Evaluation method for in situ electric field in standardized human brain for different transcranial magnetic stimulation coils

This study proposes a method to evaluate the electric field induced in the brain by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to realize focal stimulation in the target area considering the inter-subject difference of the brain anatomy. The TMS is a non-invasive technique used for treatment/diagnosis, and it works by inducing an electric field in a specific area of the brain via a coil-induced magnetic field. Recent studies that report on the electric field distribution in the brain induced by TMS coils have been limited to simplified human brain models or a small number of detailed human brain models. Until now, no method has been developed that appropriately evaluates the coil performance for a group of subjects. In this study, we first compare the magnetic field and the magnetic vector potential distributions to determine if they can be used as predictors of the TMS focality derived from the electric field distribution. Next, the hotspots of the electric field on the brain surface of ten subjects using six coils are compared. Further, decisive physical factors affecting the focality of the induced electric field by different coils are discussed by registering the computed electric field in a standard brain space for the first time, so as to evaluate coil characteristics for a large population of subjects. The computational results suggest that the induced electric field in the target area cannot be generalized without considering the morphological variability of the human brain. Moreover, there was no remarkable difference between the various coils, although focality could be improved to a certain extent by modifying the coil design (e.g., coil radius). Finally, the focality estimated by the electric field was more correlated with the magnetic vector potential than the magnetic field in a homogeneous sphere.

[1]  Lari M. Koponen,et al.  Experimental Characterization of the Electric Field Distribution Induced by TMS Devices , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[2]  S. Lisanby,et al.  Electric field depth–focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: Simulation comparison of 50 coil designs , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[3]  Hiroyuki Ohsaki,et al.  Eccentric figure‐eight coils for transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2015, Bioelectromagnetics.

[4]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  Electric fields of motor and frontal tDCS in a standard brain space: A computer simulation study , 2016, NeuroImage.

[5]  J. Reilly,et al.  Survey of numerical electrostimulation models , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  A. Gershon,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression. , 2003, The American journal of psychiatry.

[7]  G. Pell,et al.  Realistic shape head model and spherical model as methods for TMS coil characterization , 2015, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  Satoshi Tanaka,et al.  Inter-subject Variability in Electric Fields of Motor Cortical tDCS , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[9]  P. Fitzgerald,et al.  A comprehensive review of the effects of rTMS on motor cortical excitability and inhibition , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  Y. Jimbo,et al.  Examination of the Influence by the Stimulation Coil Arrangement and the Shape of the Stimulation Object in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Using a Model , 2016, Electronics & communications in Japan.

[11]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Impact of the gyral geometry on the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2011, NeuroImage.

[12]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  Low-frequency electrical dosimetry: research agenda of the IEEE International Committee on Electromagnetic Safety. , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  Fast multigrid-based computation of the induced electric field for transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  R. W. Lau,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: III. Parametric models for the dielectric spectrum of tissues. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  Effects of coil orientation on the electric field induced by TMS over the hand motor area , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  Confirmation of quasi-static approximation in SAR evaluation for a wireless power transfer system , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[18]  Marta Parazzini,et al.  Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Modeling of Different Coil Configurations , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  S. Rossi,et al.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  Yasuhiko Jimbo,et al.  Examination of the Influence by the Stimulation Coil Arrangement and the Shape of the Stimulation Object in the Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Using a Model , 2014 .

[21]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  How the brain tissue shapes the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2011, NeuroImage.

[22]  Kwang-Hyuk Lee,et al.  Where does transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) stimulate? Modelling of induced field maps for some common cortical and cerebellar targets , 2012, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[23]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Neuroimage: Clinical Validating Computationally Predicted Tms Stimulation Areas Using Direct Electrical Stimulation in Patients with Brain Tumors near Precentral Regions , 2022 .

[24]  Marta Parazzini,et al.  Modelling of the Electric Field Distribution in Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Adolescence, in the Adulthood, and in the Old Age , 2016, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[25]  G. Crevecoeur,et al.  A DTI-based model for TMS using the independent impedance method with frequency-dependent tissue parameters , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  A. Dale,et al.  High‐resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[27]  A. Barker,et al.  NON-INVASIVE MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX , 1985, The Lancet.

[28]  S. Watanabe,et al.  Conductivities of epidermis, dermis, and subcutaneous tissue at intermediate frequencies , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  K. Harada,et al.  Localized stimulation of neural tissues in the brain by means of a paired configuration of time-varying magnetic fields , 1988 .

[30]  Iwahashi Masahiro,et al.  Evaluation method for in-situ electric field of different TMS coils in human brain , 2016 .

[31]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Physiological observations validate finite element models for estimating subject-specific electric field distributions induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex , 2013, NeuroImage.

[32]  Dietmar Frey,et al.  Preoperative Functional Mapping for Rolandic Brain Tumor Surgery: Comparison of Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Direct Cortical Stimulation , 2011, Neurosurgery.

[33]  A M Dale,et al.  Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  D F Stegeman,et al.  The influence of sulcus width on simulated electric fields induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  A. Hirata,et al.  Reducing the staircasing error in computational dosimetry of low-frequency electromagnetic fields , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  C. Miniussi,et al.  New insights into rhythmic brain activity from TMS–EEG studies , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Unbiased average age-appropriate atlases for pediatric studies , 2011, NeuroImage.

[38]  C. Almli,et al.  Unbiased nonlinear average age-appropriate brain templates from birth to adulthood , 2009, NeuroImage.