A randomized trial of nurse specialist home care for women with high-risk pregnancies: outcomes and costs.

OBJECTIVE To examine prenatal, maternal, and infant outcomes and costs through 1 year after delivery using a model of prenatal care for women at high risk of delivering low-birth-weight infants in which half of the prenatal care was provided in women's homes by nurse specialists with master's degrees. STUDY DESIGN Randomized clinical trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS A sample of 173 women (and 194 infants) with high-risk pregnancies (gestational or pregestational diabetes mellitus, chronic hypertension, preterm labor, or high risk of preterm labor) were randomly assigned to the intervention group (85 women and 94 infants) or the control group (88 women and 100 infants). Control women received usual prenatal care. Intervention women received half of their prenatal care in their homes, with teaching, counseling, telephone outreach, daily telephone availability, and a postpartum home visit by nurse specialists with physician backup. RESULTS For the full sample, mean maternal age was 27 years; 85.5% of women were single mothers, 36.4% had less than a high school education, 93.6% were African American, and 93.6% had public health insurance, with no differences between groups on these variables. The intervention group had lower fetal/infant mortality vs the control group (2 vs 9), 11 fewer preterm infants, more twin pregnancies carried to term (77.7% vs 33.3%), fewer prenatal hospitalizations (41 vs 49), fewer infant rehospitalizations (18 vs 24), and a savings of more than 750 total hospital days and $2,496,145 [corrected]. CONCLUSION This model of care provides a reasoned solution to improving pregnancy and infant outcomes while reducing healthcare costs.

[1]  G. Liggins,et al.  System for Predicting Spontaneous Preterm Birth , 1980, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  D. Harper MONITORING WOMEN AT RISK FOR PRETERM LABOR. , 1998 .

[3]  M. Kramer,et al.  The contribution of mild and moderate preterm birth to infant mortality. Fetal and Infant Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. , 2000, JAMA.

[4]  M. Delivoria-Papadopoulos,et al.  A randomized clinical trial of early hospital discharge and home follow-up of very-low-birth-weight infants. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  R. Wolf,et al.  Development of a patient satisfaction scale. , 1986, Research in nursing & health.

[6]  C. Victora,et al.  A randomized trial of psychosocial support during high-risk pregnancies , 1992 .

[7]  R. Wapner,et al.  A randomized multicenter trial assessing a home uterine activity monitoring device used in the absence of daily nursing contact. , 1995, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  Brown Ss Prenatal care : reaching mothers, reaching infants , 1988 .

[9]  Creasy Rk,et al.  System for predicting spontaneous preterm birth. , 1980 .

[10]  M. Zuckerman,et al.  Construction of new scales for the Multiple Affect Adjective Check List , 1983 .

[11]  S. Finkler,et al.  A Randomized Trial of Early Hospital Discharge and Home Follow-Up of Women Having Cesarean Birth , 1994, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  E. Siegel,et al.  Home visitors and child health: analysis of selected programs. , 1990, Pediatrics.

[13]  A. Samadi,et al.  Maternal Hypertension and Spontaneous Preterm Births Among Black Women , 1998, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  L. Klerman,et al.  The impact of short interpregnancy intervals on pregnancy outcomes in a low-income population. , 1998, American journal of public health.

[15]  K. Cain,et al.  The effect of expanding Medicaid prenatal services on birth outcomes. , 1998, American journal of public health.

[16]  A. Swank,et al.  A randomized trial of early discharge and nurse specialist transitional follow-up care of high-risk childbearing women. , 1997, Nursing research.

[17]  A. C. Primavesi Neurologic and Developmental Disability after Extremely Preterm Birth , 2000 .

[18]  S. Gennaro,et al.  Reasons for acute care visits and rehospitalizations in very low-birthweight infants. , 1990, Neonatal network : NN.

[19]  N. Moss,et al.  The effect of WIC and Medicaid on infant mortality in the United States. , 1998, American journal of public health.

[20]  P. Ancel,et al.  Very and moderate preterm births: are the risk factors different? , 1999, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[21]  C. Henderson,et al.  Improving the life-course development of socially disadvantaged mothers: a randomized trial of nurse home visitation. , 1988, American journal of public health.

[22]  Armstrong Ma,et al.  Monitoring women at risk for preterm labor , 1998 .

[23]  M. Moore,et al.  Cigarette Smoking, Low Birth Weight, and Preterm Births in Low-Income African American Women , 2000, Journal of Perinatology.