Smart instrumentation for determination of ligament stiffness and ligament balance in total knee arthroplasty.

Ligament balance is an important and subjective task performed during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedure. For this reason, it is desirable to develop instruments to quantitatively assess the soft-tissue balance since excessive imbalance can accelerate prosthesis wear and lead to early surgical revision. The instrumented distractor proposed in this study can assist surgeons on performing ligament balance by measuring the distraction gap and applied load. Also the device allows the determination of the ligament stiffness which can contribute a better understanding of the intrinsic mechanical behavior of the knee joint. Instrumentation of the device involved the use of hall-sensors for measuring the distractor displacement and strain gauges to transduce the force. The sensors were calibrated and tested to demonstrate their suitability for surgical use. Results show the distraction gap can be measured reliably with 0.1mm accuracy and the distractive loads could be assessed with an accuracy in the range of 4N. These characteristics are consistent with those have been proposed, in this work, for a device that could assist on performing ligament balance while permitting surgeons evaluation based on his experience. Preliminary results from in vitro tests were in accordance with expected stiffness values for medial collateral ligament (MCL) and lateral collateral ligament (LCL).

[1]  M. Kuster,et al.  Sensitivity of knee soft-tissues to surgical technique in total knee arthroplasty. , 2011, The Knee.

[2]  Seok-Jung Kim,et al.  Agreements between different methods of gap balance estimation in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty , 2008, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[3]  D. Kohn,et al.  Der so genannte Knee Balance® , 2000, Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie.

[4]  H. Yamamoto,et al.  Soft-tissue balancing with pressure distribution during total knee arthroplasty. , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[5]  Shinichi Yoshiya,et al.  Joint gap kinematics in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty measured by a new tensor with the navigation system. , 2006, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[6]  Frederick W Werner,et al.  The effect of valgus/varus malalignment on load distribution in total knee replacements. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  F. Picard,et al.  A quantitative method of effective soft tissue management for varus knees in total knee replacement surgery using navigational techniques , 2007, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[8]  S. Röhrl,et al.  A new method to measure ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty: laxity measurements in 100 knees , 2012, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[9]  A. Hakki,et al.  Navigational predictors in determining the necessity for collateral ligament release in total knee replacement. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[10]  M. Ritter,et al.  Posterior cruciate ligament balancing during total knee arthroplasty. , 1988, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[11]  K. Aminian,et al.  A randomised controlled clinical trial and gait analysis of fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee replacements with a five-year follow-up. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  H.W.J. Huiskes,et al.  Basic orthopaedic biomechanics and mechano-biology , 2005 .

[13]  James A. Johnson,et al.  Computer-assisted gap equalization in total knee arthroplasty. , 2007, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  Philippe Cinquin,et al.  Robotized distraction device for knee replacement surgery , 2004, CARS.

[15]  Oguz Atasoy,et al.  Instrumented prosthesis for knee implants monitoring , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering.

[16]  S F Attfield,et al.  Measurement of soft tissue imbalance in total knee arthroplasty using electronic instrumentation. , 1994, Medical engineering & physics.

[17]  J. A. Johnson,et al.  Application of an Intra-operative Load Measuring System for Knee Replacement Surgery , 2003, MICCAI.

[18]  J. Burger,et al.  Surgical instrumentation for the in vivo determination of human lumbar spinal segment stiffness and viscoelasticity. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[19]  M. Rousseau,et al.  Early mechanical failure in total knee arthroplasty , 2008, International Orthopaedics.

[20]  R Nizard,et al.  Computer assisted surgery for total knee arthroplasty. , 2002, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[21]  HighWire Press,et al.  The journal of bone and joint surgery - British volume , 1948 .

[22]  P. Cinquin,et al.  Automated hydraulic tensor for Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2005, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[23]  Chafiaâ Hamitouche-Djabou,et al.  Design and Evaluation of Instrumented Smart Knee Implant , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  Frederic Picard,et al.  Comparative analysis of the structural properties of the collateral ligaments of the human knee. , 2012, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[25]  L. Korbee,et al.  Ligament balancing in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: Improved clinical results with a spring-loaded tensioning device , 2007, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[26]  Lutz-Peter Nolte,et al.  Development of a force amplitude- and location-sensing device designed to improve the ligament balancing procedure in TKA , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  Johan Bellemans,et al.  Total knee arthroplasty: a guide to get better performance , 2005 .