Tumor heterogeneity of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) mutations in invasive bladder cancer: implications for perioperative anti-FGFR3 treatment.

BACKGROUND Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) is an actionable target in bladder cancer. Preclinical studies show that anti-FGFR3 treatment slows down tumor growth, suggesting that this tyrosine kinase receptor is a candidate for personalized bladder cancer treatment, particularly in patients with mutated FGFR3. We addressed tumor heterogeneity in a large multicenter, multi-laboratory study, as this may have significant impact on therapeutic response. PATIENTS AND METHODS We evaluated possible FGFR3 heterogeneity by the PCR-SNaPshot method in the superficial and deep compartments of tumors obtained by transurethral resection (TUR, n = 61) and in radical cystectomy (RC, n = 614) specimens and corresponding cancer-positive lymph nodes (LN+, n = 201). RESULTS We found FGFR3 mutations in 13/34 (38%) T1 and 8/27 (30%) ≥T2-TUR samples, with 100% concordance between superficial and deeper parts in T1-TUR samples. Of eight FGFR3 mutant ≥T2-TUR samples, only 4 (50%) displayed the mutation in the deeper part. We found 67/614 (11%) FGFR3 mutations in RC specimens. FGFR3 mutation was associated with pN0 (P < 0.001) at RC. In 10/201 (5%) LN+, an FGFR3 mutation was found, all concordant with the corresponding RC specimen. In the remaining 191 cases, RC and LN+ were both wild type. CONCLUSIONS FGFR3 mutation status seems promising to guide decision-making on adjuvant anti-FGFR3 therapy as it appeared homogeneous in RC and LN+. Based on the results of TUR, the deep part of the tumor needs to be assessed if neoadjuvant anti-FGFR3 treatment is considered. We conclude that studies on the heterogeneity of actionable molecular targets should precede clinical trials with these drugs in the perioperative setting.

[1]  J. Soria,et al.  Novel therapeutic targets in advanced urothelial carcinoma. , 2016, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[2]  F. Real,et al.  Intratumour heterogeneity in urologic cancers: from molecular evidence to clinical implications. , 2015, European urology.

[3]  Yair Lotan,et al.  Multicenter assessment of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. , 2015, European urology.

[4]  L. Collette,et al.  Immediate versus deferred chemotherapy after radical cystectomy in patients with pT3-pT4 or N+ M0 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (EORTC 30994): an intergroup, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[5]  S. Lerner Targeted therapies for metastatic bladder cancer. , 2015, The Journal of urology.

[6]  M. Knowles,et al.  FGFR3 expression in primary invasive bladder cancers and matched lymph node metastases. , 2015, The Journal of urology.

[7]  J. Chin,et al.  Dovitinib: rationale, preclinical and early clinical data in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder , 2014, Expert opinion on investigational drugs.

[8]  H. G. van der Poel,et al.  Molecular markers for urothelial bladder cancer prognosis: toward implementation in clinical practice. , 2014, Urologic oncology.

[9]  C. Cordon-Cardo,et al.  Bladder cancers arise from distinct urothelial sub-populations , 2014, Nature Cell Biology.

[10]  B. Gallie,et al.  FGFR3 mutations, but not FGFR3 expression and FGFR3 copy-number variations, are associated with favourable non-muscle invasive bladder cancer , 2014, Virchows Archiv.

[11]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular characterization of urothelial bladder carcinoma , 2014, Nature.

[12]  The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network,et al.  Comprehensive molecular characterization of urothelial bladder carcinoma , 2014, Nature.

[13]  C. Sander,et al.  Prevalence and co-occurrence of actionable genomic alterations in high-grade bladder cancer. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  M. Knowles,et al.  Oncogenic FGFR3 gene fusions in bladder cancer , 2012, Human molecular genetics.

[15]  Y. Allory,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between FGFR3 and TP53 Mutations in Bladder Cancer , 2012, PloS one.

[16]  M. Parmar,et al.  International phase III trial assessing neoadjuvant cisplatin, methotrexate, and vinblastine chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: long-term results of the BA06 30894 trial. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  C. Compton,et al.  AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th edition. Colon and rectum , 2010 .

[18]  M. Ghoneim,et al.  Radical cystectomy for carcinoma of the bladder: 2,720 consecutive cases 5 years later. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[19]  M. Knowles,et al.  FGFR3 protein expression and its relationship to mutation status and prognostic variables in bladder cancer , 2007, The Journal of pathology.

[20]  E. Zwarthoff,et al.  A Simple and Fast Method for the Simultaneous Detection of Nine Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3 Mutations in Bladder Cancer and Voided Urine , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[21]  T. H. van der Kwast,et al.  Molecular grading of urothelial cell carcinoma with fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 and MIB-1 is superior to pathologic grade for the prediction of clinical outcome. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  C. Compton,et al.  AJCC Cancer Staging Manual , 2002, Springer New York.

[23]  S. Groshen,et al.  Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  D. Chopin,et al.  Frequent activating mutations of FGFR3 in human bladder and cervix carcinomas , 1999, Nature Genetics.