The response of small SQUID pickup loops to magnetic fields

In the past, magnetic images acquired using scanning superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) microscopy have been interpreted using simple models for the sensor point spread function. However, more complicated modeling is needed when the characteristic dimensions of the field sensitive areas in these sensors become comparable to the London penetration depth. In this paper we calculate the response of SQUIDs with deep sub-micron pickup loops to different sources of magnetic fields by solving coupled London’s and Maxwell’s equations using the full sensor geometry. Tests of these calculations using various field sources are in reasonable agreement with experiments. These calculations allow us to more accurately interpret sub-micron spatial resolution data obtained using scanning SQUID microscopy.

[1]  D. Ralph,et al.  Scanning SQUID susceptometers with sub-micron spatial resolution. , 2016, The Review of scientific instruments.

[2]  B. Kalisky,et al.  Mechanical Control of Individual Superconducting Vortices , 2016, Nano letters.

[3]  Eli Zeldov,et al.  A scanning superconducting quantum interference device with single electron spin sensitivity. , 2013, Nature nanotechnology.

[4]  C. Ahn,et al.  Scanning SQUID susceptometry of a paramagnetic superconductor , 2012, 1204.3355.

[5]  M. Huber,et al.  Self-aligned nanoscale SQUID on a tip. , 2010, Nano letters.

[6]  M. Huber,et al.  Gradiometric micro-SQUID susceptometer for scanning measurements of mesoscopic samples. , 2008, The Review of scientific instruments.

[7]  Dick Veldhuis,et al.  NanoSQUIDs Based on Niobium Constrictions , 2007 .

[8]  E. Brandt Thin superconductors and SQUIDs in perpendicular magnetic field , 2005, cond-mat/0506144.

[9]  Alexander I. Bobenko,et al.  A Discrete Laplace–Beltrami Operator for Simplicial Surfaces , 2005, Discret. Comput. Geom..

[10]  D. Mailly,et al.  Scanning μ-superconduction quantum interference device force microscope , 2002 .

[11]  D. Mailly,et al.  Micro-superconducting quantum interference device characteristics , 2002 .

[12]  M. Ketchen,et al.  Scanning superconducting quantum interference device susceptometry , 2001 .

[13]  William J. Gallagher,et al.  High‐resolution scanning SQUID microscope , 1995 .

[14]  J. J. Kingston,et al.  Magnetic microscopy using a liquid nitrogen cooled YBa2Cu3O7 superconducting quantum interference device , 1993 .

[15]  L. N. Vu,et al.  Design and implementation of a scanning SQUID microscope , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[16]  D. Awschalom,et al.  Design, fabrication, and performance of integrated miniature SQUID susceptometers , 1989 .

[17]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Structure of Superconductive Vortices near a Metal‐Air Interface , 1966 .

[18]  A. Kleinsasser,et al.  dc SQUID flux focuser , 1985 .

[19]  Francis Patrick Rogers A device for experimental observation of flux vortices trapped in superconducting thin films , 1983 .