Non-rigid Image Registration with Equally Weighted Assimilated Surface Constraint

An important research problem in image-guided radiation therapy is how to accurately register daily onboard Cone-beam CT (CBCT) images to higher quality pretreatment fan-beam CT (FBCT) images. Assuming the organ segmentations are both available on CBCT and FBCT images, methods have been proposed to use them to help the intensity-driven image registration. Due to the low contrast between soft-tissue structures exhibited in CBCT, the interobserver contouring variability (expressed as standard deviation) can be as large as 2-3 mm and varies systematically with organ, and relative location on each organ surface. Therefore the inclusion of the segmentations into registration may degrade registration accuracy. To address this issue we propose a surface assimilation method that estimates a new surface from the manual segmentation from a priori organ shape knowledge and the interobserver segmentation error. Our experiment results show the proposed method improves registration accuracy compared to previous methods.

[1]  Peter Craven,et al.  Smoothing noisy data with spline functions , 1978 .

[2]  Chao Lu,et al.  An integrated approach to segmentation and nonrigid registration for application in image-guided pelvic radiotherapy , 2011, Medical Image Anal..

[3]  Jeffrey Williamson,et al.  Development of a population-based model of surface segmentation uncertainties for uncertainty-weighted deformable image registrations. , 2010, Medical physics.

[4]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  G. Wahba.  Smoothing noisy data with spline functions , 1975 .

[6]  Christopher J. Taylor,et al.  Statistical models of shape - optimisation and evaluation , 2008 .

[7]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[8]  Jay B. West,et al.  Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Dimitris N. Metaxas,et al.  A 3D global-to-local deformable mesh model based registration and anatomy-constrained segmentation method for image guided prostate radiotherapy. , 2010, Medical physics.

[10]  G. Wahba.  Spline models for observational data , 1990 .

[11]  Michael B Sharpe,et al.  Image-guided radiotherapy: rationale, benefits, and limitations. , 2006, The Lancet. Oncology.

[12]  Zhe Chen,et al.  Constrained non-rigid registration for use in image-guided adaptive radiotherapy , 2009, Medical Image Anal..

[13]  M W Vannier,et al.  Image-based dose planning of intracavitary brachytherapy: registration of serial-imaging studies using deformable anatomic templates. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  Yuedong Wang,et al.  Smoothing Splines: Methods and Applications , 2011 .

[15]  M van Herk,et al.  A general methodology for three-dimensional analysis of variation in target volume delineation. , 1999, Medical physics.

[16]  Paul Keall,et al.  Evaluation of 4-dimensional computed tomography to 4-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography deformable image registration for lung cancer adaptive radiation therapy. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  Eugenia Kalnay,et al.  Atmospheric Modeling, Data Assimilation and Predictability , 2002 .

[18]  Cheng Zhang,et al.  SUPIR: Surface Uncertainty-Penalized, Non-rigid Image Registration for Pelvic CT Imaging , 2012, WBIR.

[19]  William M. Wells,et al.  Bayesian characterization of uncertainty in intra-subject non-rigid registration , 2013, Medical Image Anal..

[20]  Bernd Fischer,et al.  Biomedical Image Registration, 4th International Workshop, WBIR 2010, Lübeck, Germany, July 11-13, 2010. Proceedings , 2010, Workshop on Biomedical Image Registration.