Measurable Residual Disease Response and Prognosis in Treatment-Naïve Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Venetoclax and Azacitidine

PURPOSE There is limited evidence on the clinical utility of monitoring measurable residual disease (MRD) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with lower-intensity therapy. Herein, we explored the outcomes of patients treated with venetoclax and azacitidine who achieved composite complete remission (CRc; complete remission + complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery) and MRD < 10–3 in the VIALE-A trial. METHODS The patients included in this report were treated with venetoclax and azacitidine. Bone marrow aspirate samples for multiparametric flow cytometry assessments were collected for central analysis at baseline, end of cycle 1, and every three cycles thereafter. MRD-negative response was defined as < 1 residual blast per 1,000 leukocytes (< 10–3 or 0.1%) with an estimated analytic sensitivity of 0.0037%-0.0027%. CRc, duration of remission (DoR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed. A multivariate Cox regression analysis identified prognostic factors associated with OS. RESULTS One hundred sixty-four of one hundred ninety (86%) patients with CRc were evaluable for MRD. MRD < 10–3 was achieved by 67 of 164 (41%), and 97 of 164 (59%) had MRD ≥ 10–3. The median DoR, EFS, and OS were not reached in patients with CRc and MRD < 10–3, and the 12-month estimates for DoR, EFS, and OS in this group were 81.2%, 83.2%, and 94.0%. Among patients with CRc and MRD ≥ 10–3, the median DoR, EFS, and OS were 9.7, 10.6, and 18.7 months. Multivariate analysis showed that CRc with MRD < 10–3 was a strong predictor of OS (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.285; 95% CI, 0.159 to 0.510; P < .001). CONCLUSION Patients who achieved CRc and MRD < 10–3 with venetoclax and azacitidine had longer DoR, EFS, and OS, than responding patients with MRD ≥ 10–3. CRc and MRD<10-3 with venetoclax and azacitidine had longer DoR, EFS, and OS, than responding patients with MRD ≥10-3

[1]  M. Konopleva,et al.  Prognostic value of measurable residual disease after venetoclax and decitabine in acute myeloid leukemia. , 2020, Blood advances.

[2]  A. Letai,et al.  Azacitidine and Venetoclax in Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  G. Clark,et al.  Measurable Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Using Flow Cytometry: A Review of Where We Are and Where We Are Going , 2020, Journal of clinical medicine.

[4]  Markus G. Manz,et al.  Molecular Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Torsten Haferlach,et al.  Minimal/measurable residual disease in AML: a consensus document from the European LeukemiaNet MRD Working Party. , 2018, Blood.

[6]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Achievement of a negative minimal residual disease state after hypomethylating agent therapy in older patients with AML reduces the risk of relapse , 2018, Leukemia.

[7]  Bob Löwenberg,et al.  Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel. , 2017, Blood.

[8]  F. Lo‐Coco,et al.  Minimal residual disease negativity in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia may indicate different postremission strategies than in younger patients , 2015, Annals of Hematology.

[9]  Robert K Hills,et al.  Prognostic relevance of treatment response measured by flow cytometric residual disease detection in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  Bob Löwenberg,et al.  High prognostic impact of flow cytometric minimal residual disease detection in acute myeloid leukemia: data from the HOVON/SAKK AML 42A study. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  D. Grimwade,et al.  Development of minimal residual disease-directed therapy in acute myeloid leukemia. , 2008, Seminars in oncology.

[12]  H. Gundacker,et al.  Age and acute myeloid leukemia. , 2006, Blood.

[13]  Susan O'Brien,et al.  Results of intensive chemotherapy in 998 patients age 65 years or older with acute myeloid leukemia or high‐risk myelodysplastic syndrome: , 2006, Cancer.

[14]  E. Estey,et al.  Results of Intensive Chemotherapy in 998 Patients Aged 65 Years or Older with Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome - Predictive Prognostic Models for Outcome. , 2005 .

[15]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.