Learner perceptions of reliance on captions in EFL multimedia listening comprehension

Instructional support has been widely discussed as a strategy to optimize student-learning experiences. This study examines instructional support within the context of a multimedia language-learning environment, with the predominant focus on learners’ perceptions of captioning support for listening comprehension. The study seeks to answer two questions: (1) do learners’ perceptions regarding dependence on captions match their actual reliance on captioning for listening comprehension? and (2) which learners’ perceptions are most influenced by proficiency: low-intermediate, intermediate, or high-intermediate? A total of 139 students from a high school English course in northern Taiwan, all accustomed to multimedia instruction that includes full captions, completed an English language proficiency test as well as a caption reliance test (CRT), and also provided their perceived degree of reliance on captions for English listening comprehension. The results show that overall perceived reliance was significantly related to actual reliance as assessed by the CRT. However, proficiency was also found to be a mitigating factor in the relationship: while low-intermediate level learners accurately perceived their reliance, no relation was found for either intermediate or high-intermediate learners, indicating that, at these levels, some learners may not accurately judge their reliance on captioning. Accordingly, the study offers pedagogical implications that captioning support, added or removed, based on learner self-reports, may not be inherently beneficial, as perceptions on the reliance of captioning may be inaccurate.

[1]  Abdolmajid Hayati,et al.  The effect of films with and without subtitles on listening comprehension of EFL learners , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[2]  Linda C. Jones,et al.  Supporting Listening Comprehension and Vocabulary Acquisition with Multimedia Annotations: The Students' Voice , 2013 .

[3]  Hao Jan Howard Chen,et al.  Developing and evaluating SynctoLearn, a fully automatic video and transcript synchronization tool for EFL learners , 2011 .

[4]  Larry Vandergrift Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research , 2007, Language Teaching.

[5]  Aubrey Neil Leveridge,et al.  Testing learner reliance on caption supports in second language listening comprehension multimedia environments , 2013, ReCALL.

[6]  Anthony Green,et al.  To show or not to show: The effects of item stems and answer options on performance on a multiple-choice listening comprehension test , 2008 .

[7]  Yi-Ching Pan,et al.  Test review: GEPT: General English Proficiency Test , 2008 .

[8]  Anita Jones Vogely Listening Comprehension Anxiety: Students' Reported Sources and Solutions , 1998 .

[9]  Elvis Wagner,et al.  Are they watching? Test-taker viewing behavior during an L2 video listening test , 2007 .

[10]  Gregory Taylor,et al.  Perceived Processing Strategies of Students Watching Captioned Video , 2005 .

[11]  Paul L. Markham,et al.  The effects of captioned television videotapes on the listening comprehension of beginning, intermediate, and advanced ESL students , 1989 .

[12]  Géry d'Ydewalle,et al.  Foreign-grammar acquisition while watching subtitled television programmes. , 2006, The British journal of educational psychology.

[13]  Patricia S. Koskinen,et al.  Captioned Television as Comprehensible Input: Effects of Incidental Word Learning from Context for Language Minority Students. , 1992 .

[14]  Trude Heift,et al.  Context-sensitive Help in CALL , 2006 .

[15]  Helen Gant Guillory,et al.  The Effects of Keyword Captions to Authentic French Video on Learner Comprehension , 2013 .

[16]  Saskia Brand-Gruwel,et al.  Participatory instructional redesign by students and teachers in secondary education: effects on perceptions of instruction , 2011 .

[17]  Sang Joon Lee,et al.  Examining the relationship among student perception of support, course satisfaction, and learning outcomes in online learning , 2011, Internet High. Educ..

[18]  John Field,et al.  An insight into listeners' problems: too much bottom-up or too much top-down? , 2004 .

[19]  Anand K. Gramopadhye,et al.  Evaluation of alternate multimedia for web-based asynchronous learning , 2007 .

[20]  Larry Vandergrift LEARNING TO LISTEN OR LISTENING TO LEARN , 2004 .

[21]  Jennifer Urner,et al.  Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy , 1995 .

[22]  Theodore W. FrickRajat College student perceptions of teaching and learning quality , 2009 .

[23]  Chi-Cheng Chang,et al.  Is single or dual channel with different English proficiencies better for English listening comprehension, cognitive load and attitude in ubiquitous learning environment? , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[24]  Suzanne Graham,et al.  Listening comprehension: The learners’ perspective , 2006 .

[25]  Larry Vandergrift,et al.  1. LISTENING TO LEARN OR LEARNING TO LISTEN? , 2004, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[26]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Cultural differences in the perception of a social-constructivist e-learning environment , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[27]  Luu Trong Tuan,et al.  Schema-building and Listening , 2010 .

[28]  M. Lepper,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivational Orientations in the Classroom: Age Differences and Academic Correlates , 2005 .

[29]  Jie-Chi Yang,et al.  Captions and reduced forms instruction: The impact on EFL students’ listening comprehension , 2013, ReCALL.

[30]  Melissa A. Stewart,et al.  Gains to Language Learners from Viewing Target Language Closed‐Captioned Films , 2004 .

[31]  Martine Danan,et al.  Captioning and Subtitling: Undervalued Language Learning Strategies , 2004 .

[32]  L. Steinman,et al.  Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (2nd ed.) by H. Douglas Brown , 2001 .