Refining Inquiry with Multi-Form Assessment: Formative and summative assessment functions for flexible inquiry

This paper describes the 5E+I/A inquiry model and reports a case study of one curricular enactment by a US fifth-grade classroom. A literature review establishes the model's conceptual adequacy with respect to longstanding research related to both the 5E inquiry model and multiple, incremental innovations of it. As a collective line of research, the review highlights a common emphasis on formative assessment, at times coupled either with differentiated instruction strategies or with activities that target the generalization of learning. The 5E+I/A model contributes a multi-level assessment strategy that balances formative and summative functions of multiple forms of assessment in order to support classroom participation while still attending to individual achievement. The case report documents the enactment of a weeklong 5E+I/A curricular design as a preliminary account of the model's empirical adequacy. A descriptive and analytical narrative illustrates variable ways that multi-level assessment makes student thinking visible and pedagogical decision-making more powerful. In light of both, it also documents productive adaptations to a flexible curricular design and considers future research to advance this collective line of inquiry.

[1]  Peter Aubusson,et al.  A Trial of the Five Es: A Referent Model for Constructivist Teaching and Learning , 2003 .

[2]  J. Marshall,et al.  4E × 2 Instructional Model: Uniting Three Learning Constructs to Improve Praxis in Science and Mathematics Classrooms , 2009 .

[3]  Steven J. Zuiker,et al.  Educational virtual environments as a lens for understanding both precise repeatability and specific variation in learning ecologies , 2012, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[4]  The Impact of the 6E Model in a Third Grade Science Classroom , 2011 .

[5]  R. Shavelson,et al.  On the evaluation of systemic science education reform: Searching for instructional sensitivity , 2002 .

[6]  Ference Marton,et al.  Sameness and Difference in Transfer , 2006 .

[7]  Daniel T. Hickey,et al.  A new perspective for evaluating innovative science programs , 2003 .

[8]  J. Gilbert On the Nature of “Context” in Chemical Education , 2006 .

[9]  Shirley J. Magnusson,et al.  Dynamic Science Assessment: A New Approach for Investigating Conceptual Change , 1997 .

[10]  James W. Pellegrino,et al.  Addressing the "Two Disciplines" Problem: Linking Theories of Cognition and Learning With Assessment and Instructional Practice , 1957 .

[11]  D. Ketelhut The Impact of Student Self-efficacy on Scientific Inquiry Skills: An Exploratory Investigation in River City, a Multi-user Virtual Environment , 2007 .

[12]  Paul W. Richardson The culture of education , 1996 .

[13]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  Science Education for the Future. , 1998 .

[14]  Liang Dong,et al.  A web-based collaboration environment for k-12 math and science teachers , 2009, 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.

[15]  Katerine Bielaczyc,et al.  Informing Design Research: Learning From Teachers' Designs of Social Infrastructure , 2013 .

[16]  Arthur Eisenkraft,et al.  Expanding the 5E Model. , 2003 .

[17]  Mary M. Rohrkemper,et al.  Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: A Vygotskian View , 1989 .

[18]  Michael Barnett,et al.  Designed curriculum and local culture: Acknowledging the primacy of classroom culture , 2003 .

[19]  Herbert D. Thier,et al.  A NEW LOOK AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SCIENCE, NEW TRENDS IN CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION SERIES. , 1967 .

[20]  R. Bybee,et al.  The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins and Effectiveness , 2006 .

[21]  E. Soloway,et al.  Creating Usable Innovations in Systemic Reform: Scaling Up Technology-Embedded Project-Based Science in Urban Schools , 2000 .

[22]  Angela Calabrese Barton,et al.  Teaching Science with Homeless Children: Pedagogy, Representation, and Identity. , 1998 .

[23]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  How do students make sense of science , 1993 .

[24]  Carol L. Smith,et al.  Using Conceptual Models to Facilitate Conceptual Change: The Case of Weight-Density Differentiation , 1992 .

[25]  Sombat Tayraukham,et al.  Effects of 7-E, KWL and Conventional Instruction on Analytical Thinking, Learning Achievement and Attitudes toward Chemistry Learning , 2009 .

[26]  Carol L. Smith,et al.  Teaching for Understanding: A Study of Students' Preinstruction Theories of Matter and a Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Approaches to Teaching About Matter and Density , 1997 .

[27]  S. Clegg Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again , 2002 .

[28]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice , 1995 .

[29]  Keith S. Taber,et al.  Chemistry lessons for universities?: a review of constructivist ideas , 2000 .

[30]  Caroline Gipps,et al.  Chapter 10: Socio-Cultural Aspects of Assessment , 1999 .

[31]  Miriam Gamoran Sherin,et al.  Fostering communities of teachers as learners: disciplinary perspectives , 2004 .

[32]  H. Farmer A new perspective. , 1988, The Journal of the Florida Medical Association.

[33]  W. Penuel,et al.  Organizing Research and Development at the Intersection of Learning, Implementation, and Design , 2011 .

[34]  A Learning Cycle for All Students. , 2011 .

[35]  Lloyd H. Barrow,et al.  A Brief History of Inquiry: From Dewey to Standards , 2006 .

[36]  Han Cai,et al.  On the Nature of Context , 2004 .

[37]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[38]  Samih Bayrakçeken The Effect of 5E Learning Model on Pre-Service Science Teachers' Achievement of Acids-Bases Subject , 2010 .

[39]  R. Stake The art of case study research , 1995 .

[40]  K. Squire From Content to Context: Videogames as Designed Experience , 2006 .

[41]  Daniel T. Hickey,et al.  Multilevel Assessment for Discourse, Understanding, and Achievement , 2012 .

[42]  Ron Tzur,et al.  Explicating the Teacher's Perspective From the Researchers' Perspectives: Generating Accounts of Mathematics Teachers' Practice , 1999 .

[43]  Hee-Sun Lee,et al.  Research towards an expanded understanding of inquiry science beyond one idealized standard , 2003 .

[44]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Inquiry in science education: International perspectives , 2004 .

[45]  D. Hickey,et al.  Engaged Participation: A Sociocultural Model of Motivation With Implications for Educational Assessment , 2005 .

[46]  Janet F. Carlson,et al.  The relative effects and equity of inquiry‐based and commonplace science teaching on students' knowledge, reasoning, and argumentation , 2009 .