Direct measurement of formation of loops in DNA by a human tumor suppressor protein

In previous work we developed methods using optical tweezers to measure protein-mediated formation of loops in DNA structures that can play an important role in regulating gene expression. We previously applied this method to study two-site restriction endonucleases, which were convenient model systems for studying this phenomenon. Here we report preliminary work in which we have applied this method to study p53, a human tumor suppressor protein, and show that we can measure formation of loops. Previous biophysical evidence for loops comes from relatively limited qualitative studies of fixed complexes by electron microscopy4. Our results provide independent corroboration and future opportunities for more quantitative studies investigating structure and mechanics.

[1]  J. E. Stenger,et al.  p53 oligomerization and DNA looping are linked with transcriptional activation. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[2]  H. Viadiu,et al.  The tetramer of p53 in the absence of DNA forms a relaxed quaternary state. , 2012, Biochemistry.

[3]  V. Zhurkin,et al.  p53-induced DNA bending and twisting: p53 tetramer binds on the outer side of a DNA loop and increases DNA twisting. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Derek N. Fuller,et al.  DNA as a metrology standard for length and force measurements with optical tweezers. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[5]  J. Weitzman,et al.  A genomic map of p53 binding sites identifies novel p53 targets involved in an apoptotic network. , 2005, Cancer research.

[6]  K. McLure,et al.  How p53 binds DNA as a tetramer , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[7]  Rachel Millin,et al.  A general method for manipulating DNA sequences from any organism with optical tweezers , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  Rachel Millin,et al.  Tension-dependent DNA cleavage by restriction endonucleases: two-site enzymes are "switched off" at low force. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Rachel Millin,et al.  DNA looping by two-site restriction endonucleases: heterogeneous probability distributions for loop size and unbinding force , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  K. Vousden,et al.  p53 mutations in cancer , 2013, Nature Cell Biology.

[11]  Yongheng Chen,et al.  Crystal structure of the p53 core domain bound to a full consensus site as a self-assembled tetramer. , 2010, Structure.

[12]  P. Tegtmeyer,et al.  Synergistic transcriptional activation of the MCK promoter by p53: tetramers link separated DNA response elements by DNA looping , 1998, Oncogene.

[13]  P. Jackson,et al.  Distinct distal and proximal p53‐binding sites in the MCK promoter govern the transcriptional response to p53 , 1997, FEBS letters.

[14]  Z. Weng,et al.  A Global Map of p53 Transcription-Factor Binding Sites in the Human Genome , 2006, Cell.

[15]  P. Tegtmeyer,et al.  Interaction of p53 with its consensus DNA-binding site , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[16]  E. Orlova,et al.  Quaternary structure of the specific p53–DNA complex reveals the mechanism of p53 mutant dominance , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  O. De Wever,et al.  Modeling and quantification of cancer cell invasion through collagen type I matrices. , 2010, The International journal of developmental biology.

[18]  Douglas E. Smith,et al.  Dynamics of single DNA looping and cleavage by Sau3AI and effect of tension applied to the DNA. , 2006, Biophysical journal.