Scaling Up and Zooming In: Big Data and Personalization in Language Learning.

From its earliest days, practitioners of computer-assisted language learning (CALL) have collected data from computer-mediated learning environments. Indeed, that has been a central aspect of the field from the beginning. Usage logs provided valuable insights into how systems were used and how effective they were for language learning. That information could be analyzed to improve instructional design and delivery. Maintaining learning histories and personal profiles of individual learners enabled a program to adapt the delivery of learning materials to the record of student performance. Given a limited number of users working within a single system, the data generated could be collected and analyzed easily, using simple methods and tools such as spreadsheets and basic data models. The situation today is quite different from that scenario. Learners are likely to be using multiple online tools and services, all of which may be recording data. That includes general use software and services such as Facebook and Google, as well as mobile devices. If they are university students, they are likely to be generating data points through a learning management system (LMS) as well as from other university-level systems. The vast amount of information collected today from our use of online tools and services provides a huge storehouse of information that can be mined to provide both general usage trends and individualized reports. This big data offers valuable teaching and learning insights. In this column, we will be looking at what this may mean in language learning. That will include discussion of the emerging field of learning analytics, the use of learner models, and the opportunities afforded by data tracking for personalized learning.

[1]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Web-Based Collaborative Writing in L2 Contexts: Methodological Insights from Text Mining. , 2017 .

[2]  Mario-Jesús Mira-Giménez Análisis del e-PEL (Portfolio Europeo de las Lenguas Electrónico): opinión de los alumnos sobre Descriptores, Aprender a aprender y Autoevaluación , 2017 .

[3]  Frederik Cornillie,et al.  Examining focused L2 practice: from in vitro to in vivo , 2017 .

[4]  Robert Godwin-Jones Mobile Learning: Languages, Literacies and Cultures , 2016 .

[5]  George Siemens,et al.  The connected learning analytics toolkit , 2016, LAK.

[6]  Susan Bull,et al.  Negotiated learner modelling to maintain today’s learner models , 2016, Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning.

[7]  Barbara Wasson,et al.  Competence visualisation: Making sense of data from 21st-century technologies in language learning , 2016, ReCALL.

[8]  B. Cope,et al.  Big Data Comes to School , 2016 .

[9]  Nilubon Tongchai,et al.  Impact of Self-Regulation and Open Learner Model on Learning Achievement in Blended Learning Environment , 2016 .

[10]  H. Drachsler,et al.  Privacy and Learning Analytics - it's a DELICATE issue , 2016 .

[11]  John Fritz LMS Course Design As Learning Analytics Variable , 2016, PCLA@LAK.

[12]  Judy Kay,et al.  SMILI☺: a Framework for Interfaces to Learning Data in Open Learner Models, Learning Analytics and Related Fields , 2016, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.

[13]  Hiroaki Ogata,et al.  Ubiquitous learning analytics in the real-world language learning , 2015, Smart Learning Environments.

[14]  Judy Kay,et al.  MOOClm: User Modelling for MOOCs , 2015, UMAP.

[15]  Qinglan Yu Learning Analytics: The next frontier for computer assisted language learning in big data age , 2015 .

[16]  Zachary A. Pardos,et al.  moocRP: An Open-source Analytics Platform , 2015, L@S.

[17]  Megan Case Language students’ personal learning environments through an activity theory lens , 2015 .

[18]  Kelly Flanagan Domains, Personal APIs, and Portfolios , 2015 .

[19]  Mairéad Nic Giolla Mhichíl,et al.  Authentic oral language production and interaction in CALL: An evolving conceptual framework for the use of learning analytics within the SpeakApps project , 2014 .

[20]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  The impact of a mobile personal learning environment in different educational contexts , 2015, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[21]  Catherine Faron-Zucker,et al.  An enhanced personal learning environment using social semantic web technologies , 2014, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[22]  Chih-Kai Chang,et al.  A personalized recommendation-based mobile learning approach to improving the reading performance of EFL students , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[23]  Erik Duval,et al.  Learning Analytics Dashboard Applications , 2013 .

[24]  Judy Kay,et al.  Open Learner Models as Drivers for Metacognitive Processes , 2013 .

[25]  Dinesh Kumar Saini,et al.  Design of a Recommender System for Web Based Learning , 2013 .

[26]  Valentin Zacharias,et al.  Applying quantified self approaches to support reflective learning , 2012, LAK.

[27]  Personalized Sequential Language Vocabulary Learning Recommender System , 2012 .

[28]  Ilona Laakkonen,et al.  Personal learning environments in higher education language courses: an informal and learner-centred approach , 2011 .

[29]  Susan Bull,et al.  Encouraging advanced second language speakers to recognise their language difficulties: a personalised computer-based approach , 2010 .

[30]  Robert Godwin-Jones Personal learning environments , 2009 .

[31]  Trude Heift Modeling learner variability in CALL , 2008 .

[32]  Charles Anderson,et al.  The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete , 2008 .

[33]  Vladan Devedzic,et al.  Education and the Semantic Web , 2005, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[34]  Paul Brna,et al.  Mr. Collins: A collaboratively constructed, inspectable student model for intelligent computer assisted language learning , 1995 .

[35]  Amanda Porterfield The Great Awakening , 2020 .