Situational Method Engineering : Fundamentals and Experiences

International Federation for Information Processing The IFIP series publishes state-of-the-art results in the sciences and technologies of information and communication. The scope of the series includes: foundations of computer science; software theory and practice; education; computer applications in technology; communication systems; systems modeling and optimization; information systems; computers and society; computer systems technology; security and protection in information processing systems; artificial intelligence; and human-computer interaction. Proceedings and post-proceedings of referred international conferences in computer science and interdisciplinary fields are featured. These results often precede journal publication and represent the most current research. The principal aim of the IFIP series is to encourage education and the dissemination and exchange of information about all aspects of computing. For more information about the 300 other books in the IFIP series, please visit springer.com. For more information about IFIP, please visit ifip.org.

[1]  Reinhard Schütte,et al.  The Guidelines of Modeling - An Approach to Enhance the Quality in Information Models , 1998, ER.

[2]  Peter Meso,et al.  How Good Are These UML Diagrams? An Empirical Test of the Wand and Weber Good Decomposition Model , 2002, ICIS.

[3]  Motoshi Saeki,et al.  Specifying Software Specification & Design Methods , 1994, CAiSE.

[4]  M. Heym,et al.  A semantic data model for methodology engineering , 1992, [1992] Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Computer-Aided Software Engineering.

[5]  Steven L. Alter.  18 Reasons Why IT-Reliant Work Systems Should Replace "The IT Artifact" as the Core Subject Matter of the IS Field , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Sjaak Brinkkemper,et al.  Information Systems Engineering: State of the Art and Research Themes , 2000 .

[7]  S. Brinkkemper,et al.  A formal approach to the comparison of object-oriented analysis and design methodologies , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[8]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  Representing things and properties in conceptual modelling: an empirical evaluation , 2003, ECIS.

[9]  L. Heilmann.  Proceedings, Part II , 1943, Ecology.

[10]  Juha-Pekka Tolvanen,et al.  Method rationale in method engineering , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[11]  Colette Rolland,et al.  Towards a Meta-tool for Change-Centric Method Engineering: A Typology of Generic Operators , 2004, CAiSE.

[12]  Ludwig von Bertalanffy,et al.  Kritische Theorie der Formbildung , 1931 .

[13]  H. Simon.  The Sciences of the Artificial, (Third edition) , 1997 .

[14]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Amethodical systems development: the deferred meaning of systems development methods , 2000 .

[15]  Juha-Pekka Tolvanen,et al.  Managing Evolutionary Method Engineering by Method Rationale , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  Representing part-whole relations in conceptual modeling: an empirical evaluation , 2008 .

[17]  Luciano Baresi,et al.  Extending UML for modeling Web applications , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[18]  Ulrich Frank,et al.  Conceptual Modelling as the Core of the Information Systems Discipline - Perspectives and Epistemological Challenges , 1999 .

[19]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Action-oriented conceptual modelling , 2004, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Andrew Gemino,et al.  Complexity and clarity in conceptual modeling: Comparison of mandatory and optional properties , 2005, Data Knowl. Eng..

[21]  Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  No Silver Bullet: Essence and Accidents of Software Engineering , 1987 .

[22]  Anne H. Soukhanov,et al.  The american heritage dictionary of the english language , 1992 .

[23]  William N. Dunn,et al.  Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction , 1993 .

[24]  Robert Braun,et al.  Temporal Aspects in Business Processes - An Application to E-Government , 2004, EMISA.

[25]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  Software Engineering Economics , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[26]  Jinwoo Kim,et al.  How Do We Understand a System with (So) Many Diagrams? Cognitive Integration Processes in Diagrammatic Reasoning , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  Terry Halpin,et al.  Information modeling and relational databases: from conceptual analysis to logical design , 2001 .

[28]  Fadi P. Deek,et al.  A common model for problem solving and program development , 1999 .

[29]  Valeria Seidita,et al.  Composition of a New Process to Meet Agile Needs Using Method Engineering , 2004, SELMAS.

[30]  Stijn Hoppenbrouwers,et al.  Capturing Modeling Processes - Towards the MoDial Modeling Laboratory , 2006, OTM Workshops.

[31]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[32]  Colette Rolland,et al.  Towards a Generic Model for Situational Method Engineering , 2003, CAiSE.

[33]  H. A. Proper,et al.  A Conceptual Language for the Description and Manipulation of Complex Information Models , 1994 .

[34]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Software development method tailoring at Motorola , 2003, CACM.

[35]  Ron Weber,et al.  Should Optional Properties Be Used in Conceptual Modelling? A Theory and Three Empirical Tests , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[36]  Simon K. Milton,et al.  An Ontology of Data Modeling Languages: A Study Using a Common-Sense Realistic Ontology , 2004, J. Database Manag..

