Effects of breaks and goal switches on the vigilance decrement

Abstract In this report, we examined the impact of rest breaks and goal switches on the vigilance decrement—the change in performance with time-on-task—and subjective stress and workload. In study 1, we examined the decrement in a visual line-length discrimination task employed in previous research. The task had a linear decrement in perceptual sensitivity with time-on-task based on the results of a trend analysis (orthogonal polynomial contrasts). In addition, the task had a profile of self-reported stress and workload similar to other moderately demanding vigilance tasks. In study 2, we examined the decrement in the same task with the factorial inclusion of rest breaks and goal switches late in the task. The inclusion of rest breaks resulted in a significant cubic trend in perceptual sensitivity. After the first rest break, there was a reversal of the linear downward decrement in perceptual sensitivity, but the second rest break did not elicit this change. The inclusion of goal switches did not cause any significant deviation from the linear trend and did not attenuate the decrement. In addition, the inclusion of rest breaks resulted in reduced self-reported effort and temporal demand. The results of the present study cohere with the expectations of a resource depletion account of the vigilance decrement.

[1]  McCORMACK Pd,et al.  Performance in a vigilance task as a function of interstimulus interval and interpolated rest. , 1958 .

[2]  R. Parasuraman.  Memory load and event rate control sensitivity decrements in sustained attention. , 1979, Science.

[3]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  Event-related cerebral hemodynamics reveal target-specific resource allocation for both “go” and “no-go” response-based vigilance tasks , 2013, Brain and Cognition.

[4]  W. Helton,et al.  Working memory load and the vigilance decrement , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  S. Malinen,et al.  Post-disaster depression and vigilance: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  William S. Helton,et al.  Visuospatial and verbal working memory load: effects on visuospatial vigilance , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  William S. Helton,et al.  The effects of emotional stimuli on target detection: Indirect and direct resource costs , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[8]  D. Washburn,et al.  Task engagement, cerebral blood flow velocity, and diagnostic monitoring for sustained attention. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[9]  C. Wickens,et al.  Workload transition: Implications for individual and team performance. , 1993 .

[10]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[11]  G. Keppel.  Data analysis for research designs , 1990 .

[12]  Tyler H. Shaw,et al.  Effects of sensory modality on cerebral blood flow velocity during vigilance , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[13]  Judi E. See,et al.  Meta-analysis of the sensitivity decrement in vigilance. , 1995 .

[14]  R. F. Thompson,et al.  Habituation: a model phenomenon for the study of neuronal substrates of behavior. , 1966, Psychological review.

[15]  N. Mackworth.  The Breakdown of Vigilance during Prolonged Visual Search 1 , 1948 .

[16]  W. Helton,et al.  Brief mental breaks and content-free cues may not keep you focused , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  P. Hancock,et al.  Human Mental Workload , 1988 .

[18]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  Vigilance Requires Hard Mental Work and Is Stressful , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[19]  G. Beauchamp,et al.  Time for some a priori thinking about post hoc testing , 2008 .

[20]  James L. Szalma,et al.  The Vigilance Decrement Reflects Limitations in Effortful Attention, Not Mindlessness , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[21]  John A. Detre,et al.  Imaging brain fatigue from sustained mental workload: An ASL perfusion study of the time-on-task effect , 2010, NeuroImage.

[22]  Edward M. Hitchcock,et al.  Automation cueing modulates cerebral blood flow and vigilance in a simulated air traffic control task , 2003 .

[23]  Rebecca A. Grier,et al.  Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: task engagement, distress, and worry. , 2002, Emotion.

[24]  B. Bergum,et al.  Vigilance performance as a function of interpolated rest. , 1962 .

[25]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  Cerebral Hemodynamics and Vigilance Performance , 2009 .

[26]  A. Chatterjee,et al.  Energetic effects of stimulus intensity on prolonged simple reaction-time performance , 2010, Psychological research.

[27]  P D McCORMACK.  Performance in a vigilance task as a function of interstimulus interval and interpolated rest. , 1958, Canadian journal of psychology.

[28]  A. G. Bills.  Blocking: a new principle of mental fatigue. , 1931 .

[29]  W. Helton,et al.  Signal salience and the mindlessness theory of vigilance. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[30]  Donald A. Wilson,et al.  Habituation revisited: An updated and revised description of the behavioral characteristics of habituation , 2009, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[31]  Kelley S. Parsons,et al.  The abbreviated vigilance task and cerebral hemodynamics , 2007, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[32]  S. Eickhoff,et al.  Sustaining attention to simple tasks: a meta-analytic review of the neural mechanisms of vigilant attention. , 2013, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  J. F. Mackworth.  Vigilance, arousal, and habituation. , 1968, Psychological review.

[34]  W. Helton.  The relationship between lateral differences in tympanic membrane temperature and behavioral impulsivity , 2010, Brain and Cognition.

[35]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  Effects of Cueing and Knowledge of Results on Workload and Boredom in Sustained Attention , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[36]  Raul Ramirez,et al.  Using cerebral hemovelocity to measure workload during a spatialised auditory vigilance task in novice and experienced observers , 2013, Ergonomics.

[37]  Richard F. Thompson.  Habituation: A history , 2009, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[38]  W. Helton,et al.  Target predictability, sustained attention, and response inhibition , 2013, Brain and Cognition.

[39]  William S. Helton,et al.  Sustained attention to local and global target features is different: Performance and tympanic membrane temperature , 2009, Brain and Cognition.

[40]  A. Lleras,et al.  Brief and rare mental “breaks” keep you focused: Deactivation and reactivation of task goals preempt vigilance decrements , 2010, Cognition.

[41]  P. Hancock,et al.  Cerebral lateralization of vigilance: A function of task difficulty , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  W. Helton,et al.  Search asymmetry, sustained attention, and response inhibition , 2011, Brain and Cognition.

[43]  Todd D. Hollander,et al.  Signal regularity and the mindlessness model of vigilance. , 2005, British journal of psychology.

[44]  Tyler H. Shaw,et al.  Effects of regular or irregular event schedules on cerebral hemovelocity during a sustained attention task , 2012, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[45]  William S. Helton,et al.  A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study of sustained attention to local and global target features , 2013, Brain and Cognition.