Maternal Effect on Female Caste Determination in a Social Insect

Caste differentiation and division of labor are the hallmarks of social insect colonies [1, 2]. The current dogma for female caste differentiation is that female eggs are totipotent, with morphological and physiological differences between queens and workers stemming from a developmental switch during the larval stage controlled by nutritional and other environmental factors (e.g., [3-8]). In this study, we tested whether maternal effects influence caste differentiation in Pogonomyrmex harvester ants. By conducting crossfostering experiments we identified two key factors in the process of caste determination. New queens were produced only from eggs laid by queens exposed to cold. Moreover, there was a strong age effect, with development into queens occurring only in eggs laid by queens that were at least two years old. Biochemical analyses further revealed that the level of ecdysteroids was significantly lower in eggs developing into queens than workers. By contrast, we found no significant effect of colony size or worker exposure to cold, suggesting that the trigger for caste differentiation may be independent of the quantity and quality of resources provided to larvae. Altogether these data demonstrate that the developmental fate of female brood is strongly influenced by maternal effects in ants of the genus Pogonomyrmex.

[1]  M. Thomas Seasonality and colony-size effects on the life-history characteristics of Rhytidoponera metallica in temperate south-eastern Australia , 2003 .

[2]  A. Buschinger,et al.  Genetically Mediated Queen Polymorphism and Caste Determination in the Slave-making Ant, Harpagoxenus sublaevis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 1986 .

[3]  M. Petersen-Braun Untersuchungen zur sozialen Organisation der PharaoameiseMonomorium pharaonis L. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) II. Die Kastendeterminierung , 1977, Insectes Sociaux.

[4]  E. Vargo,et al.  Changes in juvenile hormone biosynthetic rate and whole body content in maturing virgin queens of Solenopsis invicta. , 2003, Journal of insect physiology.

[5]  A. Bourke,et al.  Ant workers selfishly bias sex ratios by manipulating female development , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  B. Cole,et al.  Colony size and reproduction in the western harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis , 2000, Insectes Sociaux.

[7]  T. Wenseleers,et al.  Caste fate conflict in swarm‐founding social Hymenoptera: an inclusive fitness analysis , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[8]  L. Keller,et al.  Genetic caste determination in Pogonomyrmex harvester ants imposes costs during colony founding , 2006, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[9]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Reproductive conflicts in social animals: who has power? , 2003 .

[10]  L. Keller,et al.  Loss of Phenotypic Plasticity Generates Genotype-Caste Association in Harvester Ants , 2004, Current Biology.

[11]  N. Lo,et al.  Sex-Linked Genetic Influence on Caste Determination in a Termite , 2007, Science.

[12]  W. Tschinkel THE REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF FIRE ANT SOCIETIES , 1998 .

[13]  L. Keller,et al.  Sex Ratio Conflict and Worker Production in Eusocial Hymenoptera , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[14]  L. Keller,et al.  Characterization and distribution of Pogonomyrmex harvester ant lineages with genetic caste determination , 2006, Molecular ecology.

[15]  L. Passera,et al.  Ecdysteroid titre and caste determination in the ant,Pheidole pallidula (Nyl.) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 1980, Experientia.

[16]  J. Fewell,et al.  Distribution and evolution of genetic caste determination in Pogonomyrmex seed-harvester ants. , 2006, Ecology.

[17]  L. Keller,et al.  Conditional Use of Sex and Parthenogenesis for Worker and Queen Production in Ants , 2004, Science.

[18]  G. Dogra,et al.  Comparative morphology of different larval instars of apple fruit moth, Argyresthia conjugella Zeller , 1993 .

[19]  Diana E. Wheeler,et al.  Developmental and Physiological Determinants of Caste in Social Hymenoptera: Evolutionary Implications , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[20]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Founding, foraging, and fighting: colony size and the spatial distribution of harvester ant nests , 1996 .

[21]  J. Heinze,et al.  Clonal reproduction and genetic caste differences in a queen-polymorphic ant, Vollenhovia emeryi , 2006, Biology Letters.

[22]  L. Gilbert,et al.  Simplification of the ecdysteroid radioimmunoassay by the use of protein A fromStaphylococcus aureus , 1984, Experientia.

[23]  C. Moreau,et al.  Phylogeny of the Ants: Diversification in the Age of Angiosperms , 2006, Science.

[24]  L. Keller,et al.  Clonal reproduction by males and females in the little fire ant , 2005, Nature.

[25]  L. Passera,et al.  Gyne development in the Argentine ant Iridomyrmex humilis: role of overwintering and queen control , 1992 .

[26]  R. Matthews,et al.  Ants. , 1898, Science.

[27]  Jürgen Gadau,et al.  Genetic determination of the queen caste in an ant hybrid zone , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  U. Mueller,et al.  Queens versus workers: sex-ratio conflict in eusocial Hymenoptera , 2003 .

[29]  K. Foster,et al.  Conflict resolution in insect societies. , 2006, Annual review of entomology.

[30]  E. Wilson The Insect Societies , 1974 .

[31]  L. Keller,et al.  The role of queen pheromones in social insects: queen control or queen signal? , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[32]  REPRODUCTIVE DIVISION OF LABOR BETWEEN HYBRID AND NONHYBRID OFFSPRING IN A FIRE ANT HYBRID ZONE , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[33]  B. Hölldobler,et al.  The behavioral ecology of mating in harvester ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Pogonomyrmex) , 1976, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[34]  L. Keller,et al.  Complex hybrid origin of genetic caste determination in harvester ants , 2003, Nature.

[35]  L. Passera La ponte d'œufs préorientés chez la fourmiPheidole pallidula (Nyl.) (Hymenoptera-Formicidae) , 1980, Insectes Sociaux.

[36]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Genetic basis for queen–worker dimorphism in a social insect , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Steven W. Rissing,et al.  Extreme genetic differences between queens and workers in hybridizing Pogonomyrmex harvester ants , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  W. Tschinkel,et al.  The sociometry and sociogenesis of reproduction in the Florida harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius , 2006, Journal of insect science.

[39]  E. Wilson,et al.  Caste and ecology in the social insects. , 1979, Monographs in population biology.

[40]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Power over reproduction in social hymenoptera. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[41]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  The development of an ant colony's foraging range , 1995, Animal Behaviour.