Estimation of Controlled Direct Effects in Longitudinal Mediation Analyses with Latent Variables in Randomized Studies

Abstract In a randomized study with longitudinal data on a mediator and outcome, estimating the direct effect of treatment on the outcome at a particular time requires adjusting for confounding of the association between the outcome and all preceding instances of the mediator. When the confounders are themselves affected by treatment, standard regression adjustment is prone to severe bias. In contrast, G-estimation requires less stringent assumptions than path analysis using SEM to unbiasedly estimate the direct effect even in linear settings. In this article, we propose a G-estimation method to estimate the controlled direct effect of treatment on the outcome, by adapting existing G-estimation methods for time-varying treatments without mediators. The proposed method can accommodate continuous and noncontinuous mediators, and requires no models for the confounders. Unbiased estimation only requires correctly specifying a mean model for either the mediator or the outcome. The method is further extended to settings where the mediator or outcome, or both, are latent, and generalizes existing methods for single measurement occasions of the mediator and outcome to longitudinal data on the mediator and outcome. The methods are utilized to assess the effects of an intervention on physical activity that is possibly mediated by motivation to exercise in a randomized study.

[1]  Stijn Vansteelandt,et al.  Mediation analysis of time‐to‐event endpoints accounting for repeatedly measured mediators subject to time‐varying confounding , 2019, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  Edward E. Rigdon,et al.  Parceling Cannot Reduce Factor Indeterminacy in Factor Analysis: A Research Note , 2019, Psychometrika.

[3]  Ting-Huei Chen,et al.  High dimensional mediation analysis with latent variables , 2019, Biometrics.

[4]  Edward E. Rigdon,et al.  Factor Indeterminacy as Metrological Uncertainty: Implications for Advancing Psychological Measurement , 2019, Multivariate behavioral research.

[5]  Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen,et al.  Estimation of Natural Indirect Effects Robust to Unmeasured Confounding and Mediator Measurement Error. , 2018, Epidemiology.

[6]  Jeffrey M Albert,et al.  Generalized causal mediation and path analysis: Extensions and practical considerations , 2018, Statistical methods in medical research.

[7]  Peter M. Steiner,et al.  Identification and Sensitivity Analysis for Average Causal Mediation Effects with Time-Varying Treatments and Mediators: Investigating the Underlying Mechanisms of Kindergarten Retention Policy , 2018, Psychometrika.

[8]  A. Pickles,et al.  Measurement error, time lag, unmeasured confounding: Considerations for longitudinal estimation of the effect of a mediator in randomised clinical trials , 2016, Statistical methods in medical research.

[9]  Erica E. M. Moodie,et al.  Dynamic Treatment Regimen Estimation via Regression-Based Techniques: Introducing R Package DTRreg , 2017 .

[10]  T. VanderWeele,et al.  Mediation analysis with time varying exposures and mediators , 2017, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology.

[11]  Yves Rosseel,et al.  Hypothesis Testing Using Factor Score Regression , 2016, Educational and psychological measurement.

[12]  Matthew S. Fritz,et al.  The Combined Effects of Measurement Error and Omitting Confounders in the Single-Mediator Model , 2016, Multivariate behavioral research.

[13]  E. Moodie,et al.  Mediation Analysis for Health Disparities Research. , 2016, American journal of epidemiology.

[14]  M. Sen,et al.  Explaining Causal Findings Without Bias: Detecting and Assessing Direct Effects , 2016, American Political Science Review.

[15]  Jeffrey M Albert,et al.  Causal mediation analysis with a latent mediator , 2016, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[16]  S. Vansteelandt,et al.  Revisiting g-estimation of the Effect of a Time-varying Exposure Subject to Time-varying Confounding , 2016 .

[17]  S. Vansteelandt,et al.  Structural equation modeling versus marginal structural modeling for assessing mediation in the presence of posttreatment confounding. , 2015, Psychological methods.

[18]  R. de Raedt,et al.  Mindful attention and awareness mediate the association between age and negative affect. , 2015, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[19]  George B. Ploubidis,et al.  Mediation Analysis With Intermediate Confounding: Structural Equation Modeling Viewed Through the Causal Inference Lens , 2014, American journal of epidemiology.

[20]  S. Vansteelandt,et al.  Causal Mediation Analysis with Multiple Mediators , 2014, Biometrics.

[21]  Xihong Lin,et al.  Mediation analysis when a continuous mediator is measured with error and the outcome follows a generalized linear model , 2014, Statistics in medicine.

[22]  Stijn Vansteelandt,et al.  Structural nested models and G-estimation: the partially realized promise , 2014, 1503.01589.

[23]  S. Vansteelandt,et al.  On regression adjustment for the propensity score , 2014, Statistics in medicine.

[24]  F. Thoemmes,et al.  Theory and Analysis of Total, Direct, and Indirect Causal Effects , 2014, Multivariate behavioral research.

[25]  Y. Rosseel,et al.  Estimation of Controlled Direct Effects in the Presence of Exposure-Induced Confounding and Latent Variables , 2014 .

[26]  James M. Robins,et al.  Effect decomposition in the presence of an exposure-induced mediator-outcome confounder. , 2014, Epidemiology.

