Evolution And Revolution: A Quantum View Of Structural Change In Organizations

There may be hidden costs in making prompt incremental and piecemeal changes to organizational structure to cope with a new strategy or environment. We shall argue that changeless stable intervals punctuated by infrequent but revolutionary periods of ‘quantum’or multifaceted structural change may sometimes be the most economical strategy. Incremental structural changes may create severe and costly disharmonies as they destroy an integral structural configuration. These costs might outweigh the benefits of adapting structure to changes in strategy and environment. Because such costs may be high it might be necessary to delay changing until they can be justified. Such delays can require subsequent revolutionary structural changes. The applicability of this view of change for different contexts will be discussed.

[1]  D. Pugh.  An Empirical Taxonomy of Structures of Work Organizations. , 1969 .

[2]  Danny Miller,et al.  TOWARD A NEW CONTINGENCY APPROACH: THE SEARCH FOR ORGANIZATIONAL GESTALTS , 1981 .

[3]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  Archetypes of Strategy Formulation , 1978 .

[4]  B. McKelvey.  Organizational Systematics: Taxonomic Lessons from Biology , 1978 .

[5]  A. Stinchcombe.  Stratification and Organization: Bureaucratic and craft administration of production: a comparative study , 1959 .

[6]  D. Pugh,et al.  Dimensions of Organization Structure , 1968 .

[7]  Richard A. Peterson,et al.  Entrepreneurship in Organizations: Evidence from the Popular Music Industry , 1971 .

[8]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  A Framework For Organization Assessment , 1976 .

[9]  Danny Miller,et al.  Archetypes of Organizational Transition. , 1980 .

[10]  C. Lindblom.  THE SCIENCE OF MUDDLING THROUGH , 1959 .

[11]  Orion F. White.  The Dialectical Organization: An Alternative to Bureaucracy , 1969 .

[12]  Charles Perrow,et al.  The Reluctant Organization and the Aggressive Environment , 1965 .

[13]  Samuel Yitzhak,et al.  A Multidimensional Approach Toward a Typology of Bureaucracy. , 1970 .

[14]  P. Nystrom,et al.  Camping on Seesaws: Prescriptions for a Self-Designing Organization , 1976 .

[15]  T. Parsons.  SUGGESTIONS FOR A SOCIALOGICAL APPROCH TO THE THEORY OF ORGANIZATIONS , 1956 .

[16]  Patrick R. Pinto,et al.  A cluster analytic approach to the study of organizations , 1972 .

[17]  E. Carter.  The Behavioral Theory of the Firm and Top-Level Corporate Decisions , 1971 .

[18]  T. J. Cartwright,et al.  Problems, Solutions and Strategies: A Contribution to the Theory and Practice of Planning , 1973 .

[19]  M. Segal.  Organization and Environment: A Typology of Adaptability and Structure , 1974 .

[20]  Danny Miller,et al.  Momentum and Revolution in Organizational Adaptation , 1980 .

[21]  Pradip N. Khandwalla,et al.  Viable and Effective Organizational Designs of Firms , 1973 .

[22]  R. Normann,et al.  Organizational Innovativeness: Product Variation and Reorientation , 1971 .

[23]  Richard H. Day,et al.  How to Co-operate in Business without Really Trying: A Learning Model of Decentralized Decision Making , 1968, Journal of Political Economy.

[24]  B. Clark,et al.  The Organizational Saga in Higher Education. , 1972 .

[25]  Pradip N. Khandwalla,et al.  Environment and Its Impact on the Organization , 1972 .

[26]  Danny Miller,et al.  Structural Change and Performance: Quantum Versus Piecemeal-Incremental Approaches , 1982 .

[27]  A. Wildavsky.  The Self-Evaluating Organization , 1972 .