[37]  J. E. Anderson.  Public policy-making , 1975 .

[38]  Stijn Hoppenbrouwers,et al.  A Fundamental View on the Process of Conceptual Modeling , 2005, ER.

[39]  Fadi P. Deek,et al.  Collaborative software development: a discussion of problem solving models and groupware technologies , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[40]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Method configuration: adapting to situational characteristics while creating reusable assets , 2004, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[41]  Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede,et al.  On the Feasibility of Situational Method Engineering , 1997, Inf. Syst..

[42]  Naveen Prakash,et al.  Engineering Methods from Method Requirements Specifications , 2001, Requirements Engineering.

[43]  Ron Weber,et al.  On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars , 1993, Inf. Syst. J..

[44]  Martin Fowler,et al.  The new methodology , 2001, Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences.

[45]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Comparing representations with relational and EER models , 1990, Commun. ACM.

[46]  Sjaak Brinkkemper,et al.  Assembly Techniques for Method Engineering , 1998, CAiSE.

[47]  F. Fiedler.  A Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness1 , 1964 .

[48]  Guy Fitzgerald,et al.  Where now for development methodologies? , 2003, CACM.

[49]  J. J. V. R. Wintraecken,et al.  The NIAM Information Analysis Method , 1990, Springer Netherlands.

[50]  Don Tapscott,et al.  Paradigm shift: The new promise of information technology: Don Tapscott and Art Caston McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, 1993, 337 pp. £21.95 ISBN 0-07-062857-2 , 1992, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[51]  Tobias Bucher,et al.  Contextual Method Engineering , 2006 .

[52]  Robert Winter,et al.  Situational Change Engineering in Healthcare , 2006, ECEH.

[53]  Stijn Hoppenbrouwers,et al.  Towards explicit strategies for modeling , 2005 .

[54]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Perceived Ontological Weaknesses Of Process Modeling Techniques : Further Evidence , 2002, ECIS.

[55]  Patrick Delfmann,et al.  Adaptive Reference Modeling: Integrating Configurative and Generic Adaptation Techniques for Information Models , 2007 .

[56]  J. Beckmann,et al.  Action control : from cognition to behavior , 1985 .

[57]  Ron Weber,et al.  Stakeholder experiences with conceptual modeling: an empirical investigation , 1998, ICIS '98.

[58]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  The use of systems development methodologies in practice: a field study , 1997, Inf. Syst. J..

[59]  Steven Fraser,et al.  No silver bullet: a retrospective on the essence and accidents of software engineering , 2007, OOPSLA '07.

[60]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[61]  Ron Weber,et al.  Understanding relationships with attributes in entity-relationship diagrams , 1999, ICIS.

[62]  Isabelle Mirbel,et al.  Situational method engineering: combining assembly-based and roadmap-driven approaches , 2005, Requirements Engineering.

[63]  Gerard M. Wijers,et al.  Modelling support in information systems development , 1991 .

[64]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[65]  Steffen Greiffenberg,et al.  Methoden als Theorien der Wirtschaftsinformatik , 2003, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[66]  Ron Weber,et al.  Still desperately seeking the IT artifact , 2003 .

[67]  A. F. Harmsen,et al.  Situational Method Engineering , 1997 .

[68]  James A. Senn,et al.  Challenges and strategies for research in systems development , 1992 .

[69]  Ron Weber,et al.  Are Attributes Entities? A Study of Database Designers' Memory Structures , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[70]  Sjaak Brinkkemper,et al.  Intranet Facilitated Knowledge Management: A Theory and Tool for Defining Situational Methods , 1997, CAiSE.

[71]  Ron Weber,et al.  Research Commentary: Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling - A Research Agenda , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[72]  이훈,et al.  지각된 유용성(Perceived Usefulness)의 영향분석 , 2004 .

[73]  James A. Highsmith,et al.  Adaptive Software Development: A Collaborative Approach to Managing Complex Systems , 1999 .

[74]  T. Allen,et al.  Hierarchy Theory: A Vision, Vocabulary, and Epistemology , 1996 .

[75]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  Methodology Engineering R : a proposal for situation-specific methodology construction , 1992 .

[76]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[77]  Ortrun Zuber-Skerritt,et al.  Action Research for Change and Development , 2021 .

[78]  Thomas A. Gutzwiller,et al.  Das CC RIM-Referenzmodell für den Entwurf von betrieblichen, transaktionsorientierten Informationssystemen , 1994 .

[79]  Heinrich Herre,et al.  GOL: A general ontological language , 2001 .

