Do Parties Matter for Economic Outcomes? A Regression-Discontinuity Approach

A long-standing issue in political economics is whether party control makes a difference in determining fiscal and economics policies. This question is very difficult to answer empirically since parties are not randomly selected to govern political entities. This paper uses a regression-discontinuity design, i.e., party control changes discontinuously at 50 percent of the vote share, which can produce near experimental causal estimates of the effect of party control on economic outcomes. The method is applied to a large panel data set from Swedish local governments with a number of attractive features. The results show that there is an economically significant party effect: left-wing governments spend and tax 2-3 percent more than right-wing governments. Left-wing governments also have 7 percent lower unemployment rates, which is partly due to that left-wing governments employ 4 percent more workers than right-wing governments.

[1]  J. Hahn,et al.  IDENTIFICATION AND ESTIMATION OF TREATMENT EFFECTS WITH A REGRESSION-DISCONTINUITY DESIGN , 2001 .

[2]  Money, Politics and the Post-War Business Cycle , 1999 .

[3]  T. Besley Political Institutions and Policy Choices: Empirical Evidence from the United States , 2001 .

[4]  David S. Lee Randomized experiments from non-random selection in U.S. House elections , 2005 .

[5]  P. Rosenbaum The Consequences of Adjustment for a Concomitant Variable that Has Been Affected by the Treatment , 1984 .

[6]  J. Henderson The Tiebout Model: Bring Back the Entrepreneurs , 1985, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  A. Blais,et al.  Do Parties Make a Difference? Parties and the Size of Government in Liberal Democracies* , 1993 .

[8]  E. Duflo,et al.  How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates? , 2001 .

[9]  Francesco Trebbi,et al.  Endogenous Political Institutions , 2002 .

[10]  François Pétry,et al.  Left-right party ideology and government policies: A meta-analysis , 2001 .

[11]  Charles M. Tiebout A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures , 1956, Journal of Political Economy.

[12]  Larry M. Bartels Partisan Politics and the U . S . Income Distribution , 2004 .

[13]  C. Hoxby The Effects of Class Size on Student Achievement: New Evidence from Population Variation , 2000 .

[14]  Koleman Strumpf,et al.  Assessing the Importance of Tiebout Sorting: Local Heterogeneity from 1850 to 1990 , 2003 .

[15]  A. Case,et al.  Does Electoral Accountability Affect Economic Policy Choices? Evidence from Gubernatorial Term Limits , 1993 .

[16]  Martin J. Osborne,et al.  Spatial Models of Political Competition under Plurality Rule: A Survey of Some Explanations of the Number of Candidates and the Positions They Take , 1995 .

[17]  David S. Lee,et al.  Do Voters Affect or Elect Policies? Evidence from the U. S. House , 2004 .

[18]  A. Alesina Credibility and Policy Convergence in a Two-party System with Rational Voters , 1988 .

[19]  J. Sachs,et al.  Political and Economic Determinants of Budget Deficits in the Industrialdemocracies , 1988 .