Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances in the General Dental Service in Scotland.

The records of 128 subjects treated by orthodontic specialists with fixed appliances in the General Dental Service in Scotland were randomly selected from the Scottish Dental Practice Board for analysis. The results of the study revealed that: (1) Mean post-treatment Peer Assessment Rating was 7.8 +/- 4.6 PAR points. (2) Mean reduction in PAR score was 14.9 +/- 10.6 PAR points. (3) Mean percentage reduction in PAR was 59 per cent. (4) Twenty-eight per cent of the cases were 'greatly improved', 15 per cent of the cases were made 'worse or no different'. (5) Median duration of treatment was 15 months, with a range of 2-41 months. (6) Multiple regression analysis showed that 82 per cent of the variability of PAR change could be predicted by the pretreatment PAR scores and the number of arches treated. Post-treatment PAR scores and duration of treatment could not be predicted with adequate reliability. It was concluded that although about 75 per cent of the cases were treated to at least acceptable alignment and occlusion, the modest average percentage reduction in PAR score could be explained by the low average initial PAR score and the borderline need for treatment in many cases.

[1]  P. Brook,et al.  The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. , 1989, European journal of orthodontics.

[2]  N A Fox,et al.  The first 100 cases: a personal audit of orthodontic treatment assessed by the PAR (peer assessment rating) index , 1993, British Dental Journal.

[3]  J. Clark,et al.  Practical Application of the PAR Index: An Illustrative Comparison of the Outcome of Treatment Using Two Fixed Appliance Techniques , 1996, British journal of orthodontics.

[4]  S. Wei,et al.  Assessing treatment effectiveness of removable and fixed orthodontic appliances with the occlusal index. , 1990, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[5]  S. Richmond,et al.  Assessment of General Dental Services Orthodontic Standards: The Dental Practice Board's Gradings Compared to PAR and IOTN , 1996, British journal of orthodontics.

[6]  P. Wisth,et al.  Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index. , 1997, European journal of orthodontics.

[7]  R. Berg,et al.  Evaluation of orthodontic treatment results. , 1981, European journal of orthodontics.

[8]  J. Clark,et al.  An Investigation of Treatment Provided in the General Dental Service for Patients with Class II Division 1 Malocclusions , 1984, British journal of orthodontics.

[9]  S. Richmond,et al.  The Provision of Orthodontic Care in the General Dental Services of England and Wales: Extraction Patterns, Treatment Duration, Appliance Types and Standards , 1993, British journal of orthodontics.

[10]  S. Richmond,et al.  Factors affecting the outcome of orthodontic treatment within the general dental service. , 1997, British journal of orthodontics.

[11]  S. Richmond Personal Audit in Orthodontics , 1993, British journal of orthodontics.

[12]  S. Springate,et al.  Specialist orthodontics in the General Dental Service , 1996, British Dental Journal.

[13]  P. Vig,et al.  The Occlusal Index Used to Assess Orthodontic Treatment , 1975, British journal of orthodontics.

[14]  S Richmond,et al.  The PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards. , 1992, European journal of orthodontics.

[15]  J. Clark,et al.  Orthodontic Treatment in the General Dental Service Assessed by the Occlusal Index , 1983, British journal of orthodontics.

[16]  B. Thilander,et al.  An evaluation of the duration and the results of orthodontic treatment. , 1973, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[17]  J. McColl,et al.  Factors influencing the outcome and duration of removable appliance treatment. , 1994, European journal of orthodontics.

[18]  W. Shaw,et al.  The Use of Occlusal Indices in Assessing the Provision of Orthodontic Treatment by the Hospital Orthodontic Service of England and Wales , 1993, British journal of orthodontics.

[19]  J. McColl,et al.  Factors Associated with the Standard and Duration of Orthodontic Treatment , 1996, British journal of orthodontics.

[20]  S. Richmond,et al.  Orthodontic treatment standards in Norway. , 1993, European journal of orthodontics.

[21]  S. Richmond,et al.  A critical assessment of orthodontic standards in England and Wales (1990–1991) in relation to changes in prior approval , 1996, British journal of orthodontics.

[22]  J H McColl,et al.  Use of the PAR Index in Assessing the Effectiveness of Removable Orthodontic Appliances , 1993, British journal of orthodontics.

[23]  R. Berg Post-retention analysis of treatment problems and failures in 264 consecutively treated cases. , 1979, European journal of orthodontics.