu,et al.  Molecular docking and molecular dynamics studies on β-lactamases and penicillin binding proteins. , 2014, Molecular bioSystems.

[186]  Wen-Ting Chu,et al.  Drug design benefits from molecular dynamics: some examples. , 2013, Current computer-aided drug design.

[187]  Yi-Ping Phoebe Chen,et al.  A steered molecular dynamics mediated hit discovery for histone deacetylases. , 2014, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[188]  Wilfred F. van Gunsteren,et al.  Parametrization of aliphatic CHn united atoms of GROMOS96 force field , 1998, J. Comput. Chem..

[189]  Michael Feig,et al.  Local Protein Structure Refinement via Molecular Dynamics Simulations with locPREFMD , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[190]  Jennifer L. Knight,et al.  Accurate and reliable prediction of relative ligand binding potency in prospective drug discovery by way of a modern free-energy calculation protocol and force field. , 2015, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[191]  Berk Hess,et al.  LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations , 1997 .

[192]  Woody Sherman,et al.  High‐energy water sites determine peptide binding affinity and specificity of PDZ domains , 2009, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[193]  S. Genheden,et al.  The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities , 2015, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[194]  J. Taubenberger,et al.  1918 Influenza: the Mother of All Pandemics , 2006, Emerging infectious diseases.

[195]  Pin-Chih Su,et al.  Comparison of radii sets, entropy, QM methods, and sampling on MM‐PBSA, MM‐GBSA, and QM/MM‐GBSA ligand binding energies of F. tularensis enoyl‐ACP reductase (FabI) , 2015, J. Comput. Chem..

[196]  Jiali Gao,et al.  Determination of the structure form of the fourth ligand of zinc in Acutolysin A using combined quantum mechanical and molecular mechanical simulation. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[197]  Alexander D. MacKerell Empirical force fields for biological macromolecules: Overview and issues , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[198]  Hugo Gutiérrez-de-Terán,et al.  Linear interaction energy: method and applications in drug design. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[199]  William L. Jorgensen,et al.  FEP-guided selection of bicyclic heterocycles in lead optimization for non-nucleoside inhibitors of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. , 2006 .

[200]  A. Cavalli,et al.  Role of Molecular Dynamics and Related Methods in Drug Discovery. , 2016, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[201]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[202]  S. Nosé A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods , 1984 .

[203]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Computation of pH‐dependent binding free energies , 2016, Biopolymers.

[204]  Mai Suan Li,et al.  Effects of Water Models on Binding Affinity: Evidence from All-Atom Simulation of Binding of Tamiflu to A/H5N1 Neuraminidase , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[205]  Berk Hess,et al.  LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations , 1997, J. Comput. Chem..

[206]  Chia-en A. Chang,et al.  Insights from free-energy calculations: protein conformational equilibrium, driving forces, and ligand-binding modes. , 2012, Biophysical journal.