Persistent Donor Cell Gene Expression among Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Contributes to Differences with Human Embryonic Stem Cells

Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) generated by de-differentiation of adult somatic cells offer potential solutions for the ethical issues surrounding human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), as well as their immunologic rejection after cellular transplantation. However, although hiPSCs have been described as “embryonic stem cell-like”, these cells have a distinct gene expression pattern compared to hESCs, making incomplete reprogramming a potential pitfall. It is unclear to what degree the difference in tissue of origin may contribute to these gene expression differences. To answer these important questions, a careful transcriptional profiling analysis is necessary to investigate the exact reprogramming state of hiPSCs, as well as analysis of the impression, if any, of the tissue of origin on the resulting hiPSCs. In this study, we compare the gene profiles of hiPSCs derived from fetal fibroblasts, neonatal fibroblasts, adipose stem cells, and keratinocytes to their corresponding donor cells and hESCs. Our analysis elucidates the overall degree of reprogramming within each hiPSC line, as well as the “distance” between each hiPSC line and its donor cell. We further identify genes that have a similar mode of regulation in hiPSCs and their corresponding donor cells compared to hESCs, allowing us to specify core sets of donor genes that continue to be expressed in each hiPSC line. We report that residual gene expression of the donor cell type contributes significantly to the differences among hiPSCs and hESCs, and adds to the incompleteness in reprogramming. Specifically, our analysis reveals that fetal fibroblast-derived hiPSCs are closer to hESCs, followed by adipose, neonatal fibroblast, and keratinocyte-derived hiPSCs.

[1]  S. Cole,et al.  Sequences Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Free of Vector and Transgene , 2012 .

[2]  M. Longaker,et al.  Human iPS cell-based therapy: Considerations before clinical applications , 2010, Cell cycle.

[3]  D. Sipp Gold standards in the diamond age: the commodification of pluripotency. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[4]  J. Utikal,et al.  Sox2 is dispensable for the reprogramming of melanocytes and melanoma cells into induced pluripotent stem cells , 2009, Journal of Cell Science.

[5]  Fred H. Gage,et al.  Transcriptional Signature and Memory Retention of Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells , 2009, PloS one.

[6]  Deepak M. Gupta,et al.  Feeder-free derivation of induced pluripotent stem cells from adult human adipose stem cells , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Hideyuki Okano,et al.  Variation in the safety of induced pluripotent stem cell lines , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[8]  Mike J. Mason,et al.  Induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells are distinguished by gene expression signatures. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[9]  Robert Lanza,et al.  Generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells by direct delivery of reprogramming proteins. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[10]  G. Daley,et al.  Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from human blood. , 2009, Blood.

[11]  R. Stewart,et al.  Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Free of Vector and Transgene Sequences , 2009, Science.

[12]  Sui Huang Reprogramming cell fates: reconciling rarity with robustness , 2009, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[13]  Shinya Yamanaka,et al.  A Fresh Look at iPS Cells , 2009, Cell.

[14]  K. Hochedlinger,et al.  Guidelines and techniques for the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[15]  A. Connolly,et al.  In vivo imaging of embryonic stem cells reveals patterns of survival and immune rejection following transplantation. , 2008, Stem cells and development.

[16]  T. Graf,et al.  Heterogeneity of embryonic and adult stem cells. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[17]  A. Consiglio,et al.  Efficient and rapid generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from human keratinocytes , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg,et al.  Immunosuppressive therapy mitigates immunological rejection of human embryonic stem cell xenografts , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Concepcion R. Nierras,et al.  The promise of human induced pluripotent stem cells for research and therapy , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[20]  Kristi A. Hohenstein,et al.  Regulation of Self‐Renewal and Pluripotency by Sox2 in Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2008, Stem cells.

[21]  Bindiya Patel,et al.  Adipose-derived stem cells: isolation, expansion and differentiation. , 2008, Methods.

[22]  Paul H Lerou,et al.  Generation of human-induced pluripotent stem cells , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[23]  P. Brundin,et al.  Critical issues of clinical human embryonic stem cell therapy for brain repair , 2008, Trends in Neurosciences.

[24]  K. Plath,et al.  Generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells from dermal fibroblasts , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  B. Thiers Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Human Fibroblasts by Defined Factors , 2008 .

[26]  Shulan Tian,et al.  Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human Somatic Cells , 2007, Science.

[27]  T. Ichisaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Human Fibroblasts by Defined Factors , 2007, Cell.

[28]  Elaine Fuchs,et al.  Scratching the surface of skin development , 2007, Nature.

[29]  Dennis B. Troup,et al.  NCBI GEO: mining tens of millions of expression profiles—database and tools update , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[30]  N. Mongan,et al.  The putative human stem cell marker, Rex‐1 (Zfp42): Structural classification and expression in normal human epithelial and carcinoma cell cultures , 2006, Molecular carcinogenesis.

[31]  J. Miyazaki,et al.  Klf4 Cooperates with Oct3/4 and Sox2 To Activate the Lefty1 Core Promoter in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[32]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors , 2006, Cell.

[33]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  Anatomic Demarcation by Positional Variation in Fibroblast Gene Expression Programs , 2006, PLoS genetics.

[34]  Björn Carlsson,et al.  The FASEB Journal • FJ Express Full-Length Article Separation of human adipocytes by size: hypertrophic fat , 2022 .

[35]  Hannah H. Chang,et al.  Multistable and multistep dynamics in neutrophil differentiation , 2006, BMC Cell Biology.

[36]  John D. Storey,et al.  A network-based analysis of systemic inflammation in humans , 2005, Nature.

[37]  P. Arner,et al.  Changes in Adipose Tissue Gene Expression with Energy-restricted Diets in Obese Women , 2022 .

[38]  P. Svensson,et al.  A microarray search for genes predominantly expressed in human omental adipocytes: adipose tissue as a major production site of serum amyloid A. , 2005, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[39]  M. Mattson,et al.  Cellular lifespan and senescence signaling in embryonic stem cells , 2004, Aging cell.

[40]  A. Murdoch,et al.  Derivation, growth and applications of human embryonic stem cells. , 2004, Reproduction.

[41]  Jay Snoddy,et al.  Gene expression profiling in human preadipocytes and adipocytes by microarray analysis. , 2004, The Journal of nutrition.

[42]  M. Tomic-Canic,et al.  Transcriptional profiling of epidermal keratinocytes: comparison of genes expressed in skin, cultured keratinocytes, and reconstituted epidermis, using large DNA microarrays. , 2003, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[43]  Min Zhu,et al.  Human adipose tissue is a source of multipotent stem cells. , 2002, Molecular biology of the cell.

[44]  Francis D. Gibbons,et al.  Judging the quality of gene expression-based clustering methods using gene annotation. , 2002, Genome research.

[45]  David Botstein,et al.  Diversity, topographic differentiation, and positional memory in human fibroblasts , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  Konan Peck,et al.  Changes in gene expression profiles of human fibroblasts in response to sodium arsenite treatment. , 2002, Carcinogenesis.

[47]  L. Brown,et al.  Differential expression and regulation of extracellular matrix‐associated genes in fetal and neonatal fibroblasts , 2001, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[48]  D. Botstein,et al.  Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  C. Waddington,et al.  The strategy of the genes , 1957 .

[50]  C. Waddington The strategy of the genes , 1957 .