[27]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[28]  Ilya Shpitser,et al.  Counterfactual Graphical Models for Longitudinal Mediation Analysis With Unobserved Confounding , 2012, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  Judea Pearl,et al.  The Do-Calculus Revisited , 2012, UAI.

[30]  Elizabeth L. Ogburn,et al.  The role of measurement error and misclassification in mediation analysis: mediation and measurement error. , 2012, Epidemiology.

[31]  Saskia le Cessie,et al.  Quantification of bias in direct effects estimates due to different types of measurement error in the mediator. , 2012, Epidemiology.

[32]  S. Vansteelandt Estimation of Direct and Indirect Effects , 2012 .

[33]  Yves Rosseel,et al.  lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling , 2012 .

[34]  J. Pearl The Causal Foundations of Structural Equation Modeling , 2012 .

[35]  K. Hagtvet,et al.  Mediation Analysis in a Latent Growth Curve Modeling Framework , 2011 .

[36]  T. VanderWeele Controlled Direct and Mediated Effects: Definition, Identification and Bounds , 2010, Scandinavian journal of statistics, theory and applications.

[37]  Alexander Kukush,et al.  Measurement Error Models , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[38]  L. Keele,et al.  A General Approach to Causal Mediation Analysis , 2010, Psychological methods.

[39]  Judea Pearl,et al.  On the Consistency Rule in Causal Inference: Axiom, Definition, Assumption, or Theorem? , 2010, Epidemiology.

[40]  Elizabeth A Stuart,et al.  Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. , 2010, Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics.

[41]  Johan H. L. Oud,et al.  Longitudinal research with latent variables , 2010 .

[42]  Tyler J. VanderWeele,et al.  Concerning the consistency assumption in causal inference. , 2009, Epidemiology.

[43]  Stijn Vansteelandt,et al.  Estimating Direct Effects in Cohort and Case–Control Studies , 2009, Epidemiology.

[44]  Stephen R Cole,et al.  The consistency statement in causal inference: a definition or an assumption? , 2009, Epidemiology.

[45]  Tyler J. VanderWeele,et al.  Conceptual issues concerning mediation, interventions and composition , 2009 .

[46]  Els Goetghebeur,et al.  Estimation of controlled direct effects , 2008 .

[47]  Stephen R Cole,et al.  Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models. , 2008, American journal of epidemiology.

[48]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[49]  A. Philip Dawid,et al.  Direct and Indirect Effects of Sequential Treatments , 2006, UAI.

[50]  Raymond J. Carroll,et al.  Measurement error in nonlinear models: a modern perspective , 2006 .

[51]  Mark J van der Laan,et al.  Estimation of Direct Causal Effects , 2006, Epidemiology.

[52]  Chen Avin,et al.  Identifiability of Path-Specific Effects , 2005, IJCAI.

[53]  Li-Shan Huang,et al.  Assessing interaction effects in linear measurement error models , 2005 .

[54]  K. Bollen,et al.  Autoregressive Latent Trajectory (ALT) Models A Synthesis of Two Traditions , 2004 .

[55]  Sophia Rabe-Hesketh,et al.  Correcting for covariate measurement error in logistic regression using nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation , 2003 .

[56]  Greta G. Cummings,et al.  Pearl's D-Separation: One More Step Into Causal Thinking , 2003 .

[57]  David P Mackinnon,et al.  Investigation of Mediational Processes Using Parallel Process Latent Growth Curve Modeling , 2003, Structural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal.

[58]  S. Cole,et al.  Fallibility in estimating direct effects. , 2002, International journal of epidemiology.

[59]  Petter Laake,et al.  Regression among factor scores , 2001 .

[60]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Direct and Indirect Effects , 2001, UAI.

[61]  F. Oort,et al.  Three-mode models for multivariate longitudinal data. , 2001, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[62]  J. Pearl Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[63]  James M. Robins,et al.  Marginal Structural Models versus Structural nested Models as Tools for Causal inference , 2000 .

[64]  J. H. Steiger,et al.  Dispelling Some Myths About Factor Indeterminancy. , 1996, Multivariate behavioral research.

[65]  J. Pearl Causal diagrams for empirical researchRejoinder to Discussions of ‘Causal diagrams for empirical research’ , 1995 .

[66]  J. Robins Correcting for non-compliance in randomized trials using structural nested mean models , 1994 .

[67]  J. Robins,et al.  Identifiability and Exchangeability for Direct and Indirect Effects , 1992, Epidemiology.

[68]  P. H. Schönemann,et al.  On the Use of Factor Scores for Prediction , 1987 .

[69]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[70]  P. Rosenbaum The Consequences of Adjustment for a Concomitant Variable that Has Been Affected by the Treatment , 1984 .

[71]  George W. Bohrnstedt,et al.  The Reliability of Products of Two Random Variables , 1978 .

[72]  Larry W. Cornwell,et al.  Mathematical forms of the distribution of the product of two normal variables , 1978 .

[73]  A. E. Maxwell,et al.  Regression and factor analysis , 1973 .

[74]  A. Goldberger,et al.  On the Exact Covariance of Products of Random Variables , 1969 .

[75]  M. S. Bartlett,et al.  The statistical conception of mental factors. , 1937 .

[76]  S. Wright The Method of Path Coefficients , 1934 .