Productivity and Firm Selection: Quantifying the ‘New’ Gains from Trade

We discuss how standard computable equilibrium models of trade policy can be enriched with selection effects. This is achieved by estimating and simulating a partial equilibrium model that accounts for a number of real world effects of trade liberalisation: richer availability of product varieties; tougher competition and weaker market power of firms; better exploitation of economies of scale; and, of course, efficiency gains via firms selection. The model is estimated on EU data and then simulated in counterfactual scenarios. Gains from trade are much larger in the presence of selection effects with substantial variability across countries and sectors.

[1]  E. Helpman,et al.  Export Versus FDI with Heterogeneous Firms , 2004 .

[2]  B. Ark,et al.  PPPs for Industry Output: A New Dataset for International Comparisons , 2007 .

[3]  H. Overman,et al.  Unemployment Clusters Across European Regions and Countries , 1999 .

[4]  J. Imbs,et al.  The Dynamics of Trade and Competition , 2006 .

[5]  M. Waugh,et al.  International Trade and Income Differences , 2010 .

[6]  Massimo Del Gatto,et al.  Productivity and Firm Selection: Intra- vs International Trade , 2007 .

[7]  Paul Schreyer,et al.  Measuring Productivity , 1949, Nature.

[8]  Mary O'Mahony,et al.  EU KLEMS Growth and Productivity Accounts: An Overview , 2007 .

[9]  J. Mairesse,et al.  Panel-Data Estimates of the Production Function and the Revenue Function: What Difference Does it Make? , 2005 .

[10]  C. Croux,et al.  Robust Regression in Stata , 2008 .

[11]  T. Mayer,et al.  Illusory Border Effects: Distance mismeasurement inflates estimates of home bias in trade , 2002 .

[12]  Plant- and Firm-Level Evidence on "New" Trade Theories , 2001 .

[13]  K. Head,et al.  The Puzzling Persistence of the Distance Effect on Bilateral Trade , 2004, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[14]  Peter K. Schott,et al.  Trade costs, firms and productivity , 2006 .

[15]  Danny Quah,et al.  Regional convergence clusters across Europe , 1996 .

[16]  A. Rose,et al.  An Estimate of the Effect of Common Currencies on Trade and Income , 2001 .

[17]  P. Pagano,et al.  Trade-Revealed TFP , 2009 .

[18]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  Trading Partners and Trading Volumes , 2006 .

[19]  Laurent Gobillon,et al.  In Economics and Social Sciences Working Papers Series the Productivity Advantages of Large Cities: Distinguishing Agglomeration from Firm Selection the Productivity Advantages of Large Cities: Distinguishing Agglomeration from Firm Selection , 2022 .

[20]  Jacques-François Thisse,et al.  Agglomeration and Trade Revisited , 2002, World Scientific Studies in International Economics.

[21]  E. Helpman,et al.  The Dynamics of Firm-Level Adjustment to Trade Liberalization , 2007 .

[22]  Silvana Tenreyro,et al.  The Log of Gravity , 2004, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[23]  James E. Anderson,et al.  Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle , 2001 .

[24]  F. Famoye.  Continuous Univariate Distributions, Volume 1 , 1994 .

[25]  Nina Pavcnik,et al.  Trade Liberalization, Exit, and Productivity Improvements: Evidence from Chilean Plants , 2000 .

[26]  An Anatomy of International Trade: Evidence from French Firms , 2008 .

[27]  J. Haaland,et al.  Global Production Effects of European Integration , 1992 .

[28]  John Mccallum,et al.  National Borders Matter: Canada-U.S. Regional Trade Patterns , 1995 .

[29]  Thomas Chaney,et al.  Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margins of International Trade , 2008 .

[30]  Pierre-Philippe Combes,et al.  The trade-creating effects of business and social networks: evidence from France , 2005 .

[31]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  MULTILATERAL COMPARISONS OF OUTPUT, INPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY USING SUPERLATIVE INDEX NUMBERS* , 1982 .

[32]  T. Mayer,et al.  The Happy Few: The Internationalisation of European Firms , 2007 .

[33]  T. Mayer,et al.  Market Potential and the Location of Japanese Investment in the European Union , 2002, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[34]  Thierry Verdier,et al.  The Organization of Firms in a Global Economy , 2009 .

