Discourse and Text: Linguistic and Intertextual Analysis within Discourse Analysis

This paper is an argument for systematic textual analysis as a part of discourse analysis, and an attempt to stimulate debate on this issue between different approaches to discourse analysis. Two types of textual analysis are distinguished: linguistic analysis and intertextual analysis. On the basis of a reanalysis of data samples in papers published in the first four issues of Discourse & Society, the paper argues that diverse approaches to discourse analysis can be enhanced through systematic use of these two forms of analysis, even those which claim a concern with the content rather than the form of texts. It is suggested that textual analysis needs to be based upon a multifunctional theory of language such as systematic-functional linguistics. Finally, the paper suggests theoretical, methodological, historical and political reasons why textual analysis ought to be more widely recognized as a method in social research.

[1]  N. Fairclough Discourse and social change , 1992 .

[2]  T. Liebes,et al.  A Mother's Battle Against TV News: A Case Study of Political Socialization , 1991 .

[3]  J. Sorenson Mass Media and Discourse on Famine in the Horn of Africa , 1991 .

[4]  K. Hacker,et al.  Oppositional Readings of Network Television News: Viewer Deconstruction , 1991 .

[5]  S. Fisher A Discourse of the Social: Medical Talk/Power Talk/Oppositional Talk? , 1991 .

[6]  J. Thompson Ideology and Modern Culture , 1991 .

[7]  Discourses of Danger and Dangerous Discourses: Patrolling the Borders of Science, Nature and Society , 1991 .

[8]  K. Yankah Oratory in Akan Society , 1991 .

[9]  R. Wodak Turning the Tables: Antisemitic Discourse in Post-War Austria , 1991 .

[10]  Susan L. Kline,et al.  The Rhetorical Construction of a President , 1990 .

[11]  H. Mehan,et al.  Nuclear Discourse in the 1980s: The Unravelling Conventions of the Cold War , 1990 .

[12]  P. Ullah,et al.  Rhetoric and Ideology in Social Identification: The Case of Second Generation Irish Youths , 1990 .

[13]  P. Chilton Politeness, Politics and Diplomacy , 1990 .

[14]  US Media Discourse on South Africa: The Development of a Situation Model , 1990 .

[15]  T. V. Dijk Discourse & Society: A New Journal for a New Research Focus , 1990 .

[16]  C. West,et al.  Not Just `Doctors' Orders': Directive-Response Sequences in Patients' Visits to Women and Men Physicians , 1990 .

[17]  G. Seidel `Thank God I Said No to AIDS': On the Changing Discourse of AIDS in Uganda , 1990 .

[18]  Stacking the Cards of Ideology: The History of the Sun Souvenir Royal Album , 1990 .

[19]  T. V. Dijk News as Discourse , 1990 .

[20]  R. Flacks Making History: The American Left and the American Mind , 1988 .

[21]  D. Maingueneau Nouvelles tendances en analyse du discours , 1987 .

[22]  M. Bakhtin,et al.  Speech genres and other late essays , 1988 .

[23]  M. Foucault,et al.  Foucault: A Critical Reader , 1986 .

[24]  J. Kristeva,et al.  The Kristeva Reader , 1986 .

[25]  Michael Halliday,et al.  An Introduction to Functional Grammar , 1985 .

[26]  J. Thompson Studies in the theory of ideology , 1987 .

[27]  A. Giddens The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[28]  R. Fawcett Language as social semiotic , 1984 .

[29]  E. Mishler,et al.  Discourse Of Medicine Dialectics Of Medical Interviews , 2017 .

[30]  G. Psathas Everyday language : studies in ethnomethodology , 1981 .

[31]  J. Habermas Theory of Communicative Action , 1981 .

[32]  P. Wagley 'Doctor's orders'. , 1980, Archives of internal medicine.

[33]  Gunther Kress,et al.  Language as Ideology , 1997 .

[34]  G. Kress,et al.  Language and Control , 1980 .

[35]  T. Givón,et al.  On Understanding Grammar , 1979 .

[36]  R. Barthes,et al.  Image-Music-Text , 1977 .

[37]  Michael Halliday,et al.  Cohesion in English , 1976 .