Time After Time: The Psychological Reality of the Ego- and Time-Reference-Point Distinction in Metaphorical Construals of Time

Research in cognitive linguistics and in processing of temporal metaphors has traditionally distinguished between Moving-Ego and Moving-Time mappings: Either the Ego is construed as moving regarding fixed temporal landmarks or Time is construed as moving regarding the Ego. Both of these metaphors involve time events in reference to an Ego, which specifies the present time Now.We build on recent theoretical suggestions for a more fundamental classification of temporal metaphors: Ego- and Time-Reference-Point metaphors (Ego-RP and Time-RP). The distinction focuses on the role of reference points in ascribing orientation, rather than on the identity of a moving entity (Ego or Time). Using visual priming experiments we provide evidence of the psychological reality of the Time-RP metaphor, a temporal metaphor with no reference to an Ego.

[1]  F. Moore.  Cognitive development and the acquisition of language , 1973 .

[2]  H. H. Clark.  SPACE, TIME, SEMANTICS, AND THE CHILD , 1973 .

[3]  C. Fillmore.  Towards a Descriptive Framework for Spatial Deixis , 1982 .

[4]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1982 .

[5]  M. Turner,et al.  Death Is the Mother of Beauty: Mind, Metaphor, Criticism , 1987 .

[6]  N. Presmeg.  The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason , 1992 .

[7]  G. Lakoff.  The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor , 1993 .

[8]  S. Glucksberg,et al.  Conceptual metaphors are not automatically accessed during idiom comprehension , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[9]  Herbert L. Colston,et al.  The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations , 1995 .

[10]  R. Gibbs.  Why many concepts are metaphorical , 1996, Cognition.

[11]  J. Mahon.  The Poetics of Mind , 1996 .

[12]  C. Fillmore.  Lectures on Deixis , 1997 .

[13]  M. McGlone,et al.  Back (or forward?) to the future: The role of perspective in temporal language comprehension. , 1998 .

[14]  W. Freeman,et al.  Reclaiming cognition : the primacy of action, intention and emotion , 1999 .

[15]  G. Lakoff.  Philosophy in the flesh , 1999 .

[16]  L. Boroditsky.  Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors , 2000, Cognition.

[17]  K. E. Moore,et al.  Spatial experience and temporal metaphors in Wolof : point of view, conceptual mapping, and linguistic practice , 2000 .

[18]  Merideth Leigh Gattis,et al.  Spatial schemas and abstract thought , 2001 .

[19]  D. Gentner,et al.  As time goes by: Evidence for two systems in processing space → time metaphors , 2002 .

[20]  Lera Boroditsky,et al.  The Roles of Body and Mind in Abstract Thought , 2002, Psychological science.

[21]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Where mathematics comes from : how the embodied mind brings mathematics into being , 2002 .

[22]  edrt CJentner.  Spatial Metaphors in Temporal Reasoning , 2003 .

[23]  V. Pitts,et al.  In the Flesh: The Cultural Politics of Body Modification , 2015 .

[24]  Mutsumi Imai,et al.  Is the future always ahead? Evidence for system-mappings in understanding space-time metaphors , 2003 .

[25]  Vyvyan Evans,et al.  The Structure of Time , 2003 .

[26]  S. Levinson.  Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity , 2003 .

[27]  Rafael E. Núñez,et al.  With the Future Behind Them: Convergent Evidence From Aymara Language and Gesture in the Crosslinguistic Comparison of Spatial Construals of Time , 2006, Cogn. Sci..