Revisiting the Perception of Upside-Down Faces

In two experiments, the effect of orientation on face perception was assessed. Using a scale from 1 (normal) to 7 (bizarre), participants rated normal, unaltered faces and faces in which changes had been made to spatial-relational properties (eyes and mouth inverted or relative position of the eyes and mouth altered) or to component properties (eyes whitened and teeth blackened). For unaltered and component-distortion faces, bizarreness ratings increased linearly as orientation increased from 0° to 180°. For spatial-distortion faces, a discontinuity in the function relating orientation and bizarreness was in evidence between 90° and 120°. The results provide support for the view that there is a qualitative difference in the processing of upright and inverted faces due to the disproportionate effect of inversion on the encoding of spatial-relational information.

[1]  S. Carey,et al.  From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces. , 1977, Science.

[2]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Inversion and processing of component and spatial–relational information in faces. , 1996 .

[3]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information in faces. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  M. Farah Is face recognition ‘special’? Evidence from neuropsychology , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[5]  T. Parks,et al.  Thatcher and the Cheshire Cat: Context and the Processing of Facial Features , 1985, Perception.

[6]  Sam S. Rakover,et al.  Facial inversion effects: Parts and whole relationship , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  T. Valentine The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology a Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[10]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles , 1988 .

[11]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Inversion and Configuration of Faces , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  T. Valentine Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. , 1988, British journal of psychology.

[13]  P. Thompson,et al.  Margaret Thatcher: A New Illusion , 1980, Perception.

[14]  G. Winocur,et al.  What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  V. Bruce,et al.  Mental rotation of faces , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[16]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  What's lost in inverted faces? , 1993, Cognition.