Investigating Maturity of Lean Culture in Product Development Teams

Nowadays, many companies attempt to expand the lean concept from manufacturing to Product Development (PD). However, there are very few practical examples reporting how lean can be successfully applied outside the manufacturing floor. The benefits of lean can only be realized in PD once the concept is scaled to the business environment where it is employed. In this paper, we use a maturity framework for identifying gaps between current lean culture capabilities and those deemed necessary for competitive PD practices in the future. The general objective is to identify differences between companies as to how they assess capability gaps relating to lean within their operational context. A lean assessment framework using a continuous descriptive five-level maturity grid method has been used in the PD environments of nine companies. Focus has been placed on assessing characteristics associated with a lean culture in PD. The results show significant differences between the companies as to how they assess the gap between their current lean cultural capabilities and those deemed necessary in the future. Overall, the use of simple and visual communication means in PD activities is identified to provide the larger capability gap among the companies studied. In the other end of the scale, showing the smaller gap, we identified the perceived role of digital tools and technology in PD.

[1]  Monica Rossi,et al.  Lean product and process development , 2016 .

[2]  Kulwant S. Pawar,et al.  Measuring product development performance in manufacturing organisations , 2000 .

[3]  Torgeir Welo,et al.  Investigating Organizational Knowledge Transformation Capabilities in Integrated Manufacturing and Product Development Companies , 2018 .

[4]  Pär Åhlström,et al.  The difficult path to lean product development , 1996 .

[5]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  On customer value and improvement in product development processes , 2003 .

[6]  Mike Gregory,et al.  The use of maturity models/grids as a tool in assessing product development capability , 2002, IEEE International Engineering Management Conference.

[7]  Torgeir Welo,et al.  Beyond Waste Elimination: Assessing Lean Practices in Product Development , 2016 .

[8]  Donovan R. Hardenbrook,et al.  Ready, Set, Dominate: Implement Toyota's Set-Based Learning for Developing Products and Nobody Can Catch You! by Michael Kennedy, Kent Harmon, and Ed Minnock , 2009 .

[9]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  RECONCEPTUALIZING THE EFFECTS OF LEAN ON PRODUCTION COSTS WITH EVIDENCE FROM THE F-22 PROGRAM , 2009 .

[10]  Torgeir Welo,et al.  Knowledge based development practices in systems engineering companies: A comparative study , 2015, 2015 Annual IEEE Systems Conference (SysCon) Proceedings.

[11]  James P. Womack,et al.  Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation , 1996 .

[12]  Art Smalley,et al.  Understanding A3 Thinking: A Critical Component of Toyota's PDCA Management System , 2008 .

[13]  Badr Haque,et al.  Applying lean thinking to new product introduction , 2004 .

[14]  Deborah J. Nightingale,et al.  Development of a Lean Enterprise Transformation Maturity Model , 2002, Inf. Knowl. Syst. Manag..

[15]  P. Coughlan,et al.  Development of a technical innovation audit , 1996 .