Induction of dendritic spines by an extracellular domain of AMPA receptor subunit GluR2

Synaptic transmission from excitatory nerve cells in the mammalian brain is largely mediated by AMPA (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid)-type glutamate receptors located at the surface of dendritic spines. The abundance of postsynaptic AMPA receptors correlates with the size of the synapse and the dimensions of the dendritic spine head. Moreover, long-term potentiation is associated with the formation of dendritic spines as well as synaptic delivery of AMPA receptors. The molecular mechanisms that coordinate AMPA receptor delivery and spine morphogenesis are unknown. Here we show that overexpression of the glutamate receptor 2 (GluR2) subunit of AMPA receptors increases spine size and density in hippocampal neurons, and more remarkably, induces spine formation in GABA-releasing interneurons that normally lack spines. The extracellular N-terminal domain (NTD) of GluR2 is responsible for this effect, and heterologous fusion proteins of the NTD of GluR2 inhibit spine morphogenesis. We propose that the NTD of GluR2 functions at the cell surface as part of a receptor–ligand interaction that is important for spine growth and/or stability.

[1]  A. Fayyazuddin,et al.  Four Residues of the Extracellular N-Terminal Domain of the NR2A Subunit Control High-Affinity Zn2+ Binding to NMDA Receptors , 2000, Neuron.

[2]  Michael E Greenberg,et al.  EphB Receptors Interact with NMDA Receptors and Regulate Excitatory Synapse Formation , 2000, Cell.

[3]  Y. Stern-Bach,et al.  Functional Assembly of AMPA and Kainate Receptors Is Mediated by Several Discrete Protein-Protein Interactions , 2001, Neuron.

[4]  N. Toni,et al.  LTP promotes formation of multiple spine synapses between a single axon terminal and a dendrite , 1999, Nature.

[5]  Peter Somogyi,et al.  Cell Type and Pathway Dependence of Synaptic AMPA Receptor Number and Variability in the Hippocampus , 1998, Neuron.

[6]  Yasushi Miyashita,et al.  Dendritic spine geometry is critical for AMPA receptor expression in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  V. Piëch,et al.  Subunit-specific temporal and spatial patterns of AMPA receptor exocytosis in hippocampal neurons , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  K. Williams,et al.  A regulatory domain (R1-R2) in the amino terminus of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor: effects of spermine, protons, and ifenprodil, and structural similarity to bacterial leucine/isoleucine/valine binding protein. , 1999, Molecular pharmacology.

[9]  R. Dingledine,et al.  Differential Dependence on GluR2 Expression of Three Characteristic Features of AMPA Receptors , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  M. Mishina,et al.  The AMPA receptor interacts with and signals through the protein tyrosine kinase Lyn , 1999, Nature.

[11]  E. Gouaux,et al.  Structure of a glutamate-receptor ligand-binding core in complex with kainate , 1998, Nature.

[12]  Roberto Malinow,et al.  Subunit-Specific Rules Governing AMPA Receptor Trafficking to Synapses in Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons , 2001, Cell.

[13]  A. Fayyazuddin,et al.  Molecular Organization of a Zinc Binding N-Terminal Modulatory Domain in a NMDA Receptor Subunit , 2000, Neuron.

[14]  K. Svoboda,et al.  Rapid spine delivery and redistribution of AMPA receptors after synaptic NMDA receptor activation. , 1999, Science.

[15]  Terri L. Gilbert,et al.  The ligand-binding domain in metabotropic glutamate receptors is related to bacterial periplasmic binding proteins , 1993, Neuron.

[16]  W. Hoch,et al.  Subtype-specific Assembly of α-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole Propionic Acid Receptor Subunits Is Mediated by Their N-terminal Domains* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  Michael Pasternack,et al.  α-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic Acid (AMPA) Receptor Channels Lacking the N-terminal Domain* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[18]  S. Lipton,et al.  Identification and Mechanism of Action of Two Histidine Residues Underlying High-Affinity Zn2+ Inhibition of the NMDA Receptor , 1999, Neuron.

[19]  G. Westbrook,et al.  N-Terminal Domains in the NR2 Subunit Control Desensitization of NMDA Receptors , 1998, Neuron.

[20]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Differences in Ca2+ permeability of AMPA-type glutamate receptor channels in neocortical neurons caused by differential GluR-B subunit expression , 1994, Neuron.

[21]  Z. Nusser.  AMPA amd NMDA receptors: similarities and differences in their synaptic distribution , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[22]  Petter Laake,et al.  Different modes of expression of AMPA and NMDA receptors in hippocampal synapses , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  R. Fetter,et al.  Neuroligin Expressed in Nonneuronal Cells Triggers Presynaptic Development in Contacting Axons , 2000, Cell.

[24]  R. Bernards,et al.  A System for Stable Expression of Short Interfering RNAs in Mammalian Cells , 2002, Science.

[25]  Guosong Liu,et al.  Regulation of Dendritic Spine Morphology and Synaptic Function by Shank and Homer , 2001, Neuron.

[26]  F. Engert,et al.  Dendritic spine changes associated with hippocampal long-term synaptic plasticity , 1999, Nature.

[27]  K. Svoboda,et al.  Rapid dendritic morphogenesis in CA1 hippocampal dendrites induced by synaptic activity. , 1999, Science.

[28]  G. Brewer,et al.  Optimized survival of hippocampal neurons in B27‐supplemented neurobasal™, a new serum‐free medium combination , 1993, Journal of neuroscience research.

[29]  S. Heinemann,et al.  Agonist selectivity of glutamate receptors is specified by two domains structurally related to bacterial amino acid-binding proteins , 1994, Neuron.

[30]  J. Lerma,et al.  Glycine-Independent NMDA Receptor Desensitization: Localization of Structural Determinants , 1998, Neuron.