Influence of limb alignment on mediolateral loading in total knee replacement: in vivo measurements in five patients.

BACKGROUND Malalignment after total knee replacement could cause overloading of the implant bearing as well as of the bone itself, leading to osteolysis and early loosening. To quantify the stresses the implant has to withstand and to define a safe zone of limb alignment, the total contact forces as well as their mediolateral distribution have to be determined. Analytical gait data and mathematical models have been used for this purpose. We performed this study to determine in vivo loads of five patients after implantation of an instrumented tibial baseplate. METHODS Five patients with osteoarthritis of the knee received total knee replacement. The tibial component was instrumented with strain gauges for the measurement of three forces and three moments. The signals from the gauges were transferred telemetrically to an external receiver. At twelve months after surgery, postoperative measurements were obtained with the patients walking at a self-selected comfortable speed across a level walkway. Peak axial and medial forces of fifteen to twenty gait cycles were averaged and reported as a percent of individual body weight. RESULTS During the stance phase of the gait cycle, two maxima of the axial force occurred. Typical values were 215% of body weight at the first peak and 266% of body weight at the second peak. The medial load share was typically 73% at the first axial force peak and 65% at the second axial force peak. Analysis of inter-individual variations revealed a linear correlation with limb alignment. A deviation of 1° varus from neutral alignment increased the medial load share by 5%. CONCLUSIONS Consistent with the results of previous studies, we found that the force transferred by the medial compartment was usually greater than that transferred by the lateral compartment. Concerning the design of total knee replacements, an asymmetric tibial component with a larger medial contact area could possibly reduce peak contact stress on the bone and improve fixation of the implant. Mediolateral load distribution was quantified and correlated with limb alignment, thereby permitting the effects of malalignment after total knee replacement to be estimated.

[1]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Determination of typical patterns from strongly varying signals , 2012, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[2]  Kenneth E. Davis,et al.  Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it? , 2009, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  D. D’Lima,et al.  Predicting the effect of tray malalignment on risk for bone damage and implant subsidence after total knee arthroplasty , 2011, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[4]  Nih Consensus Panel NIH Consensus Statement on total knee replacement December 8-10, 2003. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  Daniel J Berry,et al.  Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  Gerard A Engh,et al.  Factors associated with the loss of thickness of polyethylene tibial bearings after knee arthroplasty. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  Allen Caldwell,et al.  Panel , 1991, 2021 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom).

[8]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Design, calibration and pre-clinical testing of an instrumented tibial tray. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  D. Bruce,et al.  Reduction of Total Knee Replacement Wear with Vitamin E Blended Highly Cross-Linked Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene , 2011, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[10]  Nih Consensus Panel NIH Consensus Statement on total knee replacement December 8-10, 2003. , 2004 .

[11]  J. Rand,et al.  Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  A Rohlmann,et al.  [Loads acting on orthopaedic implants. Measurements and practical applications]. , 2007, Der Orthopade.

[13]  Dong Zhao,et al.  In vivo medial and lateral tibial loads during dynamic and high flexion activities , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[14]  Georg Bergmann,et al.  The effect of valgus braces on medial compartment load of the knee joint - in vivo load measurements in three subjects. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  M. Ritter,et al.  Tibial Component Failure Mechanisms in Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Loading of the knee joint during activities of daily living measured in vivo in five subjects. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  A. Amis,et al.  Analysis of bone-prosthesis interface micromotion for cementless tibial prosthesis fixation and the influence of loading conditions. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  B. Fregly,et al.  Correlation between the knee adduction torque and medial contact force for a variety of gait patterns , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[19]  L. A. Koman,et al.  Acute Pain Following Musculoskeletal Injuries and Orthopaedic Surgery , 2004 .

[20]  J. Liau,et al.  The effect of malalignment on stresses in polyethylene component of total knee prostheses--a finite element analysis. , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.

[21]  D. D’Lima,et al.  An implantable telemetry device to measure intra-articular tibial forces. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  C. Rorabeck,et al.  Sources of osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty: wear of the bearing surface. , 2004, Instructional course lectures.

[23]  David Felson,et al.  Varus and valgus alignment and incident and progressive knee osteoarthritis , 2010, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[24]  L. Sharma,et al.  Medial-to-Lateral Ratio of Tibiofemoral Subchondral Bone Area is Adapted to Alignment and Mechanical Load , 2009, Calcified Tissue International.