[80]  Gert-Jan de Vreede,et al.  A Repeatable Collaboration Process for Usability Testing , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[81]  Paul Veerkamp,et al.  Modeling Design Process , 1990, AI Mag..

[82]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Collaborative Practice Research , 2000, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[83]  P. Sabatier.  Theories of the Policy Process , 1999 .

[84]  Matti Rossi,et al.  Method engineering: current research directions and implications for future research , 1996 .

[85]  Fredrik Karlsson,et al.  Method Components - Rationale Revealed , 2004, CAiSE.

[86]  Gerd Wagner,et al.  On the General Ontological Foundations of Conceptual Modeling , 2002, ER.

[87]  Sjaak Brinkkemper,et al.  Situational method engineering for informational system project approaches , 1994, Methods and Associated Tools for the Information Systems Life Cycle.

[88]  Cynthia K. Riemenschneider,et al.  Explaining Software Development tool Use with the Technology Acceptance Model , 2001, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[89]  T. Davenport,et al.  How executives can shape their company's information systems. , 1989, Harvard business review.

[90]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[91]  Richard R. Weber.  Ontological Foundations of Information Systems: Coopers and Lybrand , 1997 .

[92]  Karlheinz Kautz.  The Enactment of Methodology: The Case of Developing a Multimedia Information System , 2004, ICIS.

[93]  David A. Carrington,et al.  UML Class Diagram Syntax: An Empirical Study of Comprehension , 2001, InVis.au.

[94]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[95]  Sjaak Brinkkemper,et al.  Method engineering: engineering of information systems development methods and tools , 1996, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[96]  A. Boonstra.  Information systems and organizational change , 2002 .

[97]  Timothy Burns,et al.  A cross-collegiate analysis of software development course content , 2005, SIGITE '05.

[98]  Ron Weber,et al.  Conceptual Modelling and Ontology: Possibilities and Pitfalls , 2002, ER.

[99]  W. Ashby,et al.  Principles of the self-organizing dynamic system. , 1947, The Journal of general psychology.

[100]  Bernhard Beckert.  Equality and Other Theories , 1999 .

[101]  Teade Punter,et al.  The MEMA-model: towards a new approach for Method Engineering , 1996, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[102]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Collaboration Engineering with ThinkLets to Pursue Sustained Success with Group Support Systems , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[103]  Boris Wyssusek,et al.  Ontological Foundations of Conceptual Modelling Reconsidered: A Response , 2006, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[104]  David E. Avison,et al.  Method Engineering: Reflections on the Past and Ways Forward , 2003, AMCIS.

[105]  Stijn Hoppenbrouwers,et al.  Formal Modelling as a Grounded Conversation , 2005 .

[106]  Brian Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Method engineering for OO systems development , 2003, CACM.

[107]  Stijn Hoppenbrouwers,et al.  Giving Meaning to Enterprise Architectures: Architecture Principles with ORM and ORC , 2006, OTM Workshops.

[108]  Michael Schrefl,et al.  How to compose an object-oriented business process model? , 1996 .

[109]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[110]  Carl J. Friedrich,et al.  Man and His Government , 1968 .

[111]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[112]  Pekka Abrahamsson,et al.  New directions on agile methods: a comparative analysis , 2003, 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings..

[113]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  How to Combine Tools and Methods in Practice - a Field Study , 1990, CAiSE.

[114]  R. Briggs,et al.  Meeting Satisfaction for Technology-Supported Groups , 2006 .

[115]  Matti Rossi,et al.  A functional framework for evaluating method engineering environments: the case of Maestro II/ Decamerone and MetaEdit+ , 1996 .

[116]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  MetaEdit - A Flexible Graphical Environment for Methodology Modelling , 1991, CAiSE.

[117]  Murugan Anandarajan,et al.  Academic vs. practitioner systems planning and analysis , 2004, CACM.

[118]  Jeffrey Parsons,et al.  An Experimental Evaluation of Property Precedence in Conceptual Modelling , 2004, APCCM.

[119]  A. Schneider,et al.  Policy Design for Democracy , 1997 .

[120]  Carine Souveyet,et al.  Patterns for Extending an OO Model with Temporal Features , 1998 .

[121]  Klaus Wimmer.  Conceptual modelling based on ontological principles , 1992 .

[122]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Method Configuration with Development Tracks and Generic Project Types , 2001 .

[123]  M. Hult,et al.  TOWARDS A DEFINITION OF ACTION RESEARCH: A NOTE AND BIBLIOGRAPHY , 1980 .

[124]  B. Nick Rossiter,et al.  The logic for social systems , 2008 .

[125]  Jan Stage,et al.  Method Engineering. Principles of Method Construction and Tool Support , 1996 .