[35]  Onathan,et al.  Plants and Productivity in International Trade , 2004 .

[36]  Giordano Mion,et al.  Productivity and Firm Selection: Intra-National vs Inter-National Trade∗ , 2007 .

[37]  Marcello Pagnini,et al.  Openness to Trade and Industry Cost Dispersion: Evidence from a Panel of Italian Firms , 2008 .

[38]  R. Berk.  A Primer on Robust Regression , 1990 .

[39]  Jan De Loecker,et al.  Product Differentiation, Multi-Product Firms and Estimating the Impact of Trade Liberalization on Productivity , 2007 .

[40]  T. Mayer,et al.  Non-Europe: The magnitude and causes of market fragmentation in the EU , 2000 .

[41]  Daniel A. Ackerberg,et al.  Structural identification of production functions , 2006 .

[42]  Chad Syverson,et al.  Reallocation, Firm Turnover, and Efficiency: Selection on Productivity or Profitability? , 2005 .

[43]  J. Tybout.  Plant- and Firm-Level Evidence on "New" Trade Theories , 2001 .

[44]  T. Mayer,et al.  Market Potential and the Location of Japanese Firms in the European Union , 2004 .

[45]  Market Penetration Costs and the New Consumers Margin in International Trade , 2008 .

[46]  G. Ottaviano,et al.  Deeper, Wider and More Competitive? Monetary Integration, Eastern Enlargement and Competitiveness in the European Union , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[47]  Massimo Del Gatto,et al.  Measuring Productivity , 2008 .

[48]  T. Mayer,et al.  Market Access in Global and Regional Trade , 2005 .

[49]  James E. Anderson,et al.  Trade Costs , 2004 .

[50]  Saul Lach,et al.  Is "Learning-by-Exporting" Important? Micro-Dynamic Evidence from Colombia, Mexico and Morocco , 1996 .

[51]  Anders Åkerman,et al.  The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity: An Empirical Investigation , 2007 .

[52]  Marc J. Melitz.  The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity , 2003 .

[53]  R. Piermartini,et al.  Demystifying modelling methods for trade policy , 2005 .

[54]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  The Inconsistency of Common Scale Estimators When Output Prices are Unobserved and Engogenous , 1992 .

[55]  Sukkyun Chung,et al.  Productivity and Turnover in the Export Market: Micro-level Evidence from the Republic of Korea and Taiwan (China) , 2000 .

[56]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Continuous Univariate Distributions. , 1995 .

[57]  A. Venables,et al.  The location of European industry , 2000 .

[58]  B. Javorcik,et al.  To Share or Not to Share: Does Local Participation Matter for Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment? , 2003 .

[59]  S. Evenett.  Unequal Compliance: The 6th GTA Report , 2010 .

[60]  A. Bernard,et al.  Exceptional Exporter Performance: Cause, Effect, or Both? , 1997 .

[61]  Jonathan Eaton,et al.  Technology, Geography, and Trade , 2002 .

[62]  Roc Armenter,et al.  Economies of Scale and the Size of Exporters , 2009 .

[63]  P. Pagano,et al.  Ricardian Selection , 2009 .

[64]  A. Ciccone,et al.  TRADE AND PRODUCTIVITY , 2006 .

[65]  L. Winters.  Trade Flows and Trade Policy after 1992 , 1992 .

[66]  Massimo Del Gatto,et al.  Trade Integration, Firm Selection and the Costs of Non-Europe , 2006 .

[67]  G. Ottaviano,et al.  Market Size, Trade, and Productivity , 2005, World Scientific Studies in International Economics.

[68]  A. Pakes,et al.  The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry , 1992 .

[69]  A. Venables,et al.  Completing the internal market in the European Community: Some industry simulations , 1988 .

[70]  G. Trenkler.  Continuous univariate distributions , 1994 .

[71]  Natalie Chen,et al.  Intra-National Versus International Trade in the European Union: Why Do National Borders Matter? , 2002 .

[72]  E. Helpman,et al.  ESTIMATING TRADE FLOWS : TRADING PARTNERS AND TRADING VOLUMES Elhanan Helpman , 2007 .

[73]  G. Ottaviano,et al.  The Euro and the Competitiveness of European Firms , 2009 .