The world-wide failure exercise: Its origin, concept and content

Publisher Summary This chapter presents an investigation into the status of polymer composite failure theories. It provides a historical context for the origin of the study and also provides a detailed account of the methodology employed by the organizers to attain an impartial, independent, and broad ranging assessment of the leading failure theories. The study is known within the composites community as the “World-Wide Failure Exercise” (WWFE) and in some circles, the “Failure Olympics”. The origin of the WWFE can be traced to an “experts meeting” held at St Albans (UK) in 1991, on the subject of “Failure of Polymeric Composites and Structures: Mechanisms and Criteria for the Prediction of Performance”. The chapter includes a comprehensive description of the process by which the failure theories are selected, a brief description of the failure theories, the data and instructions supplied to the contributors, and the chronology of the key milestones. It evaluates the current level of maturity of theories for predicting the failure response of fiber reinforced plastic (FRP) laminates, minimizing the knowledge gap between theoreticians and design practitioners in this field, and stimulating the composites community into providing design engineers with more robust and accurate failure prediction methods and the confidence to use them. The chapter compares the 19 theories featured within the study and the overall performance of the theories.

[1]  L. J. Hart-Smith,et al.  Predictions of a generalized maximum-shear-stress failure criterion for certain fibrous composite laminates , 1998 .

[2]  Andrew C. Hansen,et al.  Composite laminate failure analysis using multicontinuum theory , 2004 .

[3]  M. Uemura,et al.  Probabilistic Burst Strength of Filament-Wound Cylinders Under Internal Pressure , 1981 .

[4]  Isaac M Daniel,et al.  Composite Materials: Testing and Design , 1982 .

[5]  L. J. Hart-Smith,et al.  Comparison between theories and test data concerning the strength of various fibre–polymer composites , 2002 .

[6]  L. J. Hart-Smith,et al.  Predictions of the original and truncated maximum-strain failure models for certain fibrous composite laminates , 1998 .

[7]  John G. Michopoulos,et al.  Characterization of strain-induced damage in composites based on the dissipated energy density Part III. General material constitutive relation , 1995 .

[8]  Zvi Hashin,et al.  Failure Modes of Angle Ply Laminates , 1975 .

[9]  Andrew C. Hansen,et al.  A comparison of multicontinuum theory based failure simulation with experimental results , 2004 .

[10]  E. C. Edge,et al.  A comparison of theory and experiment for the stress-based Grant-Sanders method , 2002 .

[11]  Stephen R Reid,et al.  A continuum damage model for transverse matrix cracking in laminated fibre–reinforced composites , 1998, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[12]  H. Schürmann,et al.  FAILURE ANALYSIS OF FRP LAMINATES BY MEANS OF PHYSICALLY BASED PHENOMENOLOGICAL MODELS , 1998 .

[13]  C. Sun,et al.  Prediction of failure envelopes and stress/strain behaviour of composite laminates 1 This article re , 1998 .

[14]  P. Tang A Multiaxial Failure Criterion for Composites , 1989 .

[15]  G. Eckold,et al.  FAILURE CRITERIA FOR USE IN THE DESIGN ENVIRONMENT 1 This article represents the author's contributi , 1998 .

[16]  Levon Minnetyan,et al.  Prediction of composite laminate fracture: micromechanics and progressive fracture , 1998 .

[17]  R. Cuntze,et al.  The predictive capability of failure mode concept-based strength criteria for multi-directional laminates—part B , 2004 .

[18]  A. Rotem,et al.  The Rotem failure criterion: theory and practice , 2002 .

[19]  Tarunjit S. Butalia,et al.  A strain-energy based failure criterion for non-linear analysis of composite laminates subjected to biaxial loading , 1998 .

[20]  Tarunjit S. Butalia,et al.  A strain-energy-based non-linear failure criterion: comparison of numerical predictions and experimental observations for symmetric composite laminates , 2002 .

[21]  James F. Newill,et al.  Predicting the nonlinear response and progressive failure of composite laminates , 2004 .

[22]  Stephen W. Tsai,et al.  A PROGRESSIVE QUADRATIC FAILURE CRITERION FOR A LAMINATE 1 This article represents the authors' cont , 1998 .

[23]  Zheng-Ming Huang,et al.  Correlation of the bridging model predictions of the biaxial failure strengths of fibrous laminates with experiments , 2004 .

[24]  S. Soni,et al.  A new look at commonly used failure theories in composite laminates , 1983 .

[25]  John G. Michopoulos,et al.  Characterization of strain-induced damage in composites based on the dissipated energy density part I. Basic scheme and formulation , 1995 .

[26]  Ramesh Talreja,et al.  A continuum mechanics characterization of damage in composite materials , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[27]  Z. Hashin Failure Criteria for Unidirectional Fiber Composites , 1980 .

[28]  Ludmilla P. Tairova,et al.  The strength of multilayered composites under a plane-stress state , 1998 .

[29]  Zvi Hashin,et al.  Finite thermoelastic fracture criterion with application to laminate cracking analysis , 1996 .

[30]  P. D. Soden,et al.  Biaxial test results for strength and deformation of a range of E-glass and carbon fibre reinforced composite laminates: failure exercise benchmark data , 2002 .

[31]  J. Greenwood German work on grp design , 1977 .

[32]  S. Swanson,et al.  Progressive Failure in Carbon/Epoxy Laminates Under Biaxial Stress , 1987 .

[33]  Stephen W. Tsai,et al.  A progressive quadratic failure criterion, part B , 2002 .

[34]  John G. Michopoulos,et al.  Characterization of strain-induced damage in composites based on the dissipated energy density part II. Composite specimens and naval structures , 1995 .

[35]  Zheng-Ming Huang,et al.  A bridging model prediction of the ultimate strength of composite laminates subjected to biaxial loads , 2004 .

[36]  James F. Newill,et al.  Predicting the Nonlinear Response and Failure of Composite Laminates: Correlation With Experimental Results , 2004 .

[37]  E. C. Edge Stress-based Grant-Sanders method for predicting failure of composite laminates , 1998 .

[38]  Levon Minnetyan,et al.  Application of progressive fracture analysis for predicting failure envelopes and stress–strain behaviors of composite laminates: a comparison with experimental results , 2002 .

[39]  P. D. Soden,et al.  Lamina properties, lay-up configurations and loading conditions for a range of fibre-reinforced composite laminates , 1998 .

[40]  L. J. Hart-Smith,et al.  Expanding the capabilities of the Ten-Percent Rule for predicting the strength of fibre–polymer composites , 2002 .

[41]  A. Rotem,et al.  PREDICTION OF LAMINATE FAILURE WITH THE ROTEM FAILURE CRITERION 1 This article represents the author , 1998 .

[42]  L. McCartney,et al.  PREDICTING TRANSVERSE CRACK FORMATION IN CROSS-PLY LAMINATES 1 This article represents the author's , 